Conroe 2.4Ghz on 965G mobo, brief test...

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

04-05-2006, 05:58 AM
ORCBEAST

Quote:

Originally Posted by VictorWang

tried...but...no use :(
everest ultimate v2.8 can show the correct vcore

I got this off google worth a shot.
If 0 (default value) reports a wrong vcore, try 1, 2 and so on. ...

Have u tried to go on with the numbers ?
04-05-2006, 05:58 AM
NiCKE^

Oh nice, tweak some and get sub 21 :P
04-05-2006, 05:59 AM
mine

Quote:

Originally Posted by VictorWang

superpi comes more stable, 21.4sec for 5times.
will come pi_32m later

phantastic job , victor

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
04-05-2006, 06:01 AM
freecableguy

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisf6969

The 0403 BIOS allows lower voltage....

:stick: FCG, FUGGER have you tried this unreleased 0403 BIOS

No. 0403...is this for the -E or -WS variant?
04-05-2006, 06:03 AM
Rovtar

Congrats Victor..

And i hope that you will get better bios :D:toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast:
04-05-2006, 06:08 AM
mine

Quote:

Originally Posted by ubi

With Cinebench 2003?

as a teaser
till victor got the time
yonah@2980 Cinebench > 800
04-05-2006, 06:12 AM
ORCBEAST

Quote:

Originally Posted by mine

as a teaser
till victor got the time
yonah@2980 Cinebench > 800

Hehe Thx :) Now we have something to check for. You think the conroe in its current state will beat it ? With that BETA bios etc. :stick:
04-05-2006, 06:17 AM
kcc77_kuo

Good Job
Victor:woot:
04-05-2006, 06:17 AM
ubi

Quote:

Originally Posted by mine

as a teaser
till victor got the time
yonah@2980 Cinebench > 800

955XE @ 4800 more than 900. :)
04-05-2006, 06:23 AM
iboomalot

Super Pi is the general standard thats used not system tools version.

like to see a 8m super pi.

I agree Intel looks to have stepped up to the bat finally.

still comes down to gaming and decoding and photoshop reproduction, things that the general public uses not crunching PI.

and I agree 18 mins 32m pi is very fast ***hats off***
04-05-2006, 06:26 AM
crotale

Quote:

Originally Posted by ORCBEAST

I got this off google worth a shot.
If 0 (default value) reports a wrong vcore, try 1, 2 and so on. ...

Have u tried to go on with the numbers ?

What CPUz reads is irrelevant. The CPU is running at stock speeds, and Victor said it's 1.2V stock vcore. If it really is 1.1v, 1.2v or 1.3v doesn't matter, especially when it's not overclocked and when there are no other CPUs to compare it to. Besides, CPUz or any other software aren't trustworthy at all.
04-05-2006, 06:30 AM
VictorWang

Quote:

Originally Posted by mine

phantastic job , victor

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

some update info.
later will post pictures:

sisoft
cpu alu=28k
multimedia=144k
mem=4k8
cache=55k

3dmark05, cputest=3008

pi_32m toooo slow, 'cos of only 256m*2 ram, my mobo now cannot support 1G*2 ram, pity !:( :(
04-05-2006, 06:30 AM
ORCBEAST

Quote:

Originally Posted by crotale

What CPUz reads is irrelevant. The CPU is running at stock speeds, and Victor said it's 1.2V stock vcore. If it really is 1.1v, 1.2v or 1.3v doesn't matter, especially when it's not overclocked and when there are no other CPUs to compare it to. Besides, CPUz or any other software aren't trustworthy at all.

I know :) Just trying to help him out. Not much I can do :(
04-05-2006, 06:32 AM
jebo_4jc

Quote:

Originally Posted by tsuehpsyde

Wow, you sure are a douchebag over something you don't deserve. Next time, get an ES chip yourself and get them working. Oh, wait, you can't even look at an ES, let alone touch or use one. :p: ES are quirky for a reason: They're Engineering Samples. The fact that users in these forums already have them in their hands is a grace. Learn some god damn patience, kid.

I'm not claiming I could get my hands on an ES or get it working, and I'm not impatient.
But, I am pissed because when I hear "CONROE INCOMING" and lots of hype about benchmarks coming "within 6 hours" to paraphrase FCG, then I see all the posts get deleted, and nothing said but well we couldn't get our mobo working I feel cheated. Again, my advice is to keep your mouths shut until you can actually get something working before triumphantly announcing the arrival of a much anticipated product.
04-05-2006, 06:33 AM
iboomalot

Quote:

Originally Posted by VictorWang

some update info.

pi_32m toooo slow, 'cos of only 256m*2 ram, my mobo now cannot support 1G*2 ram, pity !:( :(

try a 8m run that would be nice to see and should be attainable
04-05-2006, 06:40 AM
Drizzt81

thanks for the benchmarks, victor.
04-05-2006, 06:54 AM
freecableguy

Quote:

Originally Posted by jebo_4jc

I'm not claiming I could get my hands on an ES or get it working, and I'm not impatient.
But, I am pissed because when I hear "CONROE INCOMING" and lots of hype about benchmarks coming "within 6 hours" to paraphrase FCG, then I see all the posts get deleted, and nothing said but well we couldn't get our mobo working I feel cheated. Again, my advice is to keep your mouths shut until you can actually get something working before triumphantly announcing the arrival of a much anticipated product.

Excuse my French, but go :banana::banana::banana::banana: yourself.
04-05-2006, 06:56 AM
Donni

Quote:

Originally Posted by freecableguy

No. 0403...is this for the -E or -WS variant?

for the -E !
04-05-2006, 06:58 AM
NiCKE^

Well you aren't forced to check this threads so you know ;)
Let FCG get his things together.
04-05-2006, 07:03 AM
Supertim0r

Quote:

Originally Posted by freecableguy

Excuse my French, but go :banana::banana::banana::banana: yourself.

:owned:
04-05-2006, 07:05 AM
i found nemo

Quote:

Originally Posted by jebo_4jc

Shame on FCG and Fugger for getting our hopes up :mad:

My advice is, next time your "source" says you *might* be able to get an ES working on a current motherboard *if* you get lucky, don't ejaculate all over yourselves with excitement, and spread the word that "CONROE BENCHES INCOMING" until you actually get something working.

I feel like this was purely a publicity stunt to increase the XS readership, and it appears to have worked. Now I just feel like I have been cheated.

1st off, you should be so lucky they haven't banned you yet. second off, xs " reader ship " pft ... do you know how many members xs has? :fact: ya know, just chill out, guy. quit complaining and do something productive for the community if your going to post :slap:

btw, victor good job on the benchies man keep up the good work
04-05-2006, 07:12 AM
nCrusader

Quote:

Originally Posted by VictorWang

3dmark05, cputest=3008

For comparison, did some quick tests on the systems I could grab:
FX57 @ 2400Mhz (240x10) = 56xx (clock to clock comparison)
955XE @ 4500MHz (300x15) = 89xx (my 24/7 rig)

(FX-system used X1900XTX, the Intel-system a 6600GT)
04-05-2006, 07:21 AM
DrJohn

Great work victor.

Great work victor, I hope you get a PCI graphics card working on that board.
04-05-2006, 07:23 AM
mike

Quote:

Originally Posted by i found nemo

1st off, you should be so lucky they haven't banned you yet. second off, xs " reader ship " pft ... do you know how many members xs has? :fact: ya know, just chill out, guy. quit complaining and do something productive for the community if your going to post :slap:

XS is thankfully not a community that bans for no real reason - but I totally agree that we certainly could forgo the whining in this thread!

@ jebo - trust me FCG + Fugger are doing all that is in their power to get things off the ground - while information given to them by some mobo manufacturers promised 'all go' for the Conroe to work - things turned out to be not as green as expected...Not need to stick the finger at them while they are trying all they can atm. Better to support the efforts rather than putting them down - neh?

@ Victor - what was the culprit for the performance swings?

Can you enlighten us with some BIOS settings - in particular Voltages and what type of power management options the Conroe/965 platform has / is running.
04-05-2006, 07:24 AM
Revv23

1 Attachment(s)

time to sell all my amd stuff lol.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page