Well Beep, don't feel bad. I just now got 4.3ghz with my 1100t on this CHV. 4.2ghz was a breeze with 0052 bios. 4.3 took 1.55v though. Didn't score well either. Still hoping for better. I peaked at 50*C durring the Bench.
Printable View
Well Beep, don't feel bad. I just now got 4.3ghz with my 1100t on this CHV. 4.2ghz was a breeze with 0052 bios. 4.3 took 1.55v though. Didn't score well either. Still hoping for better. I peaked at 50*C durring the Bench.
Cooling is SS unit.
Hardware optimizations are basicly better memory, higer HT and NB frequency, timing optimizations.
IMC in this 1090T is insane.
Anyway, screenshot is 100% genuine i did not edit it.
Ill rerun it again later, getting wierd since betwean 2 runs there is tons difference no idea why, it varies from 7.6 to 8.2 with only upping voltages.
I ran it with 4.3ghz since im looking for 24/7 stable settings with 1.5v not just Cinebench stable, its capable 24/7 stable 4.5ghz but i need find the settings what it will run 24/7 stable and that defined by 3hours LinX and 12hours Prime95.
Well I was unable to do 4.2 on M4A89, 4.23 @ 1.57v on CHV was good.Quote:
Originally Posted by charged3800z24
My CPU is either rediculous or I am lacking magical overclocking skills...and it's not like there's much to it. Set multi, set HT ref, set voltage, run test.
Tried this again.
4.28 on CHV with 1.62v load failed Cinebench 11.5 before it was a third of the way in.
how are temps
last chance to 4400 MHz run with my 1090T....1.55V. We will soon.
51c before crash. Motherboard sensor was 63c...it reads higher than my M4A89TD did.Quote:
Originally Posted by crazydiamond
first man with FX here....:), I must push it to 8.2 in next weeks...today is day of reviews for me, srry :)
Aircooled Noctua NH-D14, FX-8120 95W, Crosshair V Formula
Attachment 121180
first man with FX here....:), I must push it to 8.2 in next weeks...today is day of reviews for me, srry :)
Aircooled Noctua NH-D14, FX-8120 95W, Crosshair V Formula
Attachment 121180
9.46pts @ 4.9GHz, RAM@1600MHz, with good old 2600k - just to compare with a brand new Bulldozer-rig at the same frequency. It would be interesting to see which frequency is required to go past that.
Attachment 121181
http://xeizo.com/blogg/wp-content/up.../cinebench.jpg
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2042107
Flanker what are you playing at? This is meant to be your benchmark :p
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/3031/834cl7.png
:clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
Geez, gonna have to make a score chart just for you if you keep this up! :rofl:
Code:Name /Post# Score Cooling CPU MHz ScreenShot
01 FlanK3r /391 9.36 LN2 X6 1100T 5418 URL
02 FlanK3r /408 8.08 AIR X8 FX-8120 4941 URL
03 FlanK3r /284 7.78 AIR X6 1090T 4360
04 FlanK3r /348 5.24 AIR X4 975 4417
05 FlanK3r /259 4.80 AIR X4 970 4071
06 FlanK3r /52 4.76 AIR X4 965 4045
07 FlanK3r /381 4.24 AIR X4 A8-3850 3538 URL
ReKcOlNu: hehe, n1 :-)
Gappo: Im warm up :D (whats your cooling, looks nice chip...)
Just a VenX :)
What the f*ck? Only 8+ points w/ 8 cores running at 4950MHz? Don't think any bios that is bound to come out any time soon will give enough of a boost to justify the purchase of a new cpu for me at this moment. :(
~K8 IPC, at least it's better than Pentium 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
K8 is only, what? 5, 6 years back in time? No reason to complain really. :D
ZEUS: hello to FX launch day :)...But after OC it is better, than OC Thuban in performance. Winrar is totaly crazy, u can get 6000kb/s!
Well, you guys say what you want... But I've read alot about folks saying that FX was a joke (worse than Thuban), and it sucked @ Cinebench. :p:
I've had this chip for ~3 hrs, and already I've broken the 8.0 barrier on CB 11.5.
Believe me when I tell you, I worked my butt off to try and get there with a number of Thubans... ;)
So far, all I've done is tweak the CPU Multi and HTRef. I haven't even started on the IMC or Mem clocks yet.
Much less, cranking V's (modest bumps only)...
Maybe, I got a golden chip (doubt it), but I'm pretty happy with my results so far!
I can already tell this 8120 is going to be fun to tweak, and I have NO regrets about investing $220 on the new tech...
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c3..._FX_CB_808.png
Granted, CineBench isn't the end all, be all, of benchmarks, but in all reality my whole system seems much snappier in general.
After reading alot of the reviews I thought I'd wasted my money...
Now that I have the chip in my rig, I'm not dissapointed at all. :D
The 8120's seem to be doing great with lower voltages :)
Gappo: I'm a wuss when it comes to voltage... :rolleyes:
It takes me forever to finaly dial in a chip because I'm such a voltage/temp wimp. :p:
I usually wind up with a nice 24/7 clock in the end though (even though it may take me 3 months). :rofl:
So many people have been dogging this chip (even AMD folks).
Is it an SB Killer? NO, but I seriously doubt it'll be the death of AMD as some folks would lead us to believe!
I actually like it!
It's been fun to OC so far, and I just started playing with it... ;)
Gratz on finally breakin 8 points Dave. :up:
If anything, these BD cpu's seem to overclock very well but you and i both know if i could get my trusty old Thuban to run at such speed, BD would get it's ass handed by it.
Don't mean to spoil the fun for you Dave so i really hope you will enjoy that chip and it's likely that if Asus will bring out a bios that supports BD for my old Crosshair IV F, i will get me one of these chips, just to see how high i can overclock it. 5GHz+ on AMD would be a sweet number, especially when it's 24/7 stable. :)
nice Dave, only 1.37 V ?!!!
Yep, Thuban@5GHz scores 9+. However your chip seems very promising, much lower vCore than all chips in the reviews.
Looking forward to see your scores going higher and higher :)
what's the DC mode ? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gappo
i'm use to seeing ganged or unganged ?
perhaps not everything is as it seems in this chip
i'd like to point out that thuban has 50% more Instruction cache.