Did you read the comments above that o wise one?
:D
Printable View
Did you read the comments above that o wise one?
:D
I read all of them, lol.
So today I had my first real attempt at doing some sort of HDR photo, obviously I need a LOT more practice, but as they say, practice makes perfect.
3 shots, +2, 0, -2, Canon 40D, no tripod, photomatrix used.
http://img388.imageshack.us/img388/5...edresizun8.jpg
Does Photoshop CS3 handle noise better? I find Photomatrix to be... Quite bad in that department, but that could just be a new guys opinion.
After using both CS3 and Photomatix, I find that CS3 gives more realistic results and less noise, while Photomatix usually gives more surreal and impressionist results - which most often results in a higher noise ratio.Quote:
Originally Posted by JacobN
Yeah Photomatix increases noise while CS3 usually supresses it. They both combine the images in very different ways.
Photomatix is also very bad at alignment, especially if you have trees/leaves in the image.
Nothing that really compares to you guys, but thought id post them anyway. :yepp:
http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/9...lding08jw1.jpg
http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/6613/weeds08pi6.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...terfallhdr.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...55/shore08.jpg
My first attempts to make HDR
http://mauri.1g.fi/kuvat/jotain/puis...g/_smaller.jpg
what are the step by step guides to do hdr?
...
What the...???? Is that Jurassic Park? Awesome picture.:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by jan
woops.. meant to include the above picture.:confused:
Thanks :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Dcepter1
It was to dark to see any dinos :-D
and the second picture from last night
sunset hdr
@ WiK1d
Hey mate, got that pic in 1024/768?
I love it.
-yonton228/timmy
Photoshop CS3, Photomatix, Bibble pro you name it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Metric
I find Photoshop hard to use. I can get it done but things that should take very little time end up taking me hours.
http://flytek.effectivehosting.co.za...ldharbours.jpg
http://flytek.effectivehosting.co.za...r/hdr1855s.jpg
http://flytek.effectivehosting.co.za...drartcafes.jpg
http://flytek.effectivehosting.co.za...r/hdrbarns.jpg
http://flytek.effectivehosting.co.za...r/hdrblues.jpg
http://flytek.effectivehosting.co.za...hdrchouses.jpg
http://flytek.effectivehosting.co.za...hdrdiggers.jpg
http://flytek.effectivehosting.co.za.../hdrgreens.jpg
http://flytek.effectivehosting.co.za...drgreens2s.jpg
http://flytek.effectivehosting.co.za...ewharbours.jpg
Read the comments about HDR and using 1 photo where you've adjusted exposures for a pseudo-HDR attempt. Found a situation where it helped get what I wanted, since I had no tripod when I took the shot and also needed to get it posted quickly with minimal PS time.
I don't often use this technique, but thought this one came out okay. (With no tripod available, I didn't try separate exposures, just adjusted +/- 2, then ran through Photomatix).
http://shazza53.smugmug.com/photos/4...48_waWBq-L.jpg
Not bad shazza, I'm seeing a bit of over-saturation and noise common to Photomatix but other than that, not bad.
Agree - especially in the ceiling, where it was too dark to begin with. Definitely would be better with separate shots, instead of working with one exposure. Also could have used some cleanup in PS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulburner
@ S E T H - nice series!