Bingo, could you show us your 9x multi fsb max.
Printable View
Bingo, could you show us your 9x multi fsb max.
if bingo13 can run orthos or dual 32M at lower speeds it isn't software related.......it's just stability issue there that's it
i've had some Venices run at 2.8Ghz even if 1M superPI could not finish and it ran application stable for months lol so i don't see a major issue with that anyways heheheh :D
I;ve experienced what Bingo has too at times. There is a need for a new test to be compiled by someone for Conroe I think. IN the modern age people demand evidence in some form or another so tests have to be run. Maybe not so much on XS, but globally and amongst more casual people you have to provide some means of evidence supporting your results..
Back on topic, I think 500fsb is plenty for most, not everyone perhaps, but it's certainly enough for the bigger market where the profits come from..
regards
Raja
Bingo/Tony, so what about SATA/RAID? Any issues/errors?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnemonik23
i think bingo already said somewhere it works and works well.
did he? I did not see the responce yet :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
Last time bingo wrote that he used hdd image 7 times and I wanted to find out if that because of RAID got corrupted after locks/reboot as a result of experiments with OC, OR there are SATA/RAID errors/lockups while running HDD untils (like with current 680i mobos).
LOL M8y...same here. Another month or 2 is kinda sucking for me too, ....but sh1t happens eh! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Trice
My Amiga is keeping me in touch! ;)
Also Special Thanks to Tony & the others bringing us this info. Nice one lads & keep it coming! :)
Yeah I can wait I guess, final is on Friday then nothing for awhile. My lappy (in sig) isnt too bad so far. Glad I got the bigger screen.
Anyway, thanks for all the info guys!
QFT. Orthos and Super PI are just doing math... if the system can't do math error free... it's not stable! It really doesn't get any simpler! There is a reason that Prime95 and Orthos are used for stability testing... From the Wikipedia article...Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Quote:
On an absolutely stable system, Prime95 would run indefinitely. If an error occurs (the tray icon will become yellow from the default red, indicating that the test has halted), there is a chance that the system is unstable. There is an ongoing debate about terms "stable" and "Prime-stable", as Prime95 often fails before the system becomes unstable or crashes in any other application. This is because Prime 95 is designed to subject the CPU to an incredibly intense workload, and to halt when it encounters even one minor error, whereas most normal applications do not stress the CPU anywhere near as much, and will continue to operate unless they encounter a fatal error.
I'm also interested in this.. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by MrDeeds
is 9 x 450fsb stable?? or you can do 9x500fsb with just xtreme cooling.. :)
@ALL
let not judge an early product jsut yet.. :) look at DFI Infinity 975x.. at first many problems.. now the OC is fying.. :)
Prime is not a perfect test for stability Ive found, since Ive had rigs it was stable with under load but actually unstable doing normal things. The russian one that tests the gpu and psu as well is far harder, thats the true test imo
which one?Quote:
Originally Posted by 775911
Not to go further off topic... but doesn't TAT stress the C2D harder than Prime?
Yes that is what we need.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrDeeds
people ALWAYS post those dammed 7 and 8 x multi :(
AND SO WHAT?
Give us the max fsb for a E6600, most of us have that :D:toast:
bump for SATA/RAID
It does temperaturewise but TAT can't fail so it won't show you any errors (atleast not for me).Quote:
Originally Posted by Poodle
Btw Tony, Bingo or DFI Rep :) It there any truth to the rumor that Oscar Wu worked so hard ont the bios mainly because support will be really limited?
my guess is OCCT v0.91 unless it's been updated since last year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerosupra
i haven't used that in forever :)
The Orthos test was set to blend. I can get it to pass when overclocking but then my apps are not always stable with settings that Orthos likes. I cannot get it to pass for more than a few minutes at DDR2-866 3-3-3-6 1T with some very aggressive sub-timings but 4-4-3 is fine. However, I let the system loop 3D06 all night without an issue while looping a three minute AVI file in the background at the 3-3-3 settings. I still think Orthos needs an update as each new chipset or processor release just brings up further problems (questions) with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by raju
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnemonik23
I am not having any issues so far with the SB600 RAID while overclocking, the Promise setup is a little different. I plan on spending the evening doing an entire series of RAID tests with three Raptors before I start writing our Preview Article for this week. This board is going to need a couple of reviews to cover everything. ;)
Lower speeds is not the issue, looser timings will cure Orthos but places me into some issues with applications at the same speed. I will post an Orthos shot shortly and tell me if you notice something weird. :D I just think Orthos needs an update. I have had issues with it since Conroe launched and it gets worse with each new chipset. Conroe on Bearlake is even worse. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
I will, but all it will prove is that my E6600 will not do more than 3.65 on air. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by MrDeeds
Thank you! I'm looking forward for your review and I hope it will be completed before 15th :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by bingo13
Is it Bingo and Tony who has the board?
If possible I would like to see some 4x1Gb ram tests. :)
I believe RGone also has a board.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gascogne
Asus working on a RD600 board
http://www.nordichardware.com/news,5262.html