Conroe 2.4Ghz on 965G mobo, brief test...

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

04-05-2006, 03:46 AM
over@locker886

Quote:

Originally Posted by d4n13l

Conroe is faster, but you can't buy it in the next months...

yes, that is problem..

What difference in superpi? (yonah vs conroe)
/I heard conroe and merom is same chip/
04-05-2006, 03:54 AM
ORCBEAST

Quote:

Originally Posted by iboomalot

dual 8m pi in 54.4 secs is BS

lets see some screen shots with PiFast

Okey hmm that thing has more settings to F *** around with. Not to mention How do we know whats fast if I score 20 how fast is that ? Is there a comparable table u can put up so we can check where it will lay.:fact:

ORCBEAST
04-05-2006, 04:04 AM
iboomalot

I want to see a screen shot like this one of your 54.4 secs dual Pi

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...32m_24m19s.jpg

no way you are doing a 18 min 32m and 54.4 sec 8m it doesn't scale that way.

also says test 1 was aborted in that screen shot you posted too.
04-05-2006, 04:12 AM
PcCI2iminal

what s happen today?
1 thread with 15 pages ?
300+ posts?
50000+ views??

Victor thank you for this!!!!

:woot:
04-05-2006, 04:18 AM
Eastcoasthandle

look at the doubting AMD fanboys who can't stand the idea that Intel has actually produced a faster CPU... I read these remarks across several threads
"What does SuperPI mean...AMD N-Bench V3.1 or PI Fast is better, lets see how Conroe does with those apples" :mad: :mad:
"That's not real and Super PI is for Intel only not AMD" :mad: :mad:
"He didn't say what HS he was using so the tests aren't valid"
"Those test were fake and the screenie photoshop"
"wow, that's fast :eek2: I am sure AMD will answer promptly with something faster" :2cents:
Oh don't forget AMDiots using Intel avatars...thats a good one! :stick:
"Here is AMD's new pricing structure later this year :hump: (Posted in a Conroe Super PI thread)" <--Isn't that :off:

"he didn't run the test while flushing the toilet, therefore it's invalid" To be honest this is what all the complaints read to me, LOL
04-05-2006, 04:21 AM
kyosen

Quote:

Originally Posted by iboomalot

I want to see a screen shot like this one of your 54.4 secs dual Pi

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...32m_24m19s.jpg

no way you are doing a 18 min 32m and 54.4 sec 8m it doesn't scale that way.

also says test 1 was aborted in that screen shot you posted too.

Mr. mine was saying about not SuperPI but PI of Systool built-in.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=364
04-05-2006, 04:22 AM
wonderwall

Thats so impressive and so weird vcore 8O
04-05-2006, 04:45 AM
WHERES_MY_CARD

freecable guy check your email
04-05-2006, 04:46 AM
WHERES_MY_CARD

no more card?

freecable guy check your email
04-05-2006, 05:08 AM
mascaras

VictorWang new CPU_Z version relased that already suport conroe

Quote:

News and corrections:

* Memory Command Rate timing added.
* Improved support for Intel Conroe/Merom CPUs.
* Celeron M 420/430 Yonah.
* Xeon Dual core Dempsey.
* VIA C7-M CPU detection added.
* VIA PT880, PT880 Pro, K8T900 chipsets support.
* nVidia nForce 550/560/570 (MCP55) chipset support.
* VIA VT8251 southbridge support.
* Fixed HyperTransport information misreports (in dump file).
* Added K6-2 and K6-III logos.

Download: cpuz 1.33

:toast: :toast:
04-05-2006, 05:10 AM
Skyline GT-R

Mascaras, he is already using CPU-Z 1.33 ;)

And VERY nice results VW, conroe is looking very promissing :toast:
04-05-2006, 05:19 AM
El Snorro

@VictorWang

To fix cpu-z displaying wrong vcore open the cpuz.ini (in your cpuz folder) and you will see
VCore=0
set that tot
VCore=1

And than the problem should be solved.:)
04-05-2006, 05:23 AM
mine

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by iboomalot

I want to see a screen shot like this one of your 54.4 secs dual Pi

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...32m_24m19s.jpg

no way you are doing a 18 min 32m and 54.4 sec 8m it doesn't scale that way.

also says test 1 was aborted in that screen shot you posted too.

18 min 32 ???????

yonah is scratching 17 min. air cooled

yours: amd 64 FX-60@3 GHz.....24 min 19
........ intel yonah....@3 GHz.... 18 min 05

does it hurt ?
04-05-2006, 05:35 AM
jebo_4jc

Shame on FCG and Fugger for getting our hopes up :mad:

My advice is, next time your "source" says you *might* be able to get an ES working on a current motherboard *if* you get lucky, don't ejaculate all over yourselves with excitement, and spread the word that "CONROE BENCHES INCOMING" until you actually get something working.

I feel like this was purely a publicity stunt to increase the XS readership, and it appears to have worked. Now I just feel like I have been cheated.
04-05-2006, 05:36 AM
NiCKE^

LOL that's better then AMD WR 32M ;)
04-05-2006, 05:39 AM
Gonwee

Quote:

Originally Posted by jebo_4jc

Shame on FCG and Fugger for getting our hopes up :mad:

My advice is, next time your "source" says you *might* be able to get an ES working on a current motherboard *if* you get lucky, don't ejaculate all over yourselves with excitement, and spread the word that "CONROE BENCHES INCOMING" until you actually get something working.

I feel like this was purely a publicity stunt to increase the XS readership, and it appears to have worked. Now I just feel like I have been cheated.

They didn't say benchs incoming, they said they were getting conroes. And they've said many times that they don't owe anybody anything.

And why do people have to replace sex with computer hardware?
04-05-2006, 05:42 AM
VictorWang

Quote:

Originally Posted by El Snorro

@VictorWang

To fix cpu-z displaying wrong vcore open the cpuz.ini (in your cpuz folder) and you will see
VCore=0
set that tot
VCore=1

And than the problem should be solved.:)

tried...but...no use :(
everest ultimate v2.8 can show the correct vcore
04-05-2006, 05:42 AM
chrisf6969

Quote:

Originally Posted by thegreek

where did you find this info in that PDF?

Sorry I posted wrong link before. I'll go back & edit that post. Here is the correct .pdf about the changes to support Conroe : http://developer.intel.com/design/pc...D/D1060560.pdf
04-05-2006, 05:43 AM
mine

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

LOL that's better then AMD WR 32M ;)

yes , I know

:toast: :toast: :toast:
04-05-2006, 05:50 AM
tsuehpsyde

Quote:

Originally Posted by jebo_4jc

Shame on FCG and Fugger for getting our hopes up :mad:

My advice is, next time your "source" says you *might* be able to get an ES working on a current motherboard *if* you get lucky, don't ejaculate all over yourselves with excitement, and spread the word that "CONROE BENCHES INCOMING" until you actually get something working.

I feel like this was purely a publicity stunt to increase the XS readership, and it appears to have worked. Now I just feel like I have been cheated.

Wow, you sure are a douchebag over something you don't deserve. Next time, get an ES chip yourself and get them working. Oh, wait, you can't even look at an ES, let alone touch or use one. :p: ES are quirky for a reason: They're Engineering Samples. The fact that users in these forums already have them in their hands is a grace. Learn some god damn patience, kid.
04-05-2006, 05:52 AM
VictorWang

reinstalled the OS,
all benchmark results will be updated.
huge improvement in SISoft
04-05-2006, 05:52 AM
NiCKE^

Any SuperPi improvements? :D
04-05-2006, 05:53 AM
chrisf6969

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeguava

Time to look into modding the P5WD2-E to reduce startup vcore.

The 0403 BIOS allows lower voltage....

:stick: FCG, FUGGER have you tried this unreleased 0403 BIOS
04-05-2006, 05:55 AM
VictorWang

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

Any SuperPi improvements? :D

superpi comes more stable, 21.4sec for 5times.
will come pi_32m later
04-05-2006, 05:58 AM
ubi

Quote:

Originally Posted by VictorWang

all benchmark results will be updated.

With Cinebench 2003?

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page