1090T 1010MPMW on dry ice
http://i.imgur.com/3FYJN.png
Efficiency is ok, not poor like the current score I have on the table. Don't know why I scored so low last time.
Printable View
1090T 1010MPMW on dry ice
http://i.imgur.com/3FYJN.png
Efficiency is ok, not poor like the current score I have on the table. Don't know why I scored so low last time.
My 1055T on normal water
http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/119/cb64ps.png
Popped my 980 BE in last night. Had a little time tonight to see what the King of Deneb's is capable of. Just on a simple Mugen 2 here:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...0MhzRAM-CB.jpg
nice scores....We can go higher, 980 BE with 1.45V is good, try it with 1.55V!
Forgot to save screenie when benchmarking but saved results and here is 4.3Ghz result.
http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/9125/test3u.th.png
Heavy on optimizations regarding hardware.
I can run it 4.7Ghz CPU, 3.29Ghz NB, 3.29Ghz HT and get that 9+ or even 10+ with luck.
Strange tough, more voltage i supply to cpu, better score i get :D
And cooling...? What is at CPU-Z in right corner? Red, grey and green spot?
4.7 GHz is not possible in R11.5 with x6 1090T and aircooled
btw, maybe first results with AMD A8-3850 here?:) 1112 APM, 1.465V, 3538 MHz, BOX BE cooler
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9...hr115llano.png
Oh I'm far from done. Just getting started in fact. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
Normally, you'd need 5.7 - 5.8GHz for 10+, I think. Your result looks strangely high for the 4.3GHz you've shown. Is that really 4.3GHz?Quote:
Originally Posted by rintamarotta
If you can run it 4.7GHz, why you've run it only at 4.3?
What are these heavy hardware optimizations? What is the memory?
Not trying to be an аsshole, just want to have more info :).
This.Quote:
Originally Posted by I.nfraR.ed
Unless you're aware of some way to unlock hidden performance in a Thuban setup, your results do not seem accurate. Cinebench scales perfectly well with cores, clock speed, etc. so you can almost calculate exactly what your score will be based off all of the settings in the BIOS assuming there are no software changes impacting performance.
I think, it is not possible. Im tweaking Thuban great and I can hit more than 7.78MHz with a bit higher clocks and fresh OS
He could be running 2030 CL6 and NB @ 3.3 or something O_o
I doubt that score.
Right, if we use scores posted here seems to takes a bit more then 4.3GHz to break into the 8's!Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
Code:
Name /Post# Score Cooling CPU MHz
chinook /285 8.12 H20 X6 1090T 4552
Wez /180 8.11 H20 X6 1090T 4578
Zeus /139 8.02 H20 X6 1090T 4467
paolo.oliva2 /201 8.02 H20 X6 1090T 4492
Titan7171 /113 7.98 ? X6 1090T 4500
crazydiamond /319 7.92 H20 X6 1100T 4425
Daveburt714 /318 7.92 H20 X6 1090T 4455
The Weedman /152 7.91 ? X6 1055T 4452
crazydiamond /176 7.89 ? X6 1090T 4402
Barr3l Rid3r /246 7.85 H20 X6 1090T 4410
moorhen2 /342 7.84 H20 X6 1100T 4410
PatRaceTin /377 7.83 H20 X6 1055T 4409
Daveburt714 /213 7.82 H20 X6 1055T 4368
FlanK3r /284 7.78 AIR X6 1090T 4360
moorhen2 /143 7.71 H20 X6 1090T 4314
richierich /60 7.63 ? X6 1055T 4340
Test Range: 4340MHz to 8.12 Points
Avg Score: 7.90
Avg MHz: 4433.38
Ok, I ran the benchmark with Intel CPU (don't have AMD in the office, sorry about that), but intentionally forgot to take a screenshot. However here's the result. There are heavy hardware optimizations. The strange thing here is lower voltage I supply, higher score I get (the opposite to the rintamarotta's tweak).
http://i.imgur.com/lgism.png
It's extremely easy to edit the score and frequency. Unless you show us a screenshot with completed benchmark, a score at the top left corner and a cpuz windows (cpu and memory tabs), I say your score is complete bull:banana::banana::banana::banana:. Shame on you!
I won't accept any new score as valid (for myself), that doesn't comply the forementioned rules.
PS: Just for reference, here's what took me to get 8.11 on water cooling
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post4624565
Rintamarotta telling bulls ? No, impossible ... :ROTF:
Heyyy Flank3r...I'm coming for you. ;-)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...RAM-SP1522.jpg
very nice for Deneb, I tried yesterday a bit R11.5
my result, as Rinta, it is stock BOX cooler :D...No, seriously, LN2 quick run. It is very hard for time learn to Cinebenchs under LN2 (some cores can be whorse...)
Attachment 120661
Need to put the box cooler, too :). Hope it will be soon and push 6+ GHz. My Thuban is very balanced one, no weak cores or if I look from another perspective - no really good core, so it's good for 3D and multithread.
nice Infra!Think, yours Thuban looks great. Newt time Il must playing more with cores and find the weaker cores
My thuban is no match for your thubans :(
I can only do 4.2 in Cinebench...
my 1090 did 4400mhz & 1100 did 4425mhz on my h2o with normal ambients :up: the 1090 took me hours to get 4400, my 1100 is a hell of a chip but has 1 weak core otherwise it could have went higher i think
Yeah, I would need ~1.65v+ for 4400 Mhz assuming the chip scaled with voltage...Quote:
Originally Posted by crazydiamond
I'll lay off on that :d
4.23 @ 1.54v load gave me a pleasant BSOD
I think both of mine were over 1.6v @ load,, took about 600cfm worth of fans on high fpi rads to tame the beasts :D
"Well, in that case, I'll give it a go!"Quote:
Originally Posted by crazydiamond
XD
*talks to self*
"If the CPU pops, it pops...BD is around the corner Beep, you can throw in your 565 if need be."
I like Diamonds Thuban:)...Hope, he dont sell out :). Think, with air maybe he can hit about 4250- 4300 MHz stable too
check that, the 1090 was over 1.6v @ load, the 1100 was around 1.55v @ load :eek: