dude, u forgot to put this pic too
http://members.iinet.net.au/~zzhang/L12mod.jpg
it's a bit clearer than that artistic shot i took hehe :P
Printable View
dude, u forgot to put this pic too
http://members.iinet.net.au/~zzhang/L12mod.jpg
it's a bit clearer than that artistic shot i took hehe :P
10x for the pic, nice shot
Can you tell me where the golden arrow was toward? I wanted to add something like that so people ca see better where the pins are on the cpu.
top left, so the shown area is the bottom right bit of the cpu
10x a lot Ragnarok for your help, it'll make the mod easier to understand
hey, they still got 2100+'s at newegg for 62 dollars. would this be a good choice in terms of overclocking and all? its either that or a duron 1.6 or a 1800+..
Hi
I just popped in a 2500 Barton AQXEA 0331 inplace of my venerable 2100 Tbred "B" which easily did 2400 mhz (230 x 10.5) @ 1.85 vcore.
My question is with this Barton, what happened to the 10-10.5 multipliers?
I am not complaining as this 2500 is currently doing 11 x 230 @ 1.9 and seems to be stable.
I am running a NF7-S rev 2.0
I,ve since flashed the bios, and although I returned back to the bios that allowed for the above speed, the Barton will no longer run at those settings. The 10-10.5 's are long gone.
That is a question that many have asked, and I am yet to hear a consistent answer.Quote:
Originally posted by lght1
Hi
I just popped in a 2500 Barton AQXEA 0331 inplace of my venerable 2100 Tbred "B" which easily did 2400 mhz (230 x 10.5) @ 1.85 vcore.
My question is with this Barton, what happened to the 10-10.5 multipliers?
I am not complaining as this 2500 is currently doing 11 x 230 @ 1.9 and seems to be stable.
I am running a NF7-S rev 2.0
taco-go with a barton 2500 or a 1700xp if you can't spend the extra few bucks. They both seem to oc better, and the newest batch of 2500's seem to oc the best, and aren't much money.
Hi all, I hope you can help me.
I have an NF7-Sv2.0 and a 400Mhz Barton 3000.
Does anyone know if L12 and or cutting bridges to make this 200 processor behave like a 166 or 133 processor would help me get more FSB?
Details, links, or advice would be greatly appreciated!
lallend i doubt it would help, as i've stated this mod works only for 133fsb cpu's unless you have a rev1.2 board (which is not your case)
is the mod hard to do?
nope.... read thru the thread and it's all explained.
........it all explained in the 1st post. I'm sure you just missed it when you read it the first time ;) ..................Quote:
Originally posted by newkid
is the mod hard to do?
yeah...that's it;)Quote:
Originally posted by BBThumper
........it all explained in the 1st post. I'm sure you just missed it when you read it the first time ;) ..................
it is funny how I have actually read every single page of this mod, and it couldn't get any easier, but yet I still have not done it...:toast:
i got to looking at the model 10 tech sheets and for 200 fsb fsb sense 1 =0 and fsb sense 2=0 however on the model 8 its listed as reserved with no fsb listed and on the modle 10 the former 100 fsb which is fsb sense1= 1 and fsb sense2=0 is now reserved.... which leads me to wonder if the former 100 fsb might be 233 fsb on a next release? what do you all think?
Would this mod work on a 1800+ XP Palomino .18 micron chip? I have a MSI KT3 Ultra Motherboard.
Read the first post it's written that the mod is only for nf7 and tbred!Quote:
Originally posted by askme-starfox
Would this mod work on a 1800+ XP Palomino .18 micron chip? I have a MSI KT3 Ultra Motherboard.
I haven't understand a thing of your post!Quote:
Originally posted by tennvols_69
i got to looking at the model 10 tech sheets and for 200 fsb fsb sense 1 =0 and fsb sense 2=0 however on the model 8 its listed as reserved with no fsb listed and on the modle 10 the former 100 fsb which is fsb sense1= 1 and fsb sense2=0 is now reserved.... which leads me to wonder if the former 100 fsb might be 233 fsb on a next release? what do you all think?
No, it will not help. Tried it already and so have others with no improvement. Even hurt some.Quote:
Originally posted by lallend
Hi all, I hope you can help me.
I have an NF7-Sv2.0 and a 400Mhz Barton 3000.
Does anyone know if L12 and or cutting bridges to make this 200 processor behave like a 166 or 133 processor would help me get more FSB?
Details, links, or advice would be greatly appreciated!
You have to flash back to the 10 bios to get them. Get the 10d if you are running sataQuote:
Originally posted by gouda96
That is a question that many have asked, and I am yet to hear a consistent answer.
taco-go with a barton 2500 or a 1700xp if you can't spend the extra few bucks. They both seem to oc better, and the newest batch of 2500's seem to oc the best, and aren't much money.
Like many others seem to have, i tried this mod on my 2500 barton and it dod nothing, zip, nada, bugger all, well it did someting, changed my max overclock,did 2450mhz before the mod and guess what it did after the mod?
2380mhz :mad:
Flipping thing, ah well, out comes the cleaner :p
Next time read the first page, it's written clearly that this mod is only for TBRED CPU and not for barton!!!Quote:
Originally posted by Bundles
Like many others seem to have, i tried this mod on my 2500 barton and it dod nothing, zip, nada, bugger all, well it did someting, changed my max overclock,did 2450mhz before the mod and guess what it did after the mod?
2380mhz :mad:
Flipping thing, ah well, out comes the cleaner :p
I doubt it, they put it as reserved coz there arent any 200 FSB Tbreds and 100 FSB bartons (I assume they left 133 in there for the thorton)..Quote:
Originally posted by tennvols_69
i got to looking at the model 10 tech sheets and for 200 fsb fsb sense 1 =0 and fsb sense 2=0 however on the model 8 its listed as reserved with no fsb listed and on the modle 10 the former 100 fsb which is fsb sense1= 1 and fsb sense2=0 is now reserved.... which leads me to wonder if the former 100 fsb might be 233 fsb on a next release? what do you all think?
200 FSB will prob be the last of the socket A's...
I just did it on my 1800+ and it worked.
I painted it on and no probs. I tried dropping wire in the holes before but I think I tied the wrong holes.
I also tried the 8bit L3 mod but I tried that on the bridges on the top of the cpu.
That didnt work from what I can tell.
Ill try it the next I have the cpu out on the bottom this time.
I have to go test this thing .
Later
Wardog
Well my 1800 was chipped by the weight of my copper heatsink and 92mm tornado.
Everything was going great after the mod then BAM.
All settings became unstable. Heat startd to go way up etc.
Well I thought I didnt seat something properly so I took it all apart. Then I was looking at the heatsink and saw little specks of sand.
Not really sand though, silicon is what it was.
Weird it still booted up into windows and I could run for a few minutes then crash. I thought it would just not work at all.
So now I have a new 1800 JIXIB this time. The last one was a jiuhb. So far very stable and very little volts.
Stable upto 2100mhz at stock Vcore.
Also have the fsb at 235 priming stable so far right now.
Before with the other processor and all voltages maxed and modded(not L12 mod just vmods.) I could only run stable at 225.
Well more tests awaiting.
Later
Wardog
Hey All.
Well this is a follow up to an earlyer post i did. I recently did the L12 & 8bit mods to a second of two 1700+ DLT3C's i got from eXcaiberpc before they ran out. As in my first post this one also
shows user defined & 3200+ in the bios. actually when it first boots up it only shows user defined then once i go above 200fsb it shows 3200+. both chips will run @ 11x200fsb with stock volts.
so far the first one has gone 2725mhz @ 2.2v. the second right now is at 2610mhz @ only 1.725v. the first is prime stable the second isnt prime stable yet but is stable enough to run 3DMark. im hoping this one will hit 2900mhz or better.:D