4 cores in 1,Conroe E6600 8Mb Cache,Kentsfield result@MSI 975X

I agree, dual core should finaly catch on soon for games I think 07 shall be the dual core revolution.

I was very hardcore into single core when I got my 146 and 148 I knew I didnt need a dual core, now history repeats with quad core.

I would think maybe one or two big hit titles will be used to get 4 core technology out to the masses but for the majority of games it wont be a issue till probably late 08'

But that doesnt mean quad core wont have a purpose for sombody who uses professional programs that can use all 4 cores, or heck running 2 programs at once that use dual core and being able to manually assign cpu use.

For a gamer tho, I look at quad core as a way to get cheaper dual cores.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stealthbomber

Wow, quad core sample already...

---

Only for the Jedi Coolaler :) .

The CPU introduced in this Thread doesn't seem to be a Kentsfield -living in Taiwan doesn't proove that you have some connection the automatically way. The Kentsfield is being developed in Germany if I can trust this site here=
http://hardware.thgweb.de/2006/09/11...re/page28.html
"Entwicklungszentrum für Multi-Core Braunschweig". Translated= "Dev. Laboratories for Multicore in Brunswick (Germany)"

I didn't see any proof of a Kentsfield in here (except the 4-Core entry being shown in CPUz, but where is the 2x4MB shared L2 Cache huh?).

This should be the final design of the Kentsfield (English and not the complete Report)
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/09/...on_the_rampage

This is the complete Report from THG Germany (this includes the pics from the laboratory in Germany, so this explains why the UK Report isn't complete in comparison with this=
http://hardware.thgweb.de/2006/09/11...ore/index.html

You obvsiously have no idea who coolaler is and what he does (for a living?).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelbsucht

The CPU introduced in this Thread doesn't seem to be a Kentsfield -living in Taiwan doesn't proove that you have some connection the automatically way. The Kentsfield is being developed in Germany if I can trust this site here=
http://hardware.thgweb.de/2006/09/11...re/page28.html
"Entwicklungszentrum für Multi-Core Braunschweig". Translated= "Dev. Laboratories for Multicore in Brunswick (Germany)"

I didn't see any proof of a Kentsfield in here (except the 4-Core entry being shown in CPUz, but where is the 2x4MB shared L2 Cache huh?).

This should be the final design of the Kentsfield (English and not the complete Report)
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/09/...on_the_rampage

This is the complete Report from THG Germany (this includes the pics from the laboratory in Germany, so this explains why the UK Report isn't complete in comparison with this=
http://hardware.thgweb.de/2006/09/11...ore/index.html

---

Ok junior :slap:

rofl, kentsfield is everywhere :D

who care about THG

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelbsucht

The CPU introduced in this Thread doesn't seem to be a Kentsfield -living in Taiwan doesn't proove that you have some connection the automatically way. The Kentsfield is being developed in Germany if I can trust this site here=
http://hardware.thgweb.de/2006/09/11...re/page28.html
"Entwicklungszentrum für Multi-Core Braunschweig". Translated= "Dev. Laboratories for Multicore in Brunswick (Germany)"

I didn't see any proof of a Kentsfield in here (except the 4-Core entry being shown in CPUz, but where is the 2x4MB shared L2 Cache huh?).

This should be the final design of the Kentsfield (English and not the complete Report)
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/09/...on_the_rampage

This is the complete Report from THG Germany (this includes the pics from the laboratory in Germany, so this explains why the UK Report isn't complete in comparison with this=
http://hardware.thgweb.de/2006/09/11...ore/index.html

---

You should reaaly take a look at the other post fro mthe person you're talking about before opening your mouth and sticking your foot in it. :slapass:

This just hit me.


Is this the so-called Q6600 that's suppoed to come out in January?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Torin

I don't know what coolaler does for a living, but with the amount of time he gets to spend with ES chips, It'd be nice to be him. :)

---

The grass is always greener :toast:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelbsucht

The CPU introduced in this Thread doesn't seem to be a Kentsfield -living in Taiwan doesn't proove that you have some connection the automatically way. The Kentsfield is being developed in Germany if I can trust this site here=
http://hardware.thgweb.de/2006/09/11...re/page28.html
"Entwicklungszentrum für Multi-Core Braunschweig". Translated= "Dev. Laboratories for Multicore in Brunswick (Germany)"

I didn't see any proof of a Kentsfield in here (except the 4-Core entry being shown in CPUz, but where is the 2x4MB shared L2 Cache huh?).

This should be the final design of the Kentsfield (English and not the complete Report)
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/09/...on_the_rampage

This is the complete Report from THG Germany (this includes the pics from the laboratory in Germany, so this explains why the UK Report isn't complete in comparison with this=
http://hardware.thgweb.de/2006/09/11...ore/index.html

---

One word.

IDIOT

one smilie


:D

That was rich :)

crikes...
:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelbsucht

The CPU introduced in this Thread doesn't seem to be a Kentsfield -living in Taiwan doesn't proove that you have some connection the automatically way. The Kentsfield is being developed in Germany if I can trust this site here=
http://hardware.thgweb.de/2006/09/11...re/page28.html
"Entwicklungszentrum für Multi-Core Braunschweig". Translated= "Dev. Laboratories for Multicore in Brunswick (Germany)"

I didn't see any proof of a Kentsfield in here (except the 4-Core entry being shown in CPUz, but where is the 2x4MB shared L2 Cache huh?).

This should be the final design of the Kentsfield (English and not the complete Report)
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/09/...on_the_rampage

This is the complete Report from THG Germany (this includes the pics from the laboratory in Germany, so this explains why the UK Report isn't complete in comparison with this=
http://hardware.thgweb.de/2006/09/11...ore/index.html

---

LOL

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by S&M

AMAZING RESULTS AS ALWAYS !!!

btw - will this cpu be supported by Bad Axe rev 304 ?

can someone tell ?

---

I would like to know this also ?

FFS... Very nice :cool:
Kentsfield will be my next step..K8L seems far away atm (Q2 2K7 and I cant wait that long). Have my 4400 for 14 months now and I believe it will serve me well till this baby will be available.. :)

I'd like to see some gaming benches with a Kentsfield though..That would be interesting..

Seems like this chip will be very quick, when released, it should really stamp the of Conroe and Allendale, which is good for poor people! I will probably go Conroe when Kent comes out, will be a big performance increase for me :p. Seems like the chip will be stupidly quick! Lets hope games start supporting more than 2 cores!

Ruan

Apart from 'Alan Wake' I cant imagine any game needing 4 cores, I can barely think of any that need 2. That'll be another year at least I reckon

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelbsucht

The CPU introduced in this Thread doesn't seem to be a Kentsfield -living in Taiwan doesn't proove that you have some connection the automatically way. The Kentsfield is being developed in Germany if I can trust this site here=
http://hardware.thgweb.de/2006/09/11...re/page28.html
"Entwicklungszentrum für Multi-Core Braunschweig". Translated= "Dev. Laboratories for Multicore in Brunswick (Germany)"

I didn't see any proof of a Kentsfield in here (except the 4-Core entry being shown in CPUz, but where is the 2x4MB shared L2 Cache huh?).

This should be the final design of the Kentsfield (English and not the complete Report)
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/09/...on_the_rampage

This is the complete Report from THG Germany (this includes the pics from the laboratory in Germany, so this explains why the UK Report isn't complete in comparison with this=
http://hardware.thgweb.de/2006/09/11...ore/index.html

---

It prolly was developped in Germany, but I gotta tell you that there are a lot...I really mean "A LOT" ES version of kentsfield floating around on the market, you obviously don't know who da hell is Coolaler -_-"

You guys should drop it already. So he made a mistake.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lowrider007

I would like to know this also ?

---

Count me in. I'd like to know also. Although I've seen it benched on a badaxe 304, there have been some problems it appears in getting it to overclock as well as on other 975 boards and on the badaxe 2. Even though it appears to work, will the regular badaxe fully and officially support kentsfield?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nosfer@tu

AMD would do :banana::banana::banana::banana: this year.

They even said so them selfs, That 2006 will not be a good year for AMD!
My personal opinion, though many others are more quilified is, Amd will catch up around Q3 2007, But just gessing :)

---

yeah, i doubt that since Intel is projected to release 8 core Yorkfield (45nm) and wolfdale (45nm) Q3 of 2k7... while AMD is projected to release a 4 core and 2 core mainstream coming out at 2.0-2.9Ghz, while the wolfdale comes out projected at 3.5-4.0 Ghz............ no way does it seem like AMD is going to catch up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Slycer

You guys should drop it already. So he made a mistake.

---

yeah, but he sounded a little pissy and acted like he knew everything.

well if it isn't, I can't wait to see what is...

was looking all over the place for a quad core thread,now i found it