Does anyone know what kind of error is this?
Is this my CPU or memory?
Printable View
Does anyone know what kind of error is this?
Is this my CPU or memory?
First run under the prommy (after I stuffed up the first install) :D
http://home.exetel.com.au/codered/fx53/pifast38.20.jpg
Just need a bit more fine tuning and I'll break 38 sec ;)
I know Tom in person and i know that he has done something on A8V that is truly amazing. When he comes home from his family holidays i garranty you he will post it.
thats awesome, there are a bunch of us that would love to know how to fix the OVP problem .... A digi cam pic of his board and the OVP mod would be GREATLY APPRECIATED :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by JacobHansen
most likely cpu errorQuote:
Originally Posted by kakaroto
here's my fastest time ever prior was 46.44s
http://www.fileshosts.com/AMD/DFI/60...2683_45.59.jpg
well there is no doubt the a8v is a good mb but not even close to being the best since you cant get over 3.0vdimm... For stock use i would agree its the best.. but until we can all use vdimm above 3.0v its definately not the best board for overclocking.. have to stay with nf3 for high 1:1 ddr speeds...Quote:
Originally Posted by µnrealneo²
for TCCD 3v is quite enough for DDR600Quote:
Originally Posted by CCC
high timings maybeQuote:
Originally Posted by blinky
tom, could u share the mod with us even if its a board killer?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Holck
are u saying u have the OVP modded? or did u somehow find bug that lets u past it with the booster?
too many fast scores so I will even it out by posting my nice and slow one:
http://www.finaldrivemagazine.com/andy/pifast.jpg
:lol: even it out ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by FDM
You are the man...! :D
Getting close to my score, try harder man :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by FDM
http://home.planet.nl/~dikke332/4947.jpg
39,81 with 2961 Mhz
Quick run to test out my new Av8, 300 1:1 3949mhz on my FX53 4.2vdimm
http://24.158.154.102/images/31.97.jpg
yuri 4.2v vdimm :eek:
Whoa dont :banana::banana::banana::banana: with me like that, I think my heart almost stopped, you must mean 2949mhz almost 4ghz on a FX-53 is crazy fast! BTW this is BH-5 2-2-2-5 @ 300mhz? Nice work with the 4.2vdimm :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by yuri
it.. sounds like your joking, but the screenie doesnt look fakeQuote:
Originally Posted by yuri
if its real then :slobber:
I think a 4ghz FX-53 would be faster than that, but I dont know pifast at all, I think thats due the all the mem bandwidth he has...
is he joking or what?
I just soiled myself :slobber:Quote:
Originally Posted by yuri
That is absolutely f*cking insane :toast:
LN2 cooling?
Mem timings must be very loose to hit 300 MHz on a S939
Yes but then why would he run 4.2v? Nobody puts that much through any ram except bh-5, please give us more details!
Yuri I don't know how you did that , but congrats man......You are one of your kind in Photochop.......or you have manipulate the calculations in Pi-Fast..... :D
You should also "correct" the other times as well so as to be believed.....For example : You should do the 4.17 - 2.52 - 1.70 less than that compared with the others..... ;)
The timings dont quite match up for 13x, unless the ram is running very slack timings, but then again running 300 Mhz would require very loose timingsQuote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
13x303 with super timings could achieve 30.58 sec, but I must now go and test 3-4-4-8-2T ;)
Even with very loose timings on Ram , it's not possible.....You can't have that score on the first bench and on the other three ones geting those crappy scores.... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by CodeRed
I see now ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
its an error: if u compare the score side by side, ull see that his series computing time is FAR below all the others, but his Division time, InvSqrt time, and final huge multiplication time are high than supposedly low clocks, and higher pifast scores. that does not make sense
look Pedro Rocha's:
http://ricky.home.sapo.pt/fx53/pifast3550.JPG
and yuri's
http://24.158.154.102/images/31.97.jpg
so yuri series computing time must have a bug in it, and that affected his scores by making them go waaay down, even with higher calculation and division, and invSqrt times. BUG!!!
Nice compare Blinky :) .
Defiantly a bug.
New pifast ,but cpu or mobo is dead now,this was with vdimm at 3.5v.
Can I ask one thing here and that is feel free to question results but
please do not accuse people of doing the impossible!!!
As someone myself heavy into Voltmods and 1st person to Crack open some specials
to the overclocking community please do not think there are not ways around Over/under Volt & current protection Tom i'm sure like myself will withhold information if it gains him an advantage, i've done it myself and for anyone who has a decent
understanding of electronics they could do away with any on-board Voltage control anyway.
If I think something is a miss i'll either withhold a result pending a request to the user
for additional info, or i'll put up a result if its borderline to my checks in the view that
if I think its duff at a later date it will be removed.
A submitted result for a A64 3800mhz is not going to go up unless proved as its way
beyond the norm and alarm bells ring it's then down to the user to prove it and pass
back information that 100% meets my expectations.
There are alot of people who attempt to slip something in, since its not real time
results its a wasted effort and submitting a time of 1sec ain't ever going to happen
but funny enough there mainly people with Hotmail addies.
There are alot of people here I trust and have proven to me over time a great
honesty for the information they submit, its thanks to these people that I can
weed out the fakes as there result give a trusted trend that can be followed
and compared against.
Its all a bit of fun and more fun when played fare when you know your result
is genuine, I know I have great pride in what I achieve knowing I did it and did
it honestly.
There are some really mad people out there distroying there computers to gain
what many regard impossible, its not impossible its just not having the knowledge
to know how to over come, however there will always be someone who finds out
how.... but also might wan't to keep it to themselves for a bit.
So my moral is ask for evidence but never accuse a liar always trips up and for me
if it happens they have every result submitted stripped and will be named and shamed ;)
PMM, that's the right way you're going :thumbsup:
I definately know what it takes to decrease the pifast time about 1second!!! It's truely incredible, there's a cpu/cooling/board doing that shown time actually.
He should prove it with a lot more benches... at least superpi should be cake as pifast is way more cpu dependant :D
Relax guys........None called anynone a lier........We all "play" in here.......One plays fair.....other not......not a big deal.......Me for example was in the first place of Pi-Fast a couple of moons........Now I'm 15 - 20 - I don't remember....So what?.....Life is going on..... :D
no one called anyone a liar,
just sayin its so fantastic i want more specs
It might be a good idea for people to post a CPU-Z shot (showing the codes at the bottom left) together with their pifast screenie so that overclocks can be verified ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by blinky
IMO this should be mandatory for all top 20 players.
i concur, and he hasnt posted anything besides that one screenieQuote:
Originally Posted by CodeRed
SPEAK YURI!
For info i've not had that result from Yuri Submitted ;)
I Always side on belief that some can be true, I did get caught out once
as I had a result from a German person that I just deleted this was a 3500mhz
speed some 300mhz+ higher than the lads here at the time, I realise now that
the result was genuine but since I deleted it I can't put it up I never contacted
the person because I dis-believed it.
So its is very much down to giving all the proof you can if your up there in the
dizzy heights of the Top20 ;)
Yep. True spoken. I would never post such a bench without verification through cpuz at least :)Quote:
Originally Posted by PMM
So Yuri, please don't let us wait. Or maybe you just wanna yell: JJJOOOOKE!!! :lol: ;)
Anyone with LGA prescott tried running this program? Its very weird it gives an error before running the program on my 3.6E with Abit AS8.
Edit: It works but it sux on the prescotts :p
Yes indeed........S-Sandra Arithmetic and Pi-Fast - any version - sucks as for the Prescott CPU's......There is "something" missing as for these benchies I think...... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by LardArse
Hey Hipro whats the missing link?? :D
27s superpi but 41.39s pifast with P4EE
25s superpi but 42s pifast with prescott
:p:
Yes I've noticed that too.....No go for Pi-Fast as for Prescott CPU's......Pi-Fast maybe an old version BUT newer versions does the same thing.......I think that it must be some new instractions of the Prescott that the Pi-Fast progie isn't capable to "follow".........who knows...... :DQuote:
Originally Posted by LardArse
My score:
http://members.home.nl/epsilon/temp/...293_3700EB.jpg
Specs:
A64 3400+ Newcastle @ 10x293 (1.845v)
Prom Mach1@ r507
Lanparty NF250 UT
OCZ PC3700EB @ 293mhz 1:1 (3.5v :D )
Ok i have finally found the max of this board (Asus A8V), here is a 14x303 (FX53@ 4242Mhz) 2/3/2/5/11/16 4.2 vdimm / 2.3vcore
http://24.158.154.102/images/26.84.jpg
I dont believe u
sorry...
I think u are using pifast 4.3 :stick:
try superpi 1M please at 4200MHz --> 15-20s
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by cpulloverclock
Me neither :D
That's too unrealistic... no comments on cooling, no cpuz, no other benches. :(
:eek: Whats the cooling? Got a Superpi? Also any pictures of the setup and more evidence, thats way faster than anyone before!Quote:
Originally Posted by yuri
Yeah right!
Why do you use a danish version of PiFast to start with?
Are you danish?
2.3Vcore and 4.2Vdimm? uh huh :stick:
Tell us another one...
Oh come on Yuri, surely you can do better than that ... 5GHz must be easy with photochop :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by yuri
under 50sec now:
http://www.finaldrivemagazine.com/andy/4944.jpg
That's what I call realistic and honest :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by FDM
:D ;)
of course! All my scores are slow enough to be believed even if i was making them up :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by SAE
OMG :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by FDM
I got 11x256 and 49.47 :confused:
Very nice score FDM :toast: :slobber:
There's no Danish version, only difference is the Kboard lang i.e. theQuote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
screen shot just say's in his own native lang. 'Press any key to continue'
Same prog just differenet versions exist more optimized so it more than likely version 4.3 generating that result.
I think if the Windows is fully expanded the text at the top your not seeing will include the version that pifast is ;)
here is mine
xp-m 2600+ 3.17ghz 215fsb :stick:
http://homepage.uvt.nl/~s304879/pifast1.jpg
you sure you're running hexus pifast and not another version of pifast ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Xassius
whoops...you're right...I remembered..this is 4.3 PiFast and not 4.1 ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
new personal best:
http://www.finaldrivemagazine.com/andy/pifast4916.jpg
LOL..Quote:
Originally Posted by Xassius
well new personal best before was 45.20s now my best is = 44.70s
http://www.fileshosts.com/AMD/DFI/60...fast_44-70.jpg
Hehe... I am faster ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
3200+
DFI Lanparty UT
Stock Prom M2
Mushkin PC3500
http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~vnrswk/4267.jpg
WR S754 aircooled
http://kaine.studentenweb.org/270.JPG
44.95 sec
AMD64 3400+ Clawhammer @ 1.55 + 113%
1x256 Mushkin BH5 @ 3.5V 1:1
DFI UT NF3 250GB
So the WR for AXP and A64 S754 on air is mine :)
super pi 1m I get 36
A bit of improvement after switching to the MSI board :D
http://home.exetel.com.au/codered/fx53/pifast37.11.jpg
Damn Codered! that´s a nice cpu you got there :toast:
did you do any mods to the board?
Gonna get me a Msi too soon :D
Only did the Vdimm/3.3V bypass modQuote:
Originally Posted by Jack
easiest MHz I ever got :D
Looking good mate :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by CodeRed
Which MSI board?
the K8N Neo2Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikita
WR aircooling overall:
43.84 sec
http://kaine.studentenweb.org/275.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaLDoL
Trc @7 and Tras @2??
You changed settings after you did the run to confuse us all didn't ya?
I get 44.23 sec aircooled at 243x11 1:1 w/ 3500 0.09u.
No I didn't. Why would I wanna do that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
Not quite a WR, but a damn find job none the lessQuote:
Originally Posted by HaLDoL
this is my FX53 on air (stock HSF too):
http://home.exetel.com.au/codered/fx53/pifast2695.jpg
Just when you think you got it really going, there's CodeRed... :D
Good job to the both of you, i'm sure HalDoL got something left.
heheheheQuote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
I am sure someone with a FX55 could blow that score out of the water anyway. Quite a few FX55's are doing > 2.9 on air, anything like 11x265 would be sub 41 sec.
OK no WR overall then :D
Still a S754 record :)
:lol: :lol: :up: .Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
a few more MHz :)
http://home.exetel.com.au/codered/fx53/pifast36.92.jpg
Damn, how come you can hit 2700 on air with the stock HSF?! :slobber: I mean, this is nuts, that's what I reach with my TDX and 30°C :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by CodeRed
On air, I managed ~2550 MHz on my FX-53. Anything above that would be unstable. 2600 would crash...
System upgrade == score update :D
40.80s atm
http://members.home.nl/youpy/s939prom1_small.jpg
And there is more to come :D I only need to put the Vcore mod on and I seriously need some better mem. It's only running @ DDR500. I need like 2 x 256 instead of 2 x 512 to get DDR 300 at 1T
Its one of the newer FX53, week 33. They seem to be 100 MHz faster than the older ones. But then again the FX55's are 200 MHz faster again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonmike
FX55@3724 MSI-939 at 2.032 volt
The cascade going -125 C
Man thats tryuly amazing Tom :toast:
You have the pifast record back, now go for 22sec SuperPi 1M
Done M8!Quote:
Originally Posted by CodeRed
http://www16.big.or.jp/~bunnywk/cgi-bin/superpi.cgi
:) :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Holck
you are insane
and what does it give in screenshot? 3.9-3.95GHz?
I cant wait :banana:
Thats funny, tried some schreenie at 38xx, but it stops.Quote:
Originally Posted by cpulloverclock
I think in a few dayes, when the termal-greas stabilized.
Or the FX55 is like that.. :rolleyes:
Yippie Kie YayQuote:
Originally Posted by Tom Holck
U think that you can do a 8 and 32M?
OMG Tom, completely insane. I hope you can do ~4 Ghz stable enouhg for PiFast ie superpi or anything you can get screenie stable
He,he,he..........That's INSANE my friend......... :D :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Holck
NICE Super-Pi TOO....... ;) :toast:
Wow, insane score Tom :slobber:
Hope you can squeeze some more mhz from the cpu :p:
might try some higher FSB/RAm with a little relaxed timings :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by erik9287nl
12 x 310 might be OK
Extreme there Tom :slobber:
Will be difficult to beat right now hehe :)
:worship: Tom :worship:
Tom, you are an animal man!!!!! Though scores are truely amazing :banana4:
So where did you get this cascade? :D Nice work :toast:
I had some of the worlds best Cascade-engineers to help me. I made the specifikation, test and design. It's tested and ready for sale ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by aoc007
Btw: It can take your P4@3.2 to 48xx mhz :banana:
313*12 = 33"**?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Holck
Not faster, bad ramtimings have to work at it. Cascade rest, next projeckt work at my new x800xt on the other cascade. But no time next weekend :(Quote:
Originally Posted by cpulloverclock
Now THATS some insulation :eek: 48xxMhz would be 24/7?
BTW ever tried a Winchester? It doesnt have the cache or unlocked multi of the FX but AMD 90nm seems to clock nicely.
Hmm. Ready for sale??? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Tom Holck
What would it cost like?? ;)