So Uncle, how do I use the program to show ALL 12 cores on a dual socket westmere(gulftown) system?
I know, don't ya just hate these people that show up with questions like this?:rofl:
Printable View
So Uncle, how do I use the program to show ALL 12 cores on a dual socket westmere(gulftown) system?
I know, don't ya just hate these people that show up with questions like this?:rofl:
You dual Gulftown guys were just the ones I was thinking about when it comes to "too much information."
I guess I'll have to add a switch to RealTemp GT so you can have a look at both CPUs. Maybe someday.
Thank you for the quick reply :). I hear ya about the 6 cores (can't wait). ummm a good reason (long pause...). I guess I'm just lazy ;). I just started "part-time" folding with my main machine (quad GPU's)and I'm still using the machine for simply things while folding (web, email) and it would make it easier, just to take a glance at the right bottom corner, instead of opening up Precision and see all GPU's temps at once. It's just Real Temp uses up very little resources, a big thanks to you.. Alright I tried :)... Thank youQuote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
I'll keep your request in mind.
By the way, welcome to XS. :up:
Thank you....:)Quote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
Create two instances of Real Temp, modify Tj Max and idle calibration for one of them and convince yourself that they are referring to two different CPUs. :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
RTCore.dll
Version 3.49
http://www.sendspace.com/file/y8p3cr
Just a few minor updates to the RealTemp - RivaTuner plugin including better Core i5/i7 support when not using hyper threading. It also supports the 6 core Gulftown CPUs. If I ever see a screen shot of that then maybe I'll be motivated to update the plugin to support Dual Gulftowns.
Unzip and copy RTCore.dll to the RivaTuner\PlugIns\Monitoring directory.
Open up the graphs in RivaTuner and click on the Setup button. In the Hardware monitoring Setup window, click on the PlugIns button. Make sure RTCore.dll has a check mark beside it.
The plugin includes a battery level meter for laptop owners.
http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archi...202comp_sm.htm
SANTA CLARA, Calif., Dec. 2, 2009 – Researchers from Intel Labs demonstrated an experimental, 48-core Intel processor, or "single-chip cloud computer," that rethinks many of the approaches used in today's designs for laptops, PCs and servers. This futuristic chip boasts about 10 to 20 times the processing engines inside today's most popular Intel® Core™-branded processors.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The system tray isn't big enough to monitor all of them.
I don't even want to think about two of these on the same board. :rofl:
Kevin...I think they just got you :D
BTW - I have an H55 board here but I see no GPU temp in RealTemp :D
Can you not make that Real Temp Auto detect how many cores a cpu has!! Because this is just starting..48cores is nothing..there will come even 256cores..and i have chess engines who are ready to handle 2048cores!!
I have chess engines who has no core limitation..so how more cores it sees how better :)
This is maybe a tip for future programming into your great tool!!
JP.
Uncle, is it possible to have a G15/19 integration?
That would be awesome!Quote:
Originally Posted by Razer(x)
I'll think about it. The RealTemp / RivaTuner plugin works good for this. You can use RivaTuner instead of RealTemp and the RealTemp plugin will show your Intel temps on a G15. I was doing that for a while so I wasn't sure if G15 support was really needed. I'll put it on the things to maybe do list.
I was doing some beta testing tonight and one user with a newer 5870 card was having problems with RealTemp crashing. If you have any sort of ATI card or cards in your system, could you post a screen shot of the RealTemp GPU window and let me know if this feature works. I haven't seen any problems when testing on Nvidia hardware. I'm just trying to find out how many users this problem is happening to. So far it gets one thumbs up from a 4670 owner.
http://www.sendspace.com/file/5100no
v 3.40 bug: RealTemp shows 0.00 Mhz as CPU freq, CPU is Atom 330, v 3.00 worked fine. It also say "133.86 x 0.0", so there's a bug when reading the multiplier.
http://www.stickledown.co.uk/ATI 5850.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
Is this what you need Kevin?
I have a Sapphire ATI 5850 and it all seems to work OK.
Between version 3.46 and v3.5 I have lost the ability to display the GPU temp in the Tray Info. The CPU displays OK but the GPU temp will not stick with the 'Show icon and notifications' setting. (it was working OK with 3.46 before I went to 3.5) Whatever I select it reverts to 'Only show notifications'.
(Win 764 Pro)
haha that's what ATI Eyeinfinity is for 3x2560 = 7680 horizontal resolution :DQuote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
Hi Kevin
Once again fantastic software.
Just noticed that a little issue with RealTemp 3.50. With my Quad Core Extreme Processor, if I adjust the multiplier to 9.5 or something the %load value does not read as 100% when the processor is loaded. For example a multiplier of 9.5 gives a % load of 97.4% even though the processor is @ 100% load.
The clock speed is also read incorrectly too as RealTemp says that 9.5 multi = 10 multi.
Thanks
John
ExBrat72: Thanks for the screen shot. One user had a pair of 5870 cards in Crossfire and was having problems with RealTemp starting up. RealTemp seems to work fine with single ATI cards or with x2 cards. He's going to do a W7 reinstall to see if that makes any difference since he was having a few other issues besides RealTemp.
Thanks JohnZS. Those Extreme processors always give me headaches. I'll send you a test version to see if we can finally fix this issue for you.
ekerazha: Recent versions of RealTemp have been switched to using the internal timers to determine the multiplier. This is a more accurate method except when a CPU like your Atom doesn't have any of these timers. Try adding this to your RealTemp.ini file:
MSRMulti=1
Hopefully that will use the original method. I'll try to make this automatic in future versions so if RealTemp doesn't find any working timers, it will automatically switch to this method.
I kind of like that quote John. :up:Quote:
Any problem solved is a new problem made.
I can't remember changing anything that would cause this but I'll look into it. Does this option still exist in the RealTemp Settings window? Maybe I can blame this on Windows 7. :)Quote:
Between version 3.46 and v3.5 I have lost the ability to display the GPU temp in the Tray Info.
Thanks Kevin
Ah yes those Extreme Editions can be a pain, if it isn't the extreme sensors it is the manic multipliers!
Intel certainly like to keep you on your toes ;)
That quote "Any problem solved is a new problem made" rings true for pretty much everything ;)
Thanks once again for your efforts and hardwork
John
Nope, it works perfectly for me :)Quote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
Sorted that one Kevin, put it down to me or win7...Quote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
I unchecked the GPU 'show icon' in settings, rebooted the PC and rechecked 'show icon' ... all working now - Thanks
John
I'm new to this, and 150pages is a bit much for me to read...
HWMonitor shows my load temps as 52°C, Real Temp shows 42°C. Which one do I believe?
Using RealTemp version either 3.00 or 3.40, can't remember. Will check when I get home
Post a screen shot of RealTemp and tell me some details about your processor in case the screen shot isn't obvious enough and I will tell you why different programs are reporting your core temperature differently. Intel didn't do a great job documenting how to get accurate core temperatures out of their CPUs so different programmers have made different assumptions about the specifications of your CPU.
Hi Uncle. I am having the same "problem" as mejobloggers. Its on a laptop with a Pentium T5200. It definitely doesnt feel like 74C because when my other laptop with RealTemp hits that high, I can feel heat emitting from the exhaust fan and keyboard.
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...al/Capture.jpg
This was taken with it sitting on an Antec Laptop cooler with 2x60mm fans spinning on "high."
Here is the Intel Spec for a T5200.
http://processorfinder.intel.com/det...px?sSpec=SL9VP
Thermal Specification: 100°C
Another name for thermal specification on the mobile processors is TJMax or the maximum junction temperature. Intel Core processors don't have a typical thermometer in them that software can read. They have a reverse thermometer that counts down to zero as the CPU gets hotter. On these early CPUs, there is no way to read TJMax from the CPU. All you can do is look it up on the Intel site. It's possible the Intel information I posted is wrong but for the early laptops with a CPUID = 6F6, TJMax = 100C is usually right.
Here's the formula used:
Reported Temperature = TJMax - Digital Thermal Sensor Reading
The raw data coming from the digital thermal sensor is reported in RealTemp in the Distance to TJMax boxes.
In your picture the formula would be:
Reported Temperature = 100 - 28
Reported Temperature = 72C
It's obvious that HWMonitor is using TJMax = 85C in this calculation:
Reported Temperature = 85 - 28
Reported Temperature = 57C
You have to remember that this temperature is the temperature at the hottest spot on the core and dissipates rapidly from that point. 72C on the core is not going to translate to 72C on the bottom of the laptop. Many laptops have very marginal cooling systems. They don't have the room for a large heatsink and fan so they get hot. The heatsink may not be attached snugly to the CPU in some laptops. If this is the case then the CPU can get very hot within seconds of pushing the power button.
I pulled my laptop apart and shoved a penny in there to take up some of the slack so the heatsink could make better contact with the CPU. If you pull your laptop apart and it is easy to wiggle the heatsink back and forth then that could be part of the problem with the high core temperatures you are seeing.
My wife had a Dell T7200 laptop and it used TJMax = 100C and the reported temperatures didn't look too unusual at all for a laptop.
If you are using Windows 7 or Vista, there is a setting in the Control Panel -> Power Options called Minimum processor state. That needs to be set to a low number like 5% to get your CPU to idle down properly. The CPU might be getting more core voltage than it should be at idle if this is not set correctly. In XP set the Power Schemes to Mobile / laptop processor to control this.
My opinion is that RealTemp and the Intel documentation is correct for your CPU. If you think TJMax should be set to 85 then you can manually do that in the Settings window of RealTemp but I think your reported core temperature will be less accurate if you do.