I had excactly the same message, updating to .net 4 didn't work either.Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
I re installed 3DM11 and it was fine
Printable View
I had excactly the same message, updating to .net 4 didn't work either.Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
I re installed 3DM11 and it was fine
Like every one bug combined test, bug in vantage after 3D11 installation...
(cpu@4.5ghz)
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/7800/3d11p10507.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaktus1907
Thanks :up:
3390 points.. stock 6850 and 24/7 system cpu 4000/nb2800/ mem1600 7-8-7
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/12992
Viss thanks for that > interesting :)
im disappointed that even pro version doesnt have subtest results i can view offline.........
980x 4ghz
2x 5870 stock
6gb 1880mhz 7-8-7-20-1t
-P7954 3DMarks: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/27184 :rolleyes:
-X2918 3DMarks: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/28068 :down:
stock 580 bios/cooling
http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/5828/61057992.png
my result ati5850@1090/1300
click here
can anyone explain why when I run a 3d mark the video is really tiny and only in the centre of my middle screen (eyefinity). I have tried setting it to the resolution I have and it still just gets a bunched up in the centre of my middle screen. I can't figure this out at all. Any help would be great!
Quadfire with some oldies:rolleyes:
P15127
http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/9767/3d11p15127.jpg
First time retail 980X 3013A489 clocks with single HD5870 at 4.0Ghz vs 4.2Ghz @1025/1263 - 6pts diff LOL
4GHZ = 5,086
4.2GHZ = 5,092
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P6T...51263_5092.png
I am happy the CPU doesn't matter all that much in these tests actually. This IS 3D Mark....not CPUMark....
if a new game doesn't scale in SLI/CF we wait for NVIDIA/ATI to update their drivers
how is this different? :)
wait for new drivers
We need this subtest to show offline and they need to fix the bug where you need to submit from a DX11 VGA PC instaed of saving the file and submit from any PC or Laptop , Big security flaws too. Can we have a Real FM Staff answer some questions on this tread ? I would like to herr from them on what the community needs are with this new benchmark.
Regards: Chispy.
We are having am open discussion about this in a tread in hwbot: http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=14584
i ran it on my 6850.....
completely stock - P3200
vga @ 875/1100 - P3482
vga @ 925/1100 - P3646
vga @ 925/1100 and cpu @ 3.9 - P3486 :S what the #$%^ is that about...
none of the tests scored higher than 20 fps... in some way i'm really disappointed in my new graphics card.
CPU i7 960 4.7,
GPU 480 gtx 950/2050
P6852
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/66719
Single card on Icicles :rofl: 1025/1050
7681
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/73864
Dual card 950/1050
12156
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/73633
Need to try those 265 drivers it seems :up:
cheers to finally having a straight 3d bench :oscar:
980x on air passes at 4.81ghz the whole bench :D
so wait let me see if I am reading this right. Sandy Bridge i5 at 4.8GHZ is only 3000pts behind a 4.8GHZ 980X int he physics test despite a 2 physical core and HT difference totally 8 THREADS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chri$ch
thats unreal... Sandy Bridge looks truly AWESOME
finally got sli to work for me thanks to reading here..
cpu hyperthread off.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...I_score_sm.png
Does anyone see a performance difference changing the (Standard settings in AMD/Adjust Image Settings on Nvidia) from it's default (typically called Balance) to Performance?
3x5870 at 1050/1200 with 10.5a cap4
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/110287;jsess...AXmp0CYQ52cLHf
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/1...1110501200.png