I can not make promises regarding the effects of "anti-cheat" applications simply because they are designed for Windows not for XSOS or linux
Printable View
I can not make promises regarding the effects of "anti-cheat" applications simply because they are designed for Windows not for XSOS or linux
well XSOS is windows based aint it? wouldnt that make it ok or did you guys remove things that could cause issues with anti cheat games.Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
technically yes and noQuote:
Originally Posted by Spawne32
so a little bit of option a and a little bit of option b with some maybe on the side?Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
well we are using some Microsoft source code for DX10 but outside of that we have very little microsoft codeQuote:
Originally Posted by Spawne32
How does version 3 compare with version 2?
a complete rebuildQuote:
Originally Posted by dirtwarrior
Bigger, faster, more reliable, no problems, DX10 support, and a Natively broad collection of drivers
Can we get some screenshots from a different web server as well? I can't see them anymore, no matter what I do...
you mean this image isn't completely visible?
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...p2/current.png
wow. what are stale links and what are you planning on doing to them? :o
Not that one, the teaser shots in the first post.
Just looks like KDE + a text editor ^.^
The wait is frustrating :[
Estimated release date?
Seconded, i need to order a dvd drive for the test rig :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by Nosfer@tu
This looks like a screenshot of a system running KDE or at the very least running one of the many varieties of Linux WM's. Heck, even some of the programs are KDE bundled apps and the others (i.e. Amarok) are QT based apps as well. Pardon me for being blunt here, but the more and more I read this thread, the more it smells like something stinky is being told...I know you are a respected member hear and maybe when it's released and I get a chance to analyze it I'll be forced to eat my words, but I just don't have great confidence in what's being told to me. :nono:Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
The thing I still can't understand is how Microsoft supposedly gives you DirectX 10, helps you with your OS by making all this proprietary info available to you(r team), works with you(r team), and then you still take pretty much continuous shots at them in public. What's up with that?Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
Because they have a contract with us, which we are following to the letter.Quote:
Originally Posted by Speederlander
However that doesn't mean we have to like them or agree with their policies.
I am no one's political puppet. However after the completion of the contract, I doubt that Microsoft will renew it.
:p i never did like linux
If nn_step's astonishing claims are true, this ISN'T Linux -_-Quote:
Originally Posted by j4mes
It has nothing to do with being their "puppet", as you put it. It has to do with the level of professionalism and discretion that is expected of the types of organizations inking major contracts with Microsoft. You don't get in the door with Microsoft if you don't demonstrate some minimal level of conduct.Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
Why would Microsoft care even if another OS has Direct X 10 or Direct X 20?
OpenGL was on par with directX a few years back, yet how many abandoned Microsoft?
If you want loyal customers, make them think they need you - Bill Gates
ps: Be patient when it comes to software :)
Because it is proprietary intellectual property that large corporations would spends many millions on to be able to attach to their own operating systems? Because it's probably one of the, if not THE primary marketing point for Vista? Nice 1 post poster popping in on page 15 to offer their thoughts. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by drak3
nn_steps's signature sums it up for me. Sorry but I ll quote it again.
If you want loyal customers, make them think they need you - Bill Gates
:D
Thats what microsoft did always and is successfull.
Vista is for the Noobs of the world and Microsoft knows it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Speederlander
Isn't attempting to recruit the technologically proficient with DX10, but rather get enough people using Vista to convince companies to make applications and drivers for Vista
Yes yes, Microsoft sucks and Vista sucks and is for "noobs", you have made that clear here and in other posts.Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step