anyone here got a full list of all the registry tweaks you already know?
Printable View
anyone here got a full list of all the registry tweaks you already know?
:) I calculated the average.....Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner
these are all old things, as I already said a couple of timesQuote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
/pcilock does nothing significant in my experience, no difference
/noguiboot prevents some bitmaps to load, in other words frees more ram, nothing significant
copy pasted some of reg. tweaks from year ago, some were used by ProTeamJapan, in one of their threas i noticed them, tired all different combination in C2D system, no effect what so ever. And there are some more, but same thing with C2D, uselessQuote:
Runregedit and go to: HKLM/system/currentcontrolset/control/session manager/memory management and set the disableexecutivepaging(This has caused bootproblems for some members, be aware) to =1,
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\Session Manager\Memory Management]
Largesystemcache=1
IOpagelocklimit=16384 in decimal
Code:
;----- 512Mo de RAM
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\Session Manager\Memory Management]
"IoPageLockLimit"=dword:00070000
;128 Mo de RAM : 0001C000
;256 Mo de RAM : 0003C000
;384 Mo de RAM : 0005C000
;512 Mo de RAM : 00070000
;1024 Mo de RAM : 000F0000
Secondleveldatacache=2048 or the same as your L2 cache size in decimal. (this has lowered HouseERaT's x1900xt score, so check it is an improvement after setting it)
In system.ini , add the following line under 386enh: ConservativeSwapfileUsage=1. (N.B. may cause decrease in scores!)
they worked qute well with A64 and Dothans though
I know OPB that you are reading this, you will just have to do beter that that and I am surprised that I wasn't banned on OCX, it is not that hard to figure out my username there
i think everyone here wants to see how he tweaked for his WR run on X6800...not for qx6700
as I was already been proclaimed as a rudest person ever known, that this is what I should be :D
For starters, OBP could give us a new tweak that hasn't been published on XS jet, any tweak that gives a little boost in SPi 1M, don't care if it is 0.001, okey ?
I dont like the "fanboyism" and i dont like to being a fanboy. OPB has all my respect and now im only waiting he show a little bit of his tweaking. So please, dont be rude, XS its a good forum with a lot of knowdlege and nice people, please keep it as this way.
zborgorgon i'm sure you could do better as you do, stop flaming please, all your new posts only make you look a "contra fanboy"
Cheers
as I said, i have already been proclaimed as an :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::b anana:Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
on the contraryQuote:
Originally Posted by ThePredator
And why? (once again)Quote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon
To please you and everybody else who don't spend hours of searching through his OS or even browsing the web to find a tweak that gives you a .1s boost.
Honestly, IF anyone thinks that OPB / Coolaler gains the seconds with just one tweak, you're very, very wrong. In order to run that fast, you have to know multiple tweaks that work together. (Some of you might want to check out 'the other forum', which is, to me, a lot more interesting than XS)
@ Everyone: PLEASE stop bashing the people who put a lot of effort in their tweaking.
http://www.hwbot.org/cewolf/;jsessio...00&iehack=.png
Here you can see that OPB's run (second dot from the right) isn't really that far off the ideal line.
sure and if we made a graph with the "right" scale, we would all look like a straight line... whats your point?Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
EDIT:
sorry that came out a bit harsh... im just frustrated @ how closed minded people can be.
please stop assuming we dont know anything about benching and tweaking.Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
i (along with MANY other people posting here) are well versed in the "art" benching and tweaking, and to dismiss our opinions as being blind "bashers" is being a bit ...."blind"
.
I don't think the scale has anything to do with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Camel
And in which way am I close-minded ??
@massman
with all respect, but we wouldn't be here if it was possible to do what OPB did with only tweaks.
And I really don't understand, a lot of people said his results are not normal and in that case perfectly normal a subject of investigation.
And If you know sth how claiming WR and achievements works world wide in all sorts of diferent categorys.
Lets take a look at acchievements in science. For every Nobel Price achievement. You have to explain the method in detailes and then another group od scientiest need to replicate your results with your procedure and only after that your achievement will be recognized. As simple as that, nothing else.
What does this mean? This has NOTHING to do with the topic so quit posting it.Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonDTM
Meanwhile we have OPBs very nice retort at OCX
If he's really legit why is he sitting on his forum flaming respected members of the OCing community, talking :banana::banana::banana::banana:, and trying to tell us that his tweaks are inexplainable. It's pretty obvious that if he doesn't prove him self legit ASAP he will be labeled a cheater by many, just about everyone that's not from OCX. Will he still "play OC" when no one believes him?Quote:
Originally Posted by OPB
LOL! Man I miss those days...Quote:
Originally Posted by kromosto
@massman, and if we follow the logic of top results from other the best overclockers this world can handle, his result point should be here and that is way way of.
http://img427.imageshack.us/img427/5...95498d7ae4.png
and the point I marked would still be the best tweaked spi run on the world at that very moment
there is some differences on both pics OPB gave in services, but we can't be 100% cause they are not in same order on both pics and not all services are show
difference in
SSDP Discovery Service
QoS RSVP Service
but nothing significant in both of them
i sure hope OPB steps up and explains his tweaks. I agree that his above averge times either need to be explained or invalidated.
Simply not wanting to share is not a good excuse.
Guys like Hipro and pedro and opp and macci etc all have been sharing for years yet they still continue to be on top. (well not so much opp and macci anymore, whereever they are)
No doubt about that, but can you say that you can tweak your system better than OPB, Coolaler or whole team Japan can?Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Camel
Some members (I'm not directly talking to you, Joe) really think that they could pull of a WR, but they can't, because some dude has tweaks that no one knows about. Then there are two options:
1) You start to show statistics about the results, which show that the results is indeed incredible, but what do you want ... it's a WR!
2) Start to find more ways to increase (in this case decrease) your score.
OCing is like sports, if you're first at the finish, you're the winner. Of course you'll have to verify that you have NOT cheated (checksum ...). But in the end, you're the winner. You don't have to tell your fellow competitors how you beat them. Some people DO tell important stuff, for example OPB.Quote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon
Well, since it's come down to this. Why doesn't OPB share his tweaks?
They did not tell the tweaks right away. By the way, OPB has given A LOT of tweaks in the past (look to his 1M WR thread), so you can't say he's not contributing to the oc scene jsut because he's not telling all his tweaks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
What did the OPB told the spi freaks community that hasn't been heard before? :?
that's a horrible analogy. the nobel prize was a good analogy. you're accomplishing something that needs to be validated at high degree of accuracy. the checksum obviously doesn't accomplish this. having people replicate your results does accomplish this.Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
Nothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by tiborrr
Massman you're saying that we need to just assume he found some sort of uber tweak just because he has the fastest picture of spi 1m with a working checksum and refuses to explain?
@massman
like sports, okey, but in sport all your quipement is expected after the run, your blood and run is tested. And result is only legit if done on a public competition and all requiremends are furfiled.
If I run a 100m WR on my back yard I just can't claim it, do I ?
and @massman, every single tweak publish by OPB in his WR run has already been know, for quite some time my I add.
and as you can see, chechsum can be faked quite easily, so it just cannot be the only think that is needed
You have to accept that he knows how to finetune his system and pull a WR of.Quote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
Simple as that, but sometimes you have to have faith in people of not cheating.
To me is the fact that people try to fake their results more disturbing than someone that reaches his top-level and pulled of a WR.Quote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon