300FSB 5/4 was 3D stable on my P4P800SE :)
Haven't tested my new P4C800E Deluxe much though :D
Printable View
300FSB 5/4 was 3D stable on my P4P800SE :)
Haven't tested my new P4C800E Deluxe much though :D
hey how is NB cooled for those 295-300FSB?
besides, removed 2 drives from the system, changed the NB thermal compound to AS3 and no way, 238 boots and 100% stable, 239FSB+ and no POST... though then why I can run 3D at 245x9 when changed in windows???
Yes it could be the CPU, but then why it just craps out past a certain FSB, logically there should be some decline in stability and not just WORK/DON'T WORK. I am confused....
then could it be a bios issue or not? I have heard that earlier when you wanted to hit past 275FSB on P4C you have use 72/36 lock, isn't is?
charlie, which bios do you use?
at the moment I have the opinion that I just have BAD CPU... :(, which does not support more than those 238FSB... :( because that other 725 did not want to boot at anything more than 150FSB and with multi option in bios.... well, not until I get another CPU.... :)
well, will try with an old gf4200 to be completely sure
have you set your jumpers to 533 and flashed your bios at the last rev? tried with 5:4?
Hey guys, can you tell me if the temperature from on-Die Cpu diode can your MoBo read it (if before with P4 did it) after the use of that CT479 adapter & Dothan on it? I am very curious about that!
Do those compatible Asus boards have onboard additional Aux temperature input for additional thermistor probe? (like some much older MoBo)
Than I would ask, if someone is getting Celeron M 350j & trying to 100% OC-it (1,3@2,6G=from 100 to 200Fsb) ... IMHO should work w/o problem & "cheap" too (around 100$ boxed) ... TIA! ... regards ...
If its a 100 FSB chip then you'll have issues getting to 200 ;)
yes, they are set to 533, yes I have flashed to 1000.023 beta where I have multi choice. yes the memory is 5:4 and also tried 3:2, but no way to get to 239FSB and up from BIOS, I can set more from windows, but then it locks quite frequently... upping the voltage up to 1.6V in BIOS has NO effect on it, eventhough it should if it would be a CPU.... then again about RAID, I had RAID with P4 and was able to boot at 250-270, but then again it was another P4C which was RMAed due to faulty dual chanel when at 2-2-2-5. multi it seems has no big effect, just 8x does not work at 200FSB and up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachia
Celeron M "J" (ie: 350J) models are C0 cores (533FSB Pentium M's) but run 100FSB. The 350J can be had for as little as $90.Quote:
Originally Posted by Highland3r
bcn, try to set v-agp at 1.7 or highter....
i also want to go with a p-m!
which one should i buy?
M730 1,6ghz or M760 2,0ghz?
which one is better for OCing?
i ask because the price-difference is ~70 EUR!
http://www.drunken-student.co.uk/pic.../27_pi_cpu.jpg
http://www.drunken-student.co.uk/pic.../27_pi_mem.jpg
Other specs as per sig.
Chips *slowly* responding to burn in, running faster and faster. 257 was instant reboot before, now able to run pi at 260, 265 rebooted pc though :(
bcn, droop mod that p4c800, the vdroop on it is crazy. not only will that stablize your vcore, but it will also overvolt at idle about 0.04v that can make a huge difference. Setting 1.6v and having it droop to say 1.48 right when it goes to boot won't help any. Seeing as how you can up it in windows (while idle, and thus at 1.6v) sounds like a vdroop problem.
If you can clock it higher at idle, and then it frequently crashes and any load... vcore is crapping out.
thanx! that's what is happening to me, at idle sometimes I can set FSB as high as 245-265, but then I put prime and it crashes or just crashes after few minutes, instances.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frozendeath
how can I mod that board? Is it hard? I have never soldered before, but I have that dead p4c dlx to practice on :) how about that Vdimm mod and are there any mods to make it better, to clock it higher?
Well, does nobody know the answer to my first 2 previous questions? :-( ...
& I already have another 2 ones:
- does anybody running Dothan on that Asus adapter, but did NOT flash bios (does it works properly even with old one?
- how about Vcore (with that adapter), is it fixed or is the change still available thru bios & works properly (since the adapter has its own Vcore regulator onboard powered from elsewhere) ?
http://img260.echo.cx/img260/8301/23s7xg.jpg
The motherboard thats been used it an P4C800 Dlx rev 1.03 and a dothan adaptor.
board is fully modded with vdroop mod, vcore mod, kyosen vdimm mod and bios is flashed with the 1021.003 version.
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=490375362
these results are made by me Jort, Alz85 and kristos
there is going to be ln² this vacation :)
vdroop shown here: http://www.malvescorner.net/p4c800.html
It is the easiest mod out of all p4c800 mods. just 28k resistance over that cap as shown by malves.
Good luck.
without flashing a BIOS it won't even POST - you need any 478 P4 or P4 celeron chip to flash it to the latest bios, then change to dothan and adapter.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spajky
Vcore you may select up to 1.6V in BIOS in small 0.025 steps as I recall.
some tests from my new 750 :)
Without tweaks on xp pro sp1, bios 1000 23 beta.
look at fsb-ram :) With gskill tccd.
delta fan on northbridge.
nice!!!!!! is it with default cooling? :slobber:
http://home.arcor.de/jodee3/3190.JPG
Vapochill LS
@bnc
stock hsf+delta
i am having the same temperatures with water cooling.
how does the p4p800 deluxe perform ?? Can you reach high fsb's with that board ?
Asking the same for P4P800SE :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Nazaar
What is your RAM config? You should be under 24 with that speed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by albertwesker
This is quite a long thread and I have looked at a few pages here and there. Seems like a pretty impressive architecture, yet I can't help but stop and think: Intel is not stupid. Intel is a massive company and they are very resourceful. If they thought dothans would rake in the cash, they would have done it.
But what is the longest that anyone has primed their machine for? If anyone has come across anything they would like to share, that would be great. If not, I'll just start another thread and hopefully I would get some responses then :)
Intel knew they had a good chip in the Dothan, as a laptop chip its second to none. Dont think they thought it would come to the desktop though.
Have primed for 21 hours without issue, and numerous 12+ hour sessions. Chips dont get hot at all, even with fan on 50% :)
Read through this thread, its 58 pages but well worth the read. Some really useful info inside :)
Thanks for the reply. The only time I would have for reading 1000 posts on an one CPU (filled with wow this and wow that) is when I am dead :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Highland3r
21 hours... Thats very impressive. Overclocked I assume? :)
Yes, cant remeber what speed this was at, 2.5ghz iirc, will dig out the screengrab for you later on :)
at the moment I have primed my 740 at 238x10 for days and it is completely stableQuote:
Originally Posted by ahmad
Of course you understand me being an AMD fanboy, I am quite astonished at these results. I mean a very low end processor like that is able to match and overcome an overclocked fx-55 CPU which is worth around $1400 (CDN).
My question was directed with intent of trying to find a flaw with these monsters and this was the one I came up with :D . Don't worry, I'll keep thinking really hard and I hope I can find a reason to justify getting an FX-55 for overclocking instead of a dothan... :) (of course there is that whole motherboard support and compatibility, as well as things like SLI and Crossfire which I doubt would be available for Intel mobile chips any time soon).
Assuming money is no object, and you aren't doing video encoding, the FX probably still leads, only because of better mobos. This CT-479 is a smart idea from Asus, but it really is a half-arsed jury-rig. If someone launches a 479-native board with dual channel and all the bells and whistles, like the DFI 875-T, then the Do than would pwn.Quote:
Originally Posted by ahmad
:soap:
With that said, I am now hooking up my cascade to my Dothan to kill all FX's in pi. :lol:
Everybody seems to be using the p4c800-E version...
Does the -E version clock better than the non-E version?
Does anybody know that? :)
-E version has intel RAID and Intel gigabit adapter, non-E version has Broadcom gigabit adapter and no intel RAID, otherwise, they are completely the same!
woohoo :banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by bcn
thanks for the quick answer :)
after few days of intensive BOINC at 238x10, I have finally managed to bot and for now stable at 239x10, which was impossible before with a voltage even at 1.6, now, I have it at 1.475, which translates to 1.44V actual
Do you think it would be possible to start a thread where JUST results are posted? It would be interesting to compile the data for a comparison between the 730s and 750s as well as between the p4p's and p4c's. This 25 page thread is getting a bit cumbersome :o
Hopefully through doing this, we can figure out what "tricks", which motherboard, what voltages, and what RAM these chips like the best :)
lol thats nice.
WR 1:1?
http://mitglied.lycos.de/siedl/P4P%2...3-5_scpuz1.JPG
i am benchable there...
here's my best 1:1 on the Dothan/P4C800E-Dlx.... MUSHKIN TCCDQuote:
Originally Posted by Mrki
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=32845
Is that on stock cooler?
yeah, that's the stock cooler... with a Zalman 7700CU I can go about 2840mHz.... with the stock cooler and 1.53v I run 24/7 at 2700mHz.Quote:
Originally Posted by waddupmm
C
Hmm, I have the same cooler.Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie
But can't get past 2700Mhz (P-M770), sounds quite dissappointing cos I had 2751Mhz with my previous setup (aopen i855 + P-M715).
I hope the droop mod helps to get higher clocks.
Edit:What is your room-temperature? I think the 30+*C is killing the OC :slap:
yeah, my ambient is about 24c...
C
are there any Vmods for the P4P800 SE ??
Malves CornerQuote:
Originally Posted by Nazaar
@ Charlie, did you have to do any mods to reach 295Mhz?
Cause that's a mighty fine mem speed you got there :D
thanks man, and they dont even look that hard :woot:Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie
xtreme!!! :toast:
i must isolate my sockel better. than countinue testing.
/edit
one question
why his sandra score so much better?
http://www.abi00.de/silversurfr2/pic...%201,8vagp.png
the p-m ocing looks great :woot:
Amazing Charlie!
But wasn't TCCD+875 supposed to be a crappy combo? :confused:
well if you notice, he has memory at 295MHz and yours is only 245 :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrki
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcn
its not mine and its an other problem.
he have wirh 1:1 and 295MHz only 6600mb/s. and the other guy have with 245mhz(real) 6300mb/s
u know what i mean?
by the way my new result
http://mitglied.lycos.de/siedl/P4P%2...2-2-2-5_pi.JPG
HOLY SH*T :clap:
actually I do NOT... one has 1:1, the other 5:4, then again it depends on timings... i do not see anything strange in that difference.... :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrki
By the way, how the hell did you up the voltage that much??!! what cooling are you using?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrki
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcn
hehe ok
perhaps i look wrong.
vcore and vdrop mod. using vapo ls. eva temp -50 cpu -25.
now i test 32m with 1.8vcore hehe :D
well, at the moment you are here with highest FSB on P4C dlx :) incredible, man!
well obviously 295, 1:1 beats 245mHz with tight timings... but 260 tight should beat tccd in all cases...
C
Have bought nothing yet, trying to put together a nice system that has a little bit of futureproofing... figure if any nice HDTV cards come along, they are likely PCIx? which leaves me with the P4GD1... not available in US. so... if booting a 350j at 200MHZ FSB is not likely, certainly don't want to go that route, and would go PM730 instead (but would probably get a different MB with it). anyone played around with a CM 350J (C0 stepping, 100 FSB) yet? old tests i read showed little difference between 512k L2 CMs and 1MB Banias... hoping the same is true of the dothan core CMs if they can boot at 200FSB... looks like a great solution for an $85 cpu if it is doable.
The only mod is the NB cooler... I've found that all my tccd, mushkin, g.skill... all run well on it :D Oh I run 1.70Vagp.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack
C
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigNewb
The 100 fsb CM's have overall had trouble getting to 200fsb. Much like the older 100fsb dothans, they hit a magic wall at 180+ fsb. Now from what I understand, the dothans have multipier adjustment via the right bios (due to intel "speedstep") however the Celeron M's do not support this feature. The point being that since the CM is stuck at the default multiplier it makes it hard to boot at 200fsb, especially with stock cooling. Now for $85 it is a fine CPU, but it simply wont put up numbers like a Dothan will. The 730 is a monster for its price, with the possiblity of 2.7+ ghz on stock air. Adjust the multi down, and with some nice ram you can really pull that pi time low and other benches / games high :)
If all depends on how future proof you want to go. SLI and DDR2 are not options for a Dothan rig at this time. Look for some dual core dothan goodness in yohan coming from intel in '06, which you may want to hold out for (I know its a while away).
BUT if you want the possibility to match and fx-55 clock to clock performance wise, and in some cases surpass that. Than a 730 - 760 Dothan is the way to go. Future proof enough that it can take top spots on the ORB. Dothan itself just needs some great hardware to go with it. Get some nice ram like gskill TCCD or some UTT (like muskin redline) a solid platfrom such as the p4c800e-dlx, and a high end agp video card.....
Future proof enough for a while ;)
All comes down to: how much money you want to put in, what you consider future proof, and how badly you want the latest and greatest (SLI/Crossfire, ddr2, etc)
Hope that helps
even the C0 stepping CMs? I've searched quite a bit, and can't find anyone that has attempted OCing the 350j (C0 stepping with 13 multiplier, thus 2.6 at 200 boot... if they are rated based on market rather than perf, why not?) with the CT-479. Aren't the CMs simply PMs with half the cache and the speedstep deactivated during validation??? does the performance of chips from a given fab vary that much? as my name says... newb. in fact, not even sure i'm spelling newb right. noob? :slap:Quote:
Originally Posted by Frozendeath
I can't comment on the C0 stepping, but all of the CM's I have seen (not sure what stepping each was) would not reach 200 fsb. Other members here with hands on experience may be able to answer that better.
Best info I could find: Here
And I think your right, CM's basically lack the cache and speedstep compared to their dothan brothers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frozendeath
yeah... how does the cpu define the default fsb speed anyway... if the CM dothan goes as the CM banias, they should be from the same production shouldn't they?
then again, maybe they aren't???
here is a comparison of the banias core CM and PM...
http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/2...ntrino-01.html
banias they had the same FSB speed (100MHz)... here they don't? maybe they are not simply C0 dothan's with half the cache disabled now, but a new beast entirely?
Any one going to produce an overclockers board for the Dothan CPU? If so when? Thread? etc!!!!!!
http://img261.echo.cx/img261/5053/stable1uw.th.jpg
Nice and stable this will be my everyday setup.
Dothan 730 (1.6 Ghz) @ 2.6 Ghz, 1.55v
Corsair TWINX1024-3200C2 (2, CMX512-3200C2) 2.85v, 2-2-2-5
Asus P4P800 SE, No mods, boot @ 201, clockgen to 220
Looks nice :) What cooling?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ychocky
i like the 'Utility notification' comment :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Ychocky
I was able to get 265Mhz 1:1 but if I use the 5:4 divider the mobo craps out as soon as I pass 270Mhz. How did you guys reach 290+Mhz FSB?
Still on stock, I'm wondering if an Zalman 7000 Cu is even needed. (I'm a huge Zalman "fanboy" Ha! FANboy!!! get it? :D ) I'd like to perhaps get one mounted once the warmer ambient temperature comes (Winter) It's very cool in this basement...Quote:
Originally Posted by DaWaN
I just got home from work and it has been priming for a good 10 hours. At 36 degrees celsius...
I love this cpu id utility.... It get's funnier every time I see it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack
I am very pleased with this rig. Didn't spend to much (Just under $1000 CDN) and it outperforms my A64 3400+ (s754 mind you) (Atleast $2000)
Question: Would buying a 6600 GT or 6800 GT (The latter assuming they plummet in price with the new seven series debuting.) be worthwhile? My next computer will be PCI-E but for now AGP is king. My GeForce 4 Ti 4600 is too precious to replace though. I love that card 4x AGP and all.
@ bigNewb : CM350J is a Dothan core! step.C0 IMHO should hit 200Fsb (stock adapter cooler): it has almost 15% less heat dissipation than PM at the "same" Cpu clock, 0,1Vcore less (default) than PM & "only" half L2, which are "features" that from few past years history proofed like to be a key to better OC, if your are not really unlucky to get a bad Cpu example ... [Addendum: P_M & C_M on Dothan core have almost same heat dissipation (C-M maybe max a W less) on same frequency/Fsb & Vcore & accordingly approx.25% less than the same frequency Banias core!] ...
Yes, probably won´t start @ 200Fsb @ default Vcore (since is lower than PM one), BUT :
there is always available to set the Vcore higher & if the setup doesn´t apply it right @ boot, there is always a possibility of tricking it to think, that Cpu has a higher default Vcore via "socket VID pins hole wire trick mod" or instead of using very very thin wire to do that, using a silver conductive pait to interconnect proper VID pins to set Vcore higher @ boot. With adding more Vcore than from Bios & better cooling, IMHO you could OC more than 200Fsb later to reach frequencies higher than 2,6GHz ... :)
That 180MHz Fsb barrier someone mentioned before, IMHO was the problem of a native PM chipset on desktop PM "native" boards, which IMHO looks alike is really not a problem with Asus base ... :-) [my wrong statement!]
IMHO for such as cheap Cpu like CM350J (90$) & half the price as PM730, it is worth a try & at your place, I´d go for that, but its your own choice naturally! Later if no joy, you can still sell the chip & buy PM7x0 instead ... just my 2c ... :)
Regards, http://www.spajky.vze.com :)
no! the fsb limitation for dothan 400 is not due to the mobo chipset (i855): i have 2 dothan 725 which cannot overcome 160fsb whatever cpu ratio used ( and this on i875p chipset)! On the contrary my new pm 730 reach easily 200fsb (200x12) with a little bump on the vcore (1.3625) and at the very moment runs at 209x12 (vcore=1.4125) on my p4p800se :banana:
10x290 / 1:1 / 2.5-3-3-5
perhaps going more ...
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=25323
http://mitglied.lycos.de/siedl/P4P%2...3-3-5_cpuz.JPG
which begs the question, what limits the 400 MHz chips to ~180 FSB? is it the default FSB (still don't know how this gets set on the chip side), or is it the stepping? if it is the former, the newer CMs will still have problems... if the latter, should be fine (maybe even better?). still have not seen ANYONE that has tried the necessary mods to attempt a boot at 200 FSB... everyone seems to be booting lower and trying to step it up. If the issue is PCI/AGP lock, and that is no longer an issue at 200FSB, then the only question is... will the 350J boot at 200fsb (not will it get there, starting at 133 or whatever and inching up) with the appropriate jumpers, mods, etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by pvhk
@ pvhk
: IMHO you should do the math once again! No wonder you could not go higher with practically default Vcore with both your PM725 ones (1,6G). With 160Fsb you achieved (2,56G) is a quite normal result with default cooling, since mostly w/o bumpin´ up Vcore Dothans go around 2,5GHz so ... Your 725 Dothans/100Fsb (27W) going to 200Fsb (3,2G!-100% OC) would need max.Vcore & at least waterCooling & maybe a Peltier element too! You other one (730/133fsb-but same basic 1,6GHz frequency) is just 50% OC-ed to 200Fsb/2,4G.
The story with low (13x) multiplier & 100Fsb CM350J having a default 1,26Vcore (and max.full load 21W heat dissipation is IMHO totally different & IMO could with 10% up bumped Vcore /to 1,38V/ hit w/o problem 200Fsb/2,6GHz with stock cooler ... and would be faster than your 725/160GFsb@2,56G because of higher Fsb ... Compare Mrki´s result!
@ Mrki : wow, good achievement! :) What kind of cooling & Vcore?
Regards from Spajky, the member of "Silent AirCooled Computer Owners Team" (with inaudible setup, Tualatin on BX) :) ...
well, I am sure he has changed a multi, cause I could not get higher than 150FSB, with 725, whatever multi set on it and whatever voltage!..
In Aquamark my little Dotthy at 2.85G and with stock HSF, scores higher than a 3.6G FX57 with subzero cooling. :hehe: :moon:
http://img172.echo.cx/img172/3635/dothan0at.jpg
So why not scores with Dothan + 7800? :confused: :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by NoX
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoX
nise chip you have there! where is it from and what date?
Spaskjy:no need to do math I said that my 2 725 fsb limit is 160 whatever ratio used and rising vcore did not change anything and both max at 2.4Ghz (15x160 ok, don't work at 16x160)) :D
Eventually they will come. If you search the ARC there are already some impressive scores with Dothans at 3+ Ghz. Kingpin with an X850XT is just 7000 points away from the WR (FX57 + 7800s)Quote:
Originally Posted by uclajd
I got this 730 chip from ewiz.com a couple of months ago. I don't have the box with me to check, but if I remember correct it was dated 11/04.Quote:
Originally Posted by bcn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spajky
vapo ls ...
thats max :)
10x300 1:1 2.5-3-3-5 OCZ TCCD cooled by vapo ls
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=25326
http://mitglied.lycos.de/siedl/P4P%2...3-3-5_cpuz.JPG
wow! Is that a P4C800? What vmod are u using? NB cooling?
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoX
jep. P4C800-E Deluxe :toast:
NB cooling stock. only a good 120 fan
have vcore, vdrop and vdimm mod
greetz mrki
Nice!
Got my very own Dothan rig up and running today (well, actually yesterday since it's over midnight here right now..). :) P4C800-E Deluxe + CT-479 & Pentium M 730 (SL86G, Malay, 04/14/2005)
My PM 730 does 2600MHz with stock cooling and about the max Vcore the 1023 BIOS lets me to use. Best 1M is done a bit under that though because my TCCD's don't like much over 210MHz at 2-2-2-5.
Will switch to better (air) cooling during the weekend and try to get out some marks too (with a Leadtek 6600GT). Thanks to all who have contributed to this thread. Has helped a lot in discovering the power of Dothan and getting going with it. :toast:
Maybe using an old PCI video card would do looser time in superpi?Max i can achieve is 27,78secs @2,7ghz aprox and 2-2-2-4(13x multi and 1:1 mem) in a P4GD1... :stick:
Hmm, could it be so? Have got one old ATI PCI card in the closet. Maybe should try it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by ^don.k's^
Got my 27.937s @ 2.567GHz. Must be the advantage P4C800-E gives over P4GD1.
Goes maybe a little offtopic but how have you attached your coolers to dothan + CT-479 systems?... I looked through the cooling sections but there was nothing there. Id need to attach a water block on it.
"CT-479 mounting tricks?"Quote:
Originally Posted by Sume4
Siinä on jotain aiheesta. :)
just an idea - how 'bout submitting all results to oc database?
overclockers http://www.cpudatabase.com/ seems to be quite an ok solution (or will xs include similar thing here too?)
what boards other than the p4p800 se and p4c800-e deluxe are worth getting? also, how much do they cost new and where can you get them? i see the p4p800 se and p4c800-e deluxe everywhere but i can't find the other p4c series boards ANYWHERE...not even used. so far i seem to find
p4p800 se - around 95 new
p4c800-e deluxe - around 180 new
is the p4c worth the doubled price, or is it worth buying a p4p or tracking down a p4c800 non-dlx version? links and suggestions would be great, i'm looking for a decent overclock but i'm not gonna pay 180 for an old motherboard unless the performance of the other choices is terrible.
My max 1M
http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/3...26023zd.th.jpg
Can't figure out why I seem not to be able to boot for example at 10x240 or 9x240 (1:1 or 5:4) no matter what timings and voltage (seems so). Booting with 10x201 or 9x201 works fine though and with ClockGen I can use 10x250 1:1 (2-3-3-5) or 5:4 (2-2-2-5) easily. Maybe some new non-beta BIOS will bring the solution. I'm using 2x512MB TCCD.
do you burn-in these p-m's, and if; did you gain speed or/and a lower vcore? :)
M740 Watercooled
2Gb Ballistix kit
P4C800-ed (BIOS 1023 beta1)
X800pro modded XT PE
This is on XP sp1 with no tweaks
http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/9...0spi8zk.th.jpg
1.45v set in BIOS, droops to 1.39/1.4v under load , might do a droop mod.
and 33K 2001 default card - no tweaks again
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8636017
Heading on up :)
Hows 36k at barely over 2.6GHz sound? :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
Nice clocks on the GFX. :toast:Quote:
HIS Excalibur X800XT PE @ 635/630 vGPU= 1.63v, Alpha PAL6035 provided by OC-Rookie + delta60mm. AGP @ 79MHz. 100% air.
But I guess your tweaked right out there & running Win2000 with dx8.1
Is that the fastest config even with an Intel/ATI based setup ???
Yep, much to my surprise it is. The gain isn't the same as it is with AMD, but Win2K is the OS to use, definitely with Dothans, seemingly even with P4's.
Dang, those 2 gigs are flying. :slobber: