i dont think so ;)
gotta love those fortron psus :D
Printable View
i dont think so ;)
gotta love those fortron psus :D
with the higher rails i can now do 9x240 2-2-3-9 PRIMESTABLE!
1.7v vdd default nb with delta@5v sb with zalman and 40mm fan@5v twinmos3700+khx 3500@3.2v
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postid=216348
not bad for the crappy 9 multi! i need a better cpu to get some 10x and 11x action :D
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postid=216352
I think it will do prime stable with a little less voltage as well.
The important part is that you voltages don't drop too much, otherwise prime will surely fail.
If i give more than 1.93Vcore my 12V will drop to 11.5V or even lower.
Needless to say Prime fails.
Running such high voltages will definatly short the liftime of your hardware but if you're happy with it, then so am i. ;)
Here's mine:
http://members.speedguide.net/lt73/too_point_five_.jpg
Still werkin on it. I keep hittin a wall @ 230 :mad:
does 11 give you higher scores than 9?
Yeah, by about 5 points.Quote:
Originally posted by saaya
does 11 give you higher scores than 9?
Did you try all 3 with the same CPU?Quote:
Originally posted by pc ice
i bought 3 new nf7's this week and they all have a problem going over 235....it's bothering me...i have gone threw about 7 or more nf7's seem's the earlyer one went higher...i mean i have all the ram i need to test with ram doe's over 250 easy even at 2.5.2.2 timing's but not these three board's there just not having it..what you guy's think.
It might be the CPU limiting the FSB.
Do the NB have the same stepping on all 3?
Could also be bios related....
Yeah. I know that issue... :rolleyes: :DQuote:
Originally posted by pc ice
but these last three seem to suck or have a block at 230/235.
Mine seems to have a block at 250 dc ;)
Some of the newer boards seem to have probs getting high fsbs and others do that stock :p:
Mickeymouse alias Jason has also noticed this some time ago :(
Here's my new mem bench :
http://members.speedguide.net/lt73/bench1.jpg
Barton XP2500 @ 11.5x227=2505Mhz 1.8vcore, 2.9vdimm
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...threadid=18998
H20 cooled ;)
same here with my 3 nf7-s 2.0 boards... i think nvidia is using silicon of a worse quality for the last nf2 chipsets to save mobney. same with amd.Quote:
i bought 3 new nf7's this week and they all have a problem going over 235....it's bothering me...i have gone threw about 7 or more nf7's seem's the earlyer one went higher...i mean i have all the ram i need to test with ram doe's over 250 easy even at 2.5.2.2 timing's but not these three board's there just not having it..what you guy's think.
Little improvement on the bandwidth side of things...
Just found out that 11-2-2-2.0 performs better than 11-3-2-2.0.
My Twinmos PC 3700 forced me to run 11-3-2-2.0 but my trusty old Twinmos/Winbond BH-5 does 11-2-2-2.0 no problem.
Spot the difference:
Hey Zeus, looks like I see about a 30ish point increase with tighter timings. Most impressive!
I finally got 230 from my twinmos PC3200 BH-5 , still at 2.8vdimm @ 11-2-2-2
http://members.speedguide.net/lt73/bench2.jpg
here mine's
all the test were with 10x because actually i got lower mem-result with 10,5x (if the damn would like to boot at 250 Mhz :()
243Mhz 2-3-2-11 : 3748
245Mhz 2-3-2-11 : 3770
245Mhz 2-2-2-11 : 3786
I wished i could have 245Mhz*10,5 stable , but no way even if the barton would run at 2.63Ghz stable :D
That's some awesome results man!! :toast:Quote:
Originally posted by xigfrid
here mine's
all the test were with 10x because actually i got lower mem-result with 10,5x (if the damn would like to boot at 250 Mhz :()
243Mhz 2-3-2-11 : 3748
245Mhz 2-3-2-11 : 3770
245Mhz 2-2-2-11 : 3786
I wished i could have 245Mhz*10,5 stable , but no way even if the barton would run at 2.63Ghz stable :D
No way that you even get 245MHz dual 2,0-11-2-2 stable cause it's the nb limiting you! :(
I ran memtest for windows over an hour at 250 MHz single channel at 3,20V and only had 1 error... at dual errors appear every second (almost ;) )!!!
I feel I could run up to 255MHz... :rolleyes:
memtest is not everything ...
I ran memtest86 240Mhz DC 2-2-2-11 all the night on test#5, had no error after about 4XX passes :D
but when i got CPU priming, fluctuations kill the stability, even if i try to overvolt the cpu :rolleyes:
btw, I think i 'll wait my new NF7, because i can't get it stable at 240Mhz, i m quiet happy with theses benchmarks thinking that the mobo wouldn't do 200Mhz DC at stock stable :p:
Quote:
Originally posted by xigfrid
memtest is not everything ...
I ran memtest86 240Mhz DC 2-2-2-11 all the night on test#5, had no error after about 4XX passes :D
but when i got CPU priming, fluctuations kill the stability, even if i try to overvolt the cpu :rolleyes:
Yeah. I know. Same results with memtest 3.0 in dos :rolleyes:
But memtest for windows plays in another liga ;)
There's more stress from other components in windows too...
Didn 't believe it myself. Vdd is also important.
I've figured it out the same problem, memtest at 220 11-2-2-2 produced O error in memtest for 4 pass, with OCZ 3500EL and 2.8vdimm, but once in windows, spalsh, exe error, crc error and finally blue screen. Though, I was able to test under sandra, and reached 3360mb/s. I don't know what's wrong, but it's only stable at 200mhz now, everything over that point seems to crash.I've tryed ONCE to boot at 8*230mhz, but black screen, mobo not responding. I guess I have a bad NF7.
Give the mem all volts you can ;)Quote:
Originally posted by kanedazan
I've figured it out the same problem, memtest at 220 11-2-2-2 produced O error in memtest for 4 pass, with OCZ 3500EL and 2.8vdimm, but once in windows, spalsh, exe error, crc error and finally blue screen. Though, I was able to test under sandra, and reached 3360mb/s. I don't know what's wrong, but it's only stable at 200mhz now, everything over that point seems to crash.I've tryed ONCE to boot at 8*230mhz, but black screen, mobo not responding. I guess I have a bad NF7.
But I experienced some bad nf7 too... :(
11 indeed gives better scores than 9
9x240 2-2-3-9 =3501
9x240 2-2-3-11=3518
damn i need a better cpu to get some 10x action going :(
Is 3340/3124 good for 220 SC?
2-2-2-11 Epox 8RDA+ 3309 bios.. need other stick of ram 8-)
I got a pair of TwinMOS Twister PC3700 256MB.
In sandra at 223MHz 2.0-2-3-6 @ 2.6V; DC; CPU interface enabled. Results are:
3425/3222
I'am having some NB problems, I'll try some Vdd mod, because if I drop Vdd from 1.7 to 1.6 I can only do 219MHz. But if I loosen my timings or up my mem voltage there is no way to get over 223MHz. It is Prime95 stable at this speed and voltage. At 225 MHz Prime95 crashes after 2 seconds no matter what Vmem I set. Obiously an NB problem.
my score
is this any good?:confused:
koensa, thats bad... 11.5 multi sux... try 11