Find it hard to believe that Austin Computers has the inside word.
Plus that price is outlandish.
-PB
Printable View
Find it hard to believe that Austin Computers has the inside word.
Plus that price is outlandish.
-PB
1920x1200 ? NoAA ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Handrox
You know that lower resolution with just 2xAA or none at all, isn't helping the GTX 690 and SLI "open up", right ?
http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph5805/46182.png
http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph5805/46181.png
1920x1200 and SLI/CF with high end cards is like comparing a Miata and a LFA-1 with a 1/12th mile drag :D
but there is butQuote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/l...forces/nv1.jpg
Not quite sure what I'm meant to be looking at here...Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxforces
A picture of someone (possibly) connected to an (nVidia) FTP?
-PB
only some people have access to that server like SKYMTL-temporarily every time he gets a new password and user nameQuote:
Originally Posted by paulbagz
to make it clear I don't work for NV or press but there is but
It's automatic data pulled from dropshipping distributors.... not their "inside word". So, I'd say it's a fairly certain shot at this point at the clocks etc. listed. 512-bit sounds like it could be an error, or a surprise though :eek: .Quote:
Originally Posted by paulbagz
Thanks for clarifying that Max :) :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxforces
-PB
Access to an ftp doesn't really mean much though....Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxforces
Certain NVIDIA and AMD FTPs are always open, particularly the one for NVOnline. And they don't contain NDA'd info.
really??
SKYMTL- each big event you have new password and user name.
512bit and 6gb makes no sense
512 bits is just the memory bus size... I think they can put any amount of memory on there and it would work.
of course you can make 512bit work with 6gb but it is not efficient.
What would be the perf difference? 1%?
think like this to populate 384bit bus with 32 bit chips you need 12 chips and for 512bit you need 16 chips. you can achieve 6gb with 12 512mb chips in 384 bit but you need 8 512mb 8 256mb chips to achieve 6gb on 512bit. using different size chips is not prefered as it increases unneccesary complexity while you can solve tihs simply by using same size chips.
Two weeks left ..... hurry up .....
:D
BenchZowner - These reviews are increasingly difficult to take seriously, I made this comment about the percentage difference with this in mind, criticize, know that they are false.
Each ram chip is 32bits, old sdram and maybe ddr1 was 16bits per chip if I remember.
32bit x 16 = 512bit
6144meg's / 16 = 384 megs per chip.
This isn't likely, and it doesn't match the specs of the quadro.
32bit x 12 = 384bit
6144megs / 12 = 512 megs per chip.
This seems more likely, and it matches the quadro.
Each crossbar is 64bit as far as I know, on the gpu.
The gpu would likely need a min of 2 chips to run.
And any multible of that would work as long as it has the crossbar's for it.
In this case it's 6, 6x 64bit = 384bit.
Yes it's not an even number in the sense that it's not 4 or 8 or 16.
But it's fine, instead of say 200%, it's more like 150% perf increase in ram.
There is no perf penalty as far as I'm guessing, I'm sure it uses 64bit per read, it's just it can pipeline it more into a chain of 384bits.
Just a guess, for the heck of it.
8x sgssaa at a 50% fps increase in theory... hmm
I don't know any numbers right off hand...
But I do know that 4xsgssaa is a tad bit sluggish on the 680 in some games, other games 8x is fine.
That and the card still struggles with games like mafia 2.
The 780 might be the thing I'm looking for, but it's more likely that it's not, I'm betting the next gen after that is the one to get.
But I'm gonna get it anyways probably.
I really like sgssaa with a -15 bais, I wish there was a 16x ss grid transparency aa to go along with 16x aa, I think that would be the sweet spot in terms of quality (8xsgssaa still lowers the texture quality a bit).
Edit:
I should be checking perf reviews of the 690 in certain games to figure out what the performance could look like at best, excluding the ram amount thing though.
Lets stay simply rational... The GK110 you can find on Tesla card have a 384bits bus.. why will you Nvidia release a card based on this sku and rework the MC for get a 512bits bus instead of use the same memory controller ?
Then titan will be 2xGTX670,they can market 2x256 bit as 512 bit :)
GTX Titan OpenCL Environment Vs 7970GHz :
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/2a8...a23d3f40f4.jpg
Reporting 2688SP/875MHz/6GB
http://clbenchmark.com/compare.jsp?c...fig_1=14470292
Found on 3DCenter, thanks to Godmode :up:
hi guys
Exclusive NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX Titan Final Specification
http://www.arabpcworld.com/images/20...ation-APCW.jpg
http://www.arabpcworld.com/?p=26335Quote:
Reached our hands today the final specifications for the card NVIDIA GEFORCE Titian It really card violent specifications, will come card based on nucleus GK110 manufactured precision manufacturing 28nm where Contains block your pal GPU on a number 14 units SMX number 2688 CUDA Core and the number 224 and Unit clothing and 48 ROPs.
Card comes with huge memory capacity up to 6GB DDR5 384 bit bus width card will come a frequency of 6000 MHz.
The card will come at 240 Watt power consumption and This Tstay there bombers Energy 6 8 Ben Any maximum Asthlat rate can absorb energy PCB card is 300 watts.
The actual launch date of the card is on 18 February.
Hide us frequencies to put in another time, but all we can say it's powerful.
Wait surprises soon.
Aw, not another cut-down top end chip... :shakes:
Thats what i was thinking nv pulled what intel did with the D cpu back in the day.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex-Ro
Hell the 670 chip aint that big slap two of them together under the heatspeader and there you have it
i hope it will not be a big disappointment after this much huge expectations.
if all this Specifications correct AMD will feel like this:D
http://s7.postimage.org/bl2sae3xj/avatar126343_1.gif