Ewiz has it @ $90 NRB
http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?name=AT-4770_51
Printable View
Ewiz has it @ $90 NRB
http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?name=AT-4770_51
Wow, so HD4770 CF price is 180USD now, nearing 4870 1GB levels while being 20-30% faster in general.
Is ATI still planning on a 4750? I have not heard a word about it at all. If they do I'm wondering if they'll use DDR3 or low clocked GDDR5.
GDDR3 and yes they are still planning it.Quote:
Originally Posted by xBanzai89
Might be another month though until they have enough volume to release them.
where are the non reference design already? havent jumped on this one because of the crappy cooler
Another HD4770 CrossFire Review
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/966/1/Quote:
The ATI Radeon 4770 video card can be found today for $94.99 after rebate, which makes it a great value. If you bought a pair of these cards and ran them in CrossFire you'd be out ~$190, which isn't a bad price considering what you get and how well they overclock. Will a pair of Radeon HD 4770 video cards in CrossFire be enough to beat the Radeon HD 4890 OC and GeForce GTX 275? Read on to find out!
an ok review, and i think it shows how 8xaa seems to hurt these cards. and im not too happy with alot of the games were done at such a low framerate that most would be considered unplayable.
You can get that nice double slot cooler from XFX for 99.99 dollars plus shipping @ mwave. http://www.mwave.com/mwave/viewspec_...iteria=3005196
arggggg this sux i pulled the trigger last nite on the crappy cooler version and it shipped already :(Quote:
Originally Posted by xBanzai89
on another note is mwave reputable seller? i might just pick this one up and sell the other one...thx
Yup, it's soon arriving in Sweden as well. Hard to tell if it has heat pipes though. And by looking at the pictures it seems like it's the lite PWM version, same caps missing as in the "skimpy" ones.Quote:
Originally Posted by xBanzai89
I got the PowerColor 4770 card. I really was amazed by the low noise and high output of this low cost card (90e).
But i was really disappointed by the idle power consumption. Without the VGA my IDLEs go to 64-66 W. with the card go to 115W!
This is a 50W difference. I wasn't expecting the idle to be so high after reading xbit labs review. of course other reviews have these values as mine.
I hope this can go lower via drivers (upto now ATI hasn't released any driver for this card, only the manufacturers did).
Just for history, high power values (Furmark running) are (110W without VGA, 200W with VGA).
If you don't mind, try underclocking and undervolting the memory portion.
HI
2 questions:
1-asus bios works in all others cards doing software voltmod possible to all brands??
2-can you help me with this distances in the picture..
http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/9...ntfull4770.jpg
thxs :D
Looks like Tri-CF is working on HD4770!
Thanks to our fellow member Hazzan who did some runs with 3 ASUS HD4770 TOP!
Look in Xtreme 3D Section.
Anyone with 4 cards at hand?? :up:
Really? Where are the heatpipes? They're visible on the review cards, but not on this one, so it simply can't be the same cooler.Quote:
Originally Posted by onethreehill
Not trying to shoot the messenger. onetreehill, you do a great job feeding us with news and links here!:up:
http://www.cpusers.gr/attachment.php...1&d=1241094297
:shrug::shrug::shrug::shrug::shrug::shrug::shrug:
http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/...4770.front.png
Two HD 4770 is CF what I like. If I upgrade from HD 3870 a single HD 4770 is still faster. Reason why I don't mind CF support in most games. Also has stuff I like about CF HD4770 is doesn't take as much power, and it's faster.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shintai
If some games don't support it's probably old and it's already faster on older hardware.
My test data:
Test Setup:
AMD 955 @ 3.2GHz
MSI 790GX-G65
4GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz
Vista Premium 64-Bit
Catalyst 9.4
Forceware 185.66
3DMark06 - 1280x1024, 8xAA, 16xAF, Force Full Precision
Reference ATi card used.
4890 1G - 11967
4850 1G - 8739
4770 512M OC (800/850) - 8671
GTS250 512M - 8426
4770 512M - 8191
4830 512M - 7870
9800GT 512M - 6895
Suspect Crossfire will rival 4890 except when frame buffer limitation comes into play especially when overclocked.
Had to manually select 4750 driver for the card to get it to run, hopefully Catalyst 9.5 will fix that.
The card is pretty much silent even when running furmark.
We're currently listing them at the same price as 9600GT 1GB so a definite win at that price point.
Another HD4770 CrossFire Review
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...=273&Itemid=72
any water blocks planned for this yet? or, any current blocks fit this?
If you look closer you can see that the fan and shroud are bigger, so the pipes might be hidden under there. The fan is bigger for sure, and that is a plus. Too bad the PCB is lacking PWM parts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mats
From what I've seen there are quite a few handpicked cards out there, let's hope XFX has opted for some cherry picked cards to convince consumers they are in the ATI corner for serious business.:D
You're right, but it's still not the same cooler. It could be better or worse, or pretty much the same. I hope we'll see a review soon. Inet have them in Sweden, wanna buy one Clint?:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Clint
why spend 50-120$ on a water block, for a 90$ card?Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteFireDragon
why spend $500+ on watercooling in the first place when a $70 true does it pretty much as well? oh right, because we want toQuote:
Originally Posted by Manicdan
its for the exotics of WC or no fan noise. this is the same thing as wanting to WC a mobo with 4 different blocks (2 mosfets, NB, SB), which hardly makes a difference in performance. it's the fact that we're just able to do it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Manicdan
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNiiPE_DoGG
the question was about the cost/benefit of spending a huge amount of money on cooling an inexpensive card. in all i think my WC setup has saved me money when i compare how much its worth in total, and how many different setups i can use it for. the only thing ive upgraded were the water blocks ever few generations. been using the same pump and radiators for 6 years now i think.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteFireDragon
but the point was, why spend 125$ per 4770 + 50-125$ per waterblock(350-500$ total), when you could instead get a 4890 with 1 waterblock (at 250$ + 50-150$ for the block = 300-400$ total), depending on if you go with FC or just GPU cooling. in the end it looks like 50-100$ more.
i think the market to water cool the 4770 is too small to make a FC, and i dont know if the mounting holes match any other cards, so i dont know if you can just drop in any current GPU coolers (i completely forget what the term is for a waterblock that covers just the GPU, lol) the only counter arguement i have for myself is if they make a 4770x2, and its really popular, then i could see a decent enough market for a FC block for that card.