3DMARK 2K1 low clock challenge II

First tests with GTX285,pretty nice card.Also some more with my GTX295 (needs watercooling for even better results)



GTX285

Verification link
http://service.futuremark.com/result...3&resultType=6

Image
http://www.hwbox.gr/images/imagehost...4efb780b5f.jpg

GTX295

Verification link
http://service.futuremark.com/result...6&resultType=6

Image
http://www.hwbox.gr/images/imagehost...4efb7a9f84.jpg

nice moonman
what clocks on GPU?

either me and G H Z are not tweaking right or these 4870s are faster than 4890s :D

i've only had two quick test sessions....probably the earlier assumption :D

Thx dinos, 815MHz gpu, 925 MHz mem. ATM nature fps = gpu mhz + 65~70 :)

bloody nice man
so just as i thought we only need core MHz for nature pretty much due to 4.2GHz limitation on CPU

no need to strain these gfx cards then heheheheh for all tests

if you have a 4890 i'd love to see if you can get those same FPS cause after some thinking i'm a bit dumbfounded how i'd be able to achieve similar combination of FPS ..... :cool:

looks like George might have some backups too judging by some FPS :D

time to finish off painting the house and do some more testing i think :ROTF::D

same here Dino, these 4890's are so strong but it feels like fake power. i think its maybe the drivers making them bad?

Yeah, save some LN2, electricity, push gpu only for nature. :rofl:

4870 is my only card, sorry.

According to my tests there's about 100 points more in system tests, of course with a perfect run :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vivi2

same here Dino, these 4890's are so strong but it feels like fake power. i think its maybe the drivers making them bad?

---

yeah thats the feelin i was getting

but look i can understand that

ATI CBFd tweaking drivers for 4890 to run fast on 3DMARK2001 any more i'm sure :rofl::D

Last one for today with gtx285.....


Verification link

http://service.futuremark.com/result...2&resultType=6

Image

http://www.hwbox.gr/images/imagehost...53cfbecec4.jpg

(thanks to JC_Denton for the super-duper watermark :hehe:)

Ωραίος ωρέ ο κριουλιάρης ! :up: :ROTF:

Νice one Chris ! :up: There is more on that GTX285 though, keep 2k1ing it ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by George_o/c

Ωραίος ωρέ ο κριουλιάρης ! :up: :ROTF:

Νice one Chris ! :up: There is more on that GTX285 though, keep 2k1ing it ;)

---

I will try something new but cards need a voltmod to work higher for nature....

:)
My second attempt with 9800GX2 at -40C, at low clocks 918/1145.
PCIe 124.1 MHz, second the Nature (LOL..).

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9489900

http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u..._93481_gpr.png


This is my rig :

http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u...h_IMG_1411.jpg http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u...h_IMG_1412.jpg http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u...h_IMG_1414.jpg

and this is my bech-room.


http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u...h_IMG_1415.jpg

ps1. i have run (till the best one) the CarLow 13 times !
ps2. i don’t have a backup.
ps3. i have change my signature...

Nice Nature ... so close to the 1400 mark :D

nice one with gx2 at low clocks :)

Quote:

---

...there's a time for everything... :D

---

:slapass: :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by massman

Nice Nature ... so close to the 1400 mark :D

---

I have play with lod.....to do this:) (the first run was 1407,x...)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hey

nice one with gx2 at low clocks :)



:slapass: :D

---

:rofl:

i think i will try in single category (in GREEN area...) so don;t tease me:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gprhellas

I have play with lod.....to do this:) (the first run was 1407,x...)



:rofl:

i think i will try in single category (in GREEN area...) so don;t tease me:D

---

Let's see you with a 285!!!!Thew more the marrier:D:D;)

Nice score BRO by the way.....

Awesome score gpr!!!!:up:
Well done!!!:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gprhellas

i think i will try in single category (in GREEN area...) so don;t tease me:D

---

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Maybe you will have a problem(don't forget hipro:p:).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gprhellas

:)
My second attempt with 9800GX2 at -40C, at low clocks 918/1145.
PCIe 124.1 MHz, second the Nature (LOL..).


http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u...h_IMG_1415.jpg

ps1. i have run (till the best one) the CarLow 13 times !
ps2. i don’t have a backup.
ps3. i have change my signature...

---

Outstanding picture. Old man teaches. I love it. :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SchnitzelDeluxe

Outstanding picture. Old man teaches. I love it. :D

---

Hm :confused:..... did you notice my old bench-chair ? it's older than my teacher keeboard.:) :D

ha ha

Nice score gprhellas!:up:

My GTX285 works again, so hunting continue^^

Sweet bench set-up George, and nice score.

http://forum.crazypc.ro/attachment.p...8&d=1240851091

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9481126

Trying new things with my gtx285


Futuremark link
http://service.futuremark.com/result...3&resultType=6

Image

http://www.hwbox.gr/images/imagehost...62e1dbe1ab.jpg


I believe 89900-90000 are doable with this card....

No FM URL as its just a first touch.

Not in a position to really compete anyway but seeing as im 387FPS off the limit in Nature (7740 points right there!) I reckon im not doing tooooo bad

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y38/K404/82681.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dinos22

nice moonman
what clocks on GPU?

either me and G H Z are not tweaking right or these 4870s are faster than 4890s :D

i've only had two quick test sessions....probably the earlier assumption :D

---

4890 is slower than 4870 per clock mate, they've changed various timings troughout the chip. 4870 at 830/950 marginally beats the stock 4890 (850/975).

First try with RE:D

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/5327/89809.jpg