Printable View
Ceevee, you are getting annoying, go make ur own thread if you want a tip to get more score in Vantage, JEEZ!
Even a baby knows that GTX 280 is the fastest card, BUT 4870 being $299 gives great performance and the performance are not far behind the 280, there*******fore 4870 IS the best bang for the bucks. And im not blind, the IQ comparison on AnandTech clearly tells me that ATI IQ is better at color, texture an the AA itself.
didnt realize that was a P score and not an X score when i posted. I m not super familiar with Vantage as of yet. But looking into it, it seems any 200 series nvidia score would be inflated due to physX and not translate into real world performance in games, so if performance crown is only judged by highest vantage score, then for the moment nvidia does have it, at quite a cost, but as for relevance, i think their share price and panic reflects the real situation with what ati has come to the table with.Quote:
Originally Posted by ceevee
LOL...he totally got owned.Quote:
Originally Posted by AriciU
WTF. This is about 4870 review now turned into stubborn GTX 280 owners justifying their purchases...
smells like that glad i waited out ...Quote:
Originally Posted by clayton
Please, feel free to post a score from 4870CF that is competitive...Quote:
Originally Posted by AriciU
Go on...
We are waiting...
....
.... :shakes:
You'll find competitive scores in the Xtreme 3dMark section in the next couple of weeks.
...for you to make your own thread, and stop crapping in this one. Give it a rest already, every single person acknowledges the GTX280 is the performance king, your self esteem is safe and in tact.Quote:
Originally Posted by ceevee
Now let the rest of us discuss the 4870, thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ceevee
umm yeah, how about you post a score like that??? oh wait your running a 700$ nvidia card on an intel mobo when you could be running 4870 CF to beat your card easily and cheaper. please stop with your crap, you didn't even respond to the fact that nvida's IQ is bad and your "fast" card is indeed faster yet displaying a MUCh lower quality image. just look at the bricks in those screens at anand every single nvidia mode doesnt even have that highlights and texture detail that the 770 produces.
face it you made a poor purchase and you just have live with that dont suffocate us with you GT200 is god bull :banana::banana::banana::banana:
EDIT; sorry to feed the fire, but this guy just needs to be told whats up even if he doesnt aknowledge it because any lurkers on the thread are going to be mislead by his manipulative posting style (cmon comparing a phase run to a regular run on a benchmark that already favors nvidia heavily for the sole reason that nvidia paid more to have it that way)
oh well is see the nvidia PR department is still going on here ,and on,and no:down:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNiiPE_DoGG
Actually my ASUS Stiker II EXTREME and additional MSI 650Mhz GTX280s arrive via UPS today. ;)
so IQ is no concern to you, your just gonna sit and run vantage all day????"Quote:
Originally Posted by ceevee
Good luck with that one! ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ceevee
I think that's being deliberately ignored.Quote:
Originally Posted by LOE
My 4870 will arrive tomorrow, yay! Been an nVidia user my whole life, now its time to taste some ATIness. :)
considering that it should more than doubles the cpu physics test that dose make a huge diffrence, and your numbers are flawed your comparing stock and 3.6ghz runs to a 4.5ghz with ln2 or phase on everythingQuote:
Originally Posted by ceevee
and did u look at this
http://anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3341&p=11
it shows that at max NV is the about IQ as ati with 4x msaa, and its missing texture shading
also buying a striker 2 extreme just shows your ignorance, for 24/7 buying a board that need and extreme edition cpu since the fsb is limmited
Min and MAX FPSQuote:
Originally Posted by roadie
Very good review, shows that I am best to wait for the 1GB version as despite what some might say..512MB of VRAM does not cut it.
I like the page where you see a minimum of 0.8 FPS on the HD4850 1.9 FPS on the Crossfire HD4870 vs a minimum of 7.1FPS on the 896MB GX260 to me that smacks of lack of VRAM.
John
@zanzabar
yeah legit has an article on that as well... i mean its out there
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/733/1/
Could you rewrite this sentence because the grammar is so bad I have no idea what you are trying to say.Quote:
Originally Posted by zanzabar
Why should I care about FSB when I have a QX9770?
most 45nm quads have a wall at 470-500mhz anyway (even on X38/48).Quote:
Originally Posted by zanzabar
http://images.tweaktown.com/imagebank/cfx487_g_10.gif
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/14..._af/index.html
Look here Ceevee, Tri Crossfire HD4870s outperform Tri-SLI GTX 280! Not to mention those GTX 280s are overclocked! LOL.
Also the vantage pic you posted, it was on an overclocked quad core @ 4.8GHz + overclocked GTX 280s vs STOCK HD4870s. Nice comparison, moron :rolleyes:
Once AMD releases HD4870 X2, it will outperform the GTX 280 for $150 cheaper LOL.
:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by ceevee
Yea good luck overclocking your quad with just multipliers... I could imagine, 333quad pumped FSB at 14x multi = bottlenecked quad core.
who says ati wont raise the prices, now that they know that the 4870 can competent with the 280gtx, and X2 will be faste then a 280gtx, there is no reason to sell it cheaper then a 280gtx.Quote:
Originally Posted by Clairvoyant129
I dont think any company is that nice to give away performance for free. ;)
The name calling and vitriol in this thread is unbelievable. Really, really nasty people on XS now, wasn't like that when I joined.Quote:
Originally Posted by Clairvoyant129
Anyway the main difference between triSLI and 3xCrossfire is that one of them almost always works and the other usually performs worse than a single card. Yeah thats a good value for your money. :rolleyes:
good thing that a 790i can hit 420-430 without any effort. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Clairvoyant129