Vista Ultimate 64 with RT 3.15
when you close RT it returns RealTemp Has Stopped Working error :(
Printable View
Vista Ultimate 64 with RT 3.15
when you close RT it returns RealTemp Has Stopped Working error :(
I dunno. I've tried to closed it from tray or from that X button and works flawless. Launched from shortcut or direct exe from folder, no problems whatsoever. :shrug:
Vista64 Ultimate SP1, all updates.
Sorry Kevin I can't help you with this. :(
A direct Tc measurement experiment on a G0 Q6600.
The Fluke 179 and the thermocouple.
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237054474
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237054555
Tests to check for accuracy. Ice/water and boiling water. Elevation < 30m. Seems pretty accurate.
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237054653
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237054853
The thermocouple leads are way too large for the installation per Intel. http://download.intel.com/design/pro...nex/315594.pdf, pp78-96.
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237055295
Drilled a hole through the center of a stock HS for the sensor insertion (thank you rge for the idea) and a hole on the top center of the CPU IHS deep enough so the tip of the sensor can be positioned below the top surface of the IHS as indicated by Intel.
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237057796
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237058316
CPU installed.
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237058357
HS installed with a drill bit used to maintain the alignment of the holes, then the sensor, and then the fan.
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237058538
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237058780
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237058803
Firing the rig up at 400x8!
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237059495
Temperatures at idle. I am running Everest v5 mainly to monitor the mobo CPU thermal diode temperatures, reported in Everest as the “CPU temperature.” The Real Temp with 100 Tjmax setting and calibrated per unclewebb/rge's instructions will keep the tab on the CPU core temperatures.
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237060172
Temps running HCI Design Memtest.
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237060401
2 instances of the HCI Design Memtest.
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237060635
Running 3 and 4 instances of the HCI Design Memtest did not yield any further temperature increases, so moving on to Prime at large FFT, non in-place custom test.
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237060987
Prime small FFT’s.
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237061047
Then the IBT.
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237061103
Vcore increased to elevate the temperatures.
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237062963
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237063022
PROCHOT# in action.
http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1237063149
Vatos_locos: I might have to try going back to the previous WinRing0 version.
burebista is using Vista x64 without any issues so I'll try a few different combos to see if I can re-create this error and find out what's going on.
pyongmu: Thanks for your testing. It's interesting that in your final picture when your CPU was thermal throttling that it was showing a TCase reading of 71.7C which is about equal to the 71C TCase rating for the Q6600 - G0. The Intel theory is that if you keep your maximum TCase temperature at or below the rated TCase temperature then you shouldn't have to worry about your processor throttling and that last picture shows that.
Yes, that basically is my conclusion of my experiment.
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/...lTempBeta2.zip
About the time this Illegal Operation closing bug arrived is also when I switched to the new WinRing0 x64 library. I don't think the two problems are related but just to try I switched back to the previous WinRing0 library for RealTemp 3.16.
pyongmu: Did you see anything interesting or unusual during your testing. Linpack testing seems to create one of the largest gradients between Tcase and core temperature. Overall your results seem similar to what rge found during his testing.
Log Name: ApplicationQuote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
Source: SideBySide
Date: 14.3.2009 22:42:34
Event ID: 33
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: SoLoR
Description:
Activation context generation failed for "D:\System Tools\RealTempBeta_3.16\RealTemp.exe". Dependent Assembly Microsoft.VC90.MFC,processorArchitecture="x86",pub licKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",versio n="9.0.21022.8" could not be found. Please use sxstrace.exe for detailed diagnosis.
and it doesnt want to start, but i guess it doesnt matter, since you probably wll go back to new library anyway.
edit: this is on win7 x64 build 7057 and no i dont get any close bug with old versions, just feel compelled to try every new beta version of every software im using ;)
SoLoR: Just curious. After you did the download did you unzip the folder and try to run that new folder from your Desktop?
That's what I like to hear. :up:Quote:
just feel compelled to try every new beta version of every software im using
no, i have folder "System Tools" on non windows partition and i put all this mini programs there, i just renamed it so version is obvious from folder name. Also only account im using is built in "Administrator" account.Quote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
Hey Unclewebb,,my realtemp 3.15 or 3.16 won't start, it gives me an error to reinstall. 3.14 works A-OK though. Thanks for all your Hard work as well.
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/...alTempBeta.zip
This new compiler is all new to me so while I learn about that and how to distribute files correctly you can try 3.17. It has the MFC stuff linked into it and should at least start-up OK. Then I can get back to fixing the other problem. :)
Thanks a Bunch Kevin.
Does that mean 3.17 finally worked? I hope so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandit_44
3.17 worked on my windows 7 64 bit. 3.16 I got same start error as Bandit listed above.
Pyongmu, nice job on testing Q6600. My core 2 duo had nearly same 15C gradient using prime, and 25+C gradient using linpack...interesting to see quad do nearly the same. Also your data shows how futile it is to use software to measure tcase (cpu temp) when the sensor is located in the wrong location, ie between cores instead of in the IHS. Most bioses calibrate the cpu sensor about 10C cooler than its true location temp, so it can approximate IHS temp at moderate load (despite being in core substrate). Which means it will read 5-6C too low at idle as your testing shows, near accurate with 10-12C gradient loads (just few C off with moderate loads), and read still way to high with linpack type loads that create 25-27C gradients (since calibrated for ~10-15C load gradients).
Yes sir it worked perfectly. Sorry i didn't post that in the previous post but company walked in about the time i sat down to try it. Thanks Again.
It took all day but I finally figured out what I was doing wrong before. I left out a manifest file or two.
I'm just installing the updated SDK so there might be a 3.18 before bedtime. ;)
3.17 and 3.18 are about the same but some people like burebista prefer to use the MFC library as shared.
small RealTemp + big bloated MFC library or big RealTemp with embedded library = pretty much the same damn thing for most users but burebista claims small RealTemp is quicker starting up so I won't argue.
pyongmu: I'll try to include a link to your testing in the docs when I update them. Us Xtreme types like seeing stuff like that. :up:
Well I know you've heard this a 1000 times,,but Realtemp Rocks and so do you for contributing such a Helpful and Important App! Thanks Again for all you do for us Xtreme guys!
I really like it uncle you're a genius! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
thank you very much uncle for the hard work & for the djsub edition! :D :up:
god bless & more power so you can always give us the latest & the best temp monitoring program for the proc & gpu. :worship:
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/...lTempBeta2.zip
The final version of the night. Get it before I wake up and change it one more time.
It includes the correct manifest files and MFC dll files and other baggage that makes Visual Studio 2008 so great. ;)
I tested it on Win 7 x64, Vista x86 and XP x86. Does it work on your computer? If you are using Vista x64 does RT3.17 or RT3.18 shut down without an error?
Your welcome Bandit_44. The best thing about RealTemp are all of the XS users that have helped out with this project. 24/7 there's always someone willing to check out the latest version and give me some feedback on what I did right or what I screwed up. It's good to be part of the community here.
I knew there would be at least one happy user with the latest version. Thanks for your suggestions. It looks great.Quote:
thank you very much uncle for the hard work & for the djsub edition! :up::
v3.18 - error "Realtemp has stopped working" still exists in vista x64.
3.18 is OK here. Opening fast, closing without errors.
all users of realtemp will be happy about it not just me :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
take a look at this. a match made in heaven :D :up:
http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/248...deinheaven.png
still getting closing error with 3.18
Uncle, I guess this will make you very happy :D Thanks to your support I noticed that I had problems with HAL. Fixed and no new OS install :up:
3.18 works normaly for me.