Quote:
Originally Posted by YanBooth
The DFI Smart Guardian (it's on the DFI CD that came with the motherboard).
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by YanBooth
The DFI Smart Guardian (it's on the DFI CD that came with the motherboard).
2750 MHz @ 1.488V @ 48°C peak-load (2x Prime95 v24.13, 1h)Quote:
Originally Posted by Charloz24
2805 MHz @ 1.536V @ 54°C peak-load (2x Prime95 v24.13, 1h)
Temperatures are way too high for more OC. I am quite sure that the heatspreader is holding me back.
Got 28°C idle with 2.8@1.5 and 54°C peak-load dual-P95. That's more than 25K delta!
I'll need to cut the HS off for higher clocks and more juice. My SanDiego's had 15-20°C delta under load with HS and only 8-10K delta load without HS. I suppose my X2 will only have 10-13K delta load without HS.
Martin
Martin, removing the IHS may or may not provide the temp drop you're looking for. The simple fact is that these X2s run about 5-10C higher than single-cores at similar speeds/voltages. I have been loading mine at 2.7GHz with 1.55V for two weeks now, and the temps range from 59C-64C, but the machine runs solid.
Mine 4400+ doesnt like very much high HTT,iam running it at 270x11 1.525*1.04 using a modded Prometeia Mach I.........
CCBWE 0522TPMW
1266148F50193
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=33892&stc=1
looks nice, is it stable at that speed? cinebench?
Yes its rock stable iam running 2x folding clients for 2 days now with no errors.....
that's really nice, going for 3GHz soon?
Would you mind running CineBench, if you find time that is ;)
Damn that makes me wanna have a X2, AMD bring them damn 3800+ now !! :D
hehe, no more venice for you? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by sai
I Love my X2.........:slap:
http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/666...52248114ru.jpg
God I hate it, the chip here is a sucker in my eyes. Let's hope at least it doesn't have probs with my Mach2. I'm hoping for 3050mhz stable. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by lv_88
@lv_88 requested cinebench.........
@sai I can run it at 3020 but the prometeia with R404 can't handle the load because for only 50MHz from 2970 to 3020 needs 1.65V from 1.575............
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=33895&stc=1
those results are really good to me, thx for running it ;)
Sai: hehe, good luck ;)
so which oc better the 4200+ or the 4400+?
wasn't talking to you :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorLite
LOL sorry read first--->post after......:slap: :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by sai
4200.Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsRejection
lil biased since you have a 4200+ no?Quote:
Originally Posted by terror_adagio
I'd say it no matter which X2 I had.
So far from users who I know who have X2s, the 4200s are OC a bit more than the 4400.
how high do the 4400's go? I'm looking to hit your speed.
I doubt it......... :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by terror_adagio
.... if that's the case, you're still giving up the cache aren't ya. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by terror_adagio
The 4400's seem to be doing 'bout 2.6 to 2.65 depending on cooling ........ The 4800's are doing 2.7 to 2.8. The premium price paid for the 4800 is pretty ridiculous for a 100MHz clock increase..... And damn! I own one..... :p: :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsRejection
ok well my goal is 11x240 with a 166 Mhz divider give me 2640 Mhz. I hope to god I can do it.
If I can then after a week of burning in I will try 9x300 with a 133 Mhz divider hehe. 2700 Mhz out of that bad boy would be very very cool.
That depends if the 4200 becomes memory bandwidth limited before the 4400 does when running dual bandwidth heavy tasks.Quote:
Originally Posted by pcdoc1
In reality overclocking these beasts is more reliant on memory bandwidth than ever..
If you can't get the bandwidth up then the cache is more benifit than pure core speed as the faster core will be stalled more often.