put away your X58 boards, because now they look fLucking stupid eheh
Printable View
put away your X58 boards, because now they look fLucking stupid eheh
Even single channel with SandyB is faster?Quote:
Originally Posted by youngpro
hahaha get your single channel 800mhz 10-11-10-28 kits ready!
this morning i've benched using the Single Stage for about 2 hours, this is what came out.
6.xx
5048.3......Mafio...............6.59.203....21x240 .......961MHz.....6-6-5-18....2/8....X58Code:config:
i7-950 #3936A695
EVGA 3-way SLI Classified - bios 77
Kingston HyperX 3x2 GB 2000 cas8 MGH-E-Hyper
nVidia 6200LE 256 MB PCI-E
WD scorpio 160 GB
PC Power & Cooling 1200 watt
2003 Server TW tweaked + custom CW
1.2 HP rotary Single Stage
http://mafio.host56.com/imagehosting/?dt=12129276239616 http://mafio.host56.com/imagehosting/?dt=5129276233911
http://mafio.host56.com/imagehosting/?di=212927621414
king of the hill!!!
evga ....win
olive ....win
240bclk ....win
45nm....WTFwin
you forgot to mention the kingston's head...that's the tweak that makes my 32M that fast :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Hondacity
too bad that in the next weeks SB will kick our asses. :D
this 950 at the first touch seems not that good, it was so damn hot - that is a good thing - but was a poor clocker.
4 weeks ago i figured out that the problem was the IHS...checked with the calibre and find out that this CPU have the worst IHS i've ever seen...i have lapped the CPU and than retried the CPU using the Single Stage...in 10 minutes i find out that i've gained 150/200 MHZ only with lapping.
if this gain will remain the same probably this chip will bench 32M at around 5400 MHZ at LN2...i need to refill the dewar and give it a try.
BTW i'm still on 45nm because the only 980x i tried was a PURE CRAP, CB in triple channel around -120° C, crappy uncore, poor ram clocking and with VCORE 1.85 volt reach less than 5.7 GHZ for 32M and 5.4 GHZ for vantage...the only good thing is that i haven't bought it :ROTF:
i don't wanna spend 1000 € and get a crap CPU and in any case being pwned by guys that use A0 chips.
i do overclock because i like it and because it makes me happy...i don't care if my name isn't in the HWbot "hall of fame"...i don't need to be #1 or use high end stuff to enjoy the overclock.
sorry for the OT. :)
kingston indeed ftw!
you still have 12days to be on top :D, nice work with the taiwanese os? i don't read kungfu lol
ahahahahQuote:
Originally Posted by Hondacity
i also don't know a single word of chinese but i know windows quite good, so the language used isn't a big problem :D
you should try TW 2003 server, it's a bit faster than the other versions i've used in the past.
ahh thanks 4tip man...we ought to stop spamming this thread lol
Beautiful 32M there mafio, congrats! At those mem speeds 6-6-5-18 is kind of the best it can get, I envy you :P
*Update*
We should work on Sandy-Bridge-support for CPU-Tweaker.
@George: Sandy Bridge meets Super Pi: http://extreme.pcgameshardware.de/be...-cpu-takt.html ;)
4382,4......chew*......14:59:437......273.9x16 ......1095.6mhz......7-9-7-15-1T......1/4......AM3
http://chew.ln2cooling.com/qdig-file...erthorn32m.jpg
mafio just saw that results very very impressive mate, everything is right up there...
i really like that 960 6-6-5, need a very nice kit of mems to do that on air!
brian great to see some AMD results up in here also!
Have been playing in the HCC contest a bit. Flares + Xpower = efficiency, me thinks
Without copy-waza: http://hwbot.org/community/submissio...min_59sec_78ms
With:
http://hwbot.org/blog/wp-content//758641.png
have you got one of those crazy minds that can compare benchmarks at different frequencies against each other? :clap::clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
how do you know if 4450~ is efficient, i really suck at comparing obscure frequencies
Thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by youngpro
Ehh that result is so/so.
I screwed up my OS by that point, lost 3 secs.
Should be doable with 4350.
Just compare the results in this thread (low-clock, therefore tweaked) to your own score. Also comparing how you stack up in the hcc contest (time and cpu speed).Quote:
Originally Posted by youngpro
My definition of 'efficient' is 'it does not suck monkeyballs'. Yes, I set bars low.
Did you realize that was going to get sigged when you wrote it? :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
:rofl:
Yes.
This is preety hilarious :ROTF:
Love it! :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by K404
Nice :D
There's one loop after 'efficiency - yes', namely 'beat youngpro?'.
The answer is always no, though ... so i don't think it's necessary to include.
*Update*
@all: CPU-Tweaker is not ready for Sandy Bridge yet, so let's wait a bit.
@Massman: Should I be afraid about my hwbot account, if I tell you that the indispensable tab CPU-Z/Memory is unfortunately not included? :yawn::rofl:
Well, I think there's too many pink colored 32nm lovin.:wave:
5617.8......Moonman............6.59.375....22x255. .....1021MHz.....7-7-5-20....4/16..P55
http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/6...cclarksub7.jpg
4732.3......Moonman............7.59.156....18x263. .....1052MHz.....7-7-5-20....4/16..P55
http://img593.imageshack.us/img593/4...clarksub8i.jpg
4136.3......Moonman............8.59.265....16x258. .....1034MHz.....7-7-5-20....4/16..P55
http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/5122/lccclarksub9.jpg