Ok, it is off topic .. just to wrap up... You can get LameMP3 multithreaded, photoshop does multithread, and taskmanager is just as good as any to see CPU loading -- it answers the multhtreaded part. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedjo
Jack
Printable View
Ok, it is off topic .. just to wrap up... You can get LameMP3 multithreaded, photoshop does multithread, and taskmanager is just as good as any to see CPU loading -- it answers the multhtreaded part. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedjo
Jack
Gentlemen;
Knock off the personal attacks please.
Not needed, not wanted, against forum policies and belittles your own argument.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DIE-TEMP
I said "sucks"?:confused::rofl: Please don't be a jerk and pin comments on a posters that wasn't made. That's truly silly and childish.
What I did say was AMD and Intel have taken a turns the last few years being the market leader. I'm not buying 2nd place unless there's a good reason to do so. IMHO, there isn't one.
I have and will continue to dis AMD, that's AMD, not your mom or sister so stop acting like my dismissing AMD is personal attack on you! If it makes you feel better, Intel Sucks!
Donnie27 last 15 Computers, 8 AMD and 7 Intel based, some Fanboy uh? If AMD's next is better, that will be 9 to 6:rolleyes:
My Q6600 @ 2.66GHz does 3092/10985 in Cinebench which is a little more than the Q9450 they compared. Kinda interested in their Penryn rig setup. But impressed with Nehalem anyway.
Did you have done the test with vista 32 bits, like they do?Quote:
Originally Posted by John600rr
I'm not being a jerk...I'm not the guy maintaining I'm not a fanboy then producing statements like....Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnie27
All of a sudden I'm acting like they're my mom and sister? Are you for real? Where do you get this from? I'm not the fanboy remember, I don't get upset about either manufacturer. I merely stated that some of your comments (like the last one I quoted) are childish....seems I hit a nerve. Like I say....people that make comments such as those, with words like "sucks" need to expand they're vocabulary a little. Which is often acheived by the time they leave school.Quote:
I have and will continue to dis AMD, that's AMD, not your mom or sister so stop acting like my dismissing AMD is personal attack on you! If it makes you feel better, Intel Sucks!
good, I'm glad to hear it.Quote:
Donnie27 last 15 Computers, 8 AMD and 7 Intel based, some Fanboy uh? If AMD's next is better, that will be 9 to 6:rolleyes:
What a low FSB
And HT :D
That's so old skool, Pentium 4 form 2005 had that
theres no fsb in nehalem the 133mhz is the clock of qpi interconnect (same as HT on amd)Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenEye
Nah, Vista 64 Bit, but thats what they used I thought...Quote:
Originally Posted by nemrod
http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/int...spx?i=3326&p=7
Edit: Just noticed, the screen shot shows a Q9650 and the graph lists a Q9450.
Their Q9450 is probably just a QX9650 with 8x multiplier.Quote:
Originally Posted by John600rr
No reason to have several different CPU's when you can emulate them with one.
You are being a Jerk when you're quoting crap I didn't post LOL!Quote:
Originally Posted by DIE-TEMP
Then merely post where you disagree with me? Pretty simple concept to follow. I didn't post AMD Sucks in this thread. I said if and when AMD had something worthwhile, I'm on it. I'm a consumer FIRST. I, just me, worry about MY Wallet, not Intel's or AMD's. That's what most in this forum, myself include, has always done.Quote:
All of a sudden I'm acting like they're my mom and sister? Are you for real? Where do you get this from? I'm not the fanboy remember, I don't get upset about either manufacturer. I merely stated that some of your comments (like the last one I quoted) are childish....seems I hit a nerve. Like I say....people that make comments such as those, with words like "sucks" need to expand they're vocabulary a little. Which is often acheived by the time they leave school.
Again, money talks and BS walks. I know TRUE Fanboys who are 100% Loyal and have AMD or Intel Bumper Stickers, T-Shirts and one guy even bought a AMD like Green Mustang in homage to AMD, I asked when was he getting the Green Arrow painted on it:rofl: I know an Intel Fanboy who stopped speaking to me for a month after I built my 3500+ system, and got another bud to buy a 3800+ X2:rolleyes: That's why I have a very low opinion of Fans in General and don't visit sites like the AMDZone or Intel Fan Sites. For the most part they are a waste of time.:DQuote:
good, I'm glad to hear it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoThr3k
If that's true, as you say, link me to it (my saying that). You and others should really try to remove your personal feelings out of your posts? :rofl::ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by DT
No time to go digging up forum posts bud......but it's evident in the manner you post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnie27
All I said was I'm sceptical of your neutrality due to the way you post (often positively about Intel but dismisive of AMD) as I don't believe people who genuinely have a love for technology and a neutral standpoint would ever dismiss other tech entirely simply due to it being a little slower/less powerful. That's certainly how I read quite a lot of your posts. Perhaps you don't do it deliberately but you do it nonetheless.
I agree with you about fanboys, and perhaps I've read a little too much into some of your posts...... I ain't arguing with you and I concede you seem to be pretty clued up. I just thought I'd voice my opinion though. :)
<< Now back to fighting these crummy temps :(
that 2% performance improvement over c2d in cinebench (the only single threaded app they ran?) was incredibly unimpressive
given that it's doubtful it'll clock like c2d at launch it's a slightly uninteresting architecture imo
*to the end of the article*
hell, im still buying amd processors, i mean jesus it was dirt cheap and im using it for a htpc so who gives a ****. i cant wait for Nehalem but AMD has and always will have that place in my heart that it can fill :D plus the fact that it was dirt cheap really make me take kindly to AMD once again cus i can build a damn good computer for little to nothing :)
thats kind of a poor analogy.Quote:
Originally Posted by eleeter
heres a better one....most roads are single lane only a few are multilanes , just depends on where you drive.
To Donnie and everyone else who encountered that troll, I apologize.
DIE-TEMP is gone now....we'll try to pick him up sooner when he makes his 10th (+?) account.
ip ban necassary? anyways, nehalems performcance is pretty impressive. I hope that the same goes for the cheaper lga 1160 cpus.
Then simply find one of the Posters here with the older model and have them run the test with a single channel of RAM. Even if they can't the higher Latency, that would level the testing playing field.Quote:
Originally Posted by hollo
Sorry , but you're jumping to conclusions way too fast.It's a single test where Nehalem's improvements play little role.You have to remember that Nehalem is still 4 way wide , just like Core.Quote:
Originally Posted by hollo
Yeah, 20% to 50% IPC improvement is so unimpressive. :rofl: The CPU tested was an ES on an immature motherboard running the RAM on single channel with crappy memory timings, so we can consider on additional unimpressive 5% to 10% IPC boost on retail products. :rolleyes:
For me on of the biggest thing is the platform integration on LGA1160/Mobile. And Fusion when it comes.
PCIe (and GPU with lowend) integration in the CPU. I guess SSDs will force SATA to go ondie aswell sooner or later.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shintai
hmm i dont know if i would be happy about this, since the sata controller allready make problems with high fsb ocing. :(
alot of people are assuming ondie memory control = no OCing like AMD but I doubt Intel would want to hurt its OCing **thinks** oh wait isn't Intel eliminating OCing on most of thier chips hummmmm