IMO, that looks like a ES using DDR3 not DDR5. Take a look at this (take note of the date it was submitted). 1002-9440 use GDDR3. We still have to wait to confirm the device ID for the 4870 is though.
Printable View
IMO, that looks like a ES using DDR3 not DDR5. Take a look at this (take note of the date it was submitted). 1002-9440 use GDDR3. We still have to wait to confirm the device ID for the 4870 is though.
Santa Claus visited me 10 minuts ago
http://img108.imageshack.us/img108/3113/fo1vf2.jpg
http://img108.imageshack.us/img108/4281/foii3.jpg
:p::p::p:
regards
Questions chaps.
How come all the cards that have been sent out to people to test have all been Power Color?
Anyone in the EU managed to buy a card today then?
Looking foward to your results mascaras. :)
That's just ridicules. HD4850 is everywhere and it hasn't even launched yet. Wtf.
Uber-Hard launch lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SimBy
Well the cards were out at retailers near the beginning of the month. Bit of a logistical problem it seems.
I think theres gonna be many angry folks under NDA out there.
When do we expect a review ? :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by mascaras
Quote:
Originally Posted by mascaras
DAMIT! I want one too :mad:
Santa is arriving too early this year :D
Gratz Mascaras ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by mascaras
Now get to work mate!
We all are eager for some home results and your GTX280 vs HD4850 (Single and Xfire) :)
@mascaras, you're a lucky guy :). I have one more request :rolleyes:. Is it a problem to start the tests with single 4850, because we've seen a lot ot CF tests and the whole world waits for the single tests :). Thanks in advance :cool:
I liked the non edited version more :D.Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
Too bad for them. Don't ever sign NDA's.Quote:
Originally Posted by SimBy
Awesome news Mascaras !!! :cool:
Please make sure to have HD screenshots like last time :D
Perkam
Quick test
Crysis - Single Card
E8400 @ 4Ghz
HD4850 Default
Windows Vista 64 bit (Not fresh install @ Nvidia 6600 before)
Catalyst 8.5 (CD)
Crysis @ 1680x1050 @ High Setings @ DX9
http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/9...highdx9qr0.jpg
Average = 34.5 Fps
------------------------------------------------------------------
Crysis @ 1680x1050 @ High Setings @ DX10
http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/8...ughdx10sm1.jpg
Average = 31.5 Fps
--------------------------------------------------------------
BFG 9800GTX @ Crysis @ 1680x1050 @ High Setings @ DX10
http://img387.imageshack.us/img387/9...sisdx10uu4.jpg
Average = 34.5 Fps
:thumbsup:
:up:
That was fast. So it seems its slightly slower than 9800GTX in Crysis.
Waiting for CF scaling and other games! :up:
AA vs no AA is TOP priority here :D
Yeah, what about AA?
That is 34½ not 35
and 31½ not 32.:p:
Also, 4850 is done on Vista build 6156 (SP1)
9800GTX on older Vista build 5767
Hopefully you redo tests. I'm sure you will.... :p::up:
Quote:
Originally Posted by annihilat0r
wait , received cards 10 minuts" ago :p:
Powercolor HD4850 Default @ Crysis @ 1920x1080 @ High Setings @ DX9
http://img131.imageshack.us/img131/6...1080dx9vn8.jpg
Average = 31.3 Fps
:up:
with AA this is not playable.
It's not interesting to do unplable tests.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unbornchild
yes , Vista is same , differenc is SP1 , with 9800GTX SP2 beta , with hd4850 SP1 final , anyway just to have something to compare +-
:up:
31fps it's not thaat playable, It's just for comparison....
a HD3870 would do a lot less than that (31fps@dx9 high 1080p)?
31fps is playable, but it's without AA.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spectrobozo
And i was saying it's not usefull to bench AA because below it couln'd be playable. ;)
It´s 1920 4xAA 16x AF ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyz