Its nice, that I can test now Sensor Test on mobile CPU too in RC8, thanks :yepp:
Before on some beta or 2.70 I think it was disabled, but now all works fine, thanks. My lappy with E8300 showed movement 9 and 22 :shakes:
Printable View
Its nice, that I can test now Sensor Test on mobile CPU too in RC8, thanks :yepp:
Before on some beta or 2.70 I think it was disabled, but now all works fine, thanks. My lappy with E8300 showed movement 9 and 22 :shakes:
That's a great update Uncle, thanks... I was going to use the EVGA precision tool to monitor gpu temps in games, but seeing it on the screen bothered me. Now I can check the gpu and cpu log file after without seeing extra stuff on screen. You the man!!
Thanks Uncle ! :up: - for updates & New features
just noticed ( compare RT v2.90 RC1 - to-> RT v2.90 RC8 @ the moment )
RC8 does not show ( chnanges in readouts ) when SpeedStep ( Eist / C1E )
is down-clocing CPU .. don't know was it it just designed so ?
Any way - thats no problem for my self ... just let You know .. if it makes sense ..
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/7...eqrtci1.th.png
Kashelz: I decided to stop playing the nanny and opened up the sensor test to mobile CPUs. If it was my laptop, I probably wouldn't run the CPU Cool Down Test on a mobile chip but any computer should be able to handle a couple of minutes of Prime95 without going ka-boom. After the first test, the load and temps will start to drop so everything should be OK. The final results might not be as meaningful due to the fact that desktop computers tend to have a lot better CPU cooling than laptops do.
SportsFanBoy: Thanks. After a game you should be able to go to your system tray and check out your maximum GPU and CPU temps. The pop-up when you hover your mouse for 5 seconds just below where the GPU 43C info is displayed will also let you know what the temps got up to. Place the mouse where the blue arrow is in the picture on the previous page. (post 3049)
i43: Thanks for noticing that. I changed one small thing during testing and forgot to change it back. I'll get that fixed up so it works like before.
Unclewebb,
I noticed that in the latest beta TJMax for the QX6800 B3 has changed from 85C to 100C. What's up?
Thanks!
ATI temps would be nice :)
uncle, check your e-mail!
hmmnnn ... downloaded the latest version of 2.90, and now I can only see 2 cores on my i7 920 ...
Previously, rge had a problem where RealTemp was showing 4 cores for his Core i7 940 even though he had two of them turned off in the bios. I came up with a fix for him that took care of that problem but maybe my fix is still a work in progress. When you run CPU-Z does it show 4 cores / 8 threads? Post or send me a screen shot of CPU-Z and RealTemp so I can have a look.Quote:
Originally Posted by shazza
I was wondering to myself yesterday, "I wonder how long it's going to take someone to ask me to include ATI GPU temps." Not long at all! :)Quote:
ATI temps would be nice
fgw: Thanks for the info.
Can you post or send me a screen shot of CPU-Z and RealTemp? CPU-Z shows me the ID string that RealTemp reads to determine your CPU version. I can't remember changing anything lately so I need to have a look. Does RealTemp still detect your CPU as a QX6800? Also try clicking on the Defaults button in the Settings window to see if that changes anything.Quote:
drminer: I noticed that in the latest beta TJMax for the QX6800 B3 has changed from 85C to 100C. What's up?
Thanks for the quick response! CPU-Z shows 4 cores. Also, here are screenshots of OCCT and my new Real Temp:
http://shazza53.smugmug.com/photos/4...78_XusyW-S.jpg http://shazza53.smugmug.com/photos/4...83_tKwkR-S.jpg
Works OK for me. :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by i43
Attachment 92497
I'm back to showing four cores with the newest version of RT ...
I had HyperThreading disabled when I only saw two cores. Enabled HT, and now seeing all four again :shrug: I should have realized this since CPU-Z showed 4 cores, 4 threads, but thanks to uncle's help ... I've got that part straightened out:
http://shazza53.smugmug.com/photos/4...01_a2ji9-M.jpg
Time for a tweak and a bug fix or two.
At least the GPU temps are looking good in these recent screen shots. :D
Thanks once again unc, outstanding! :up:
http://lakesidepc.com/rtss18.jpg
With 2.90 rc8 only get 2 cores displayed of i7 920. 2.90 rc4 works fine, showing all 4 cores.
Do you have Hyper Threading enabled or disabled? I had the same issue with HT disabled. Works fine now that I've enabled HT again.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGill
I believe uncle is working on it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by i43
I'm in the same boat as i43 though I am wondering if it is because the Black Ops bios disables EIST when the CPU clock ratio unlock is enabled in the bios, I'll reboot to check and post back.Quote:
Originally Posted by burebista
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/3...angehk6.th.png
GPU temp display is awesome unclewebb, tyvm
:up:
EDIT:
That wasn't the problem it seems
http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/3...nge2yv7.th.jpg
:shrug:
Unclewebb,
I reset the latest beta to the default settings, and it still shows TJMax for the QX6800 B3 as 100C, instead of 85C, as in previous versions. It does correctly identify the CPU as QX6800, by the way. I have attached a screenprint of CPUZ and RealTemp as you requested.
Thanks!
Hang tight guys. Bug fixes are on the way. When you make too many changes at the same time, screwing up one or two or three things isn't unusual.
Maybe all the bugs were deliberate so people would come here and post some screen shots so I could see how many of you are enjoying the new GPU temps. :D
at me it cant recognize my 4850 so it gives me something like this :p
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/...alTempBeta.zip
Maybe this version should be called, "the return of the missing cores." I'm hoping for that anyhow.
rge did a lot of testing for me today and noticed that his board assigns threads to cores in a very random order at times.
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/2...eapicidya5.png
The theory is that this helps spread the work load to all of the cores. If RealTemp is properly finding the cores again, then it should organize them into the correct physical order.
The bug with C1E/EIST should be fixed and the code I added to handle the Q9100 processors that screwed up the detection code for the QX6800 has been fixed too.
The first person to post a screen shot of RealTemp working properly with hyper threading turned off with a Core i7 will win a prize. :)
Vatos_locos: Unfortunately, RealTemp only reads the Nvidia GPU temp sensor at the moment. I thought about buying a cheap Nvidia card today to save me the hassle of writing some ATI code. If I trip over some code for reading the ATI sensors, I'll probably add that to RealTemp in the future.
LOL ... just happened to check this thread before heading off to bed, but please ... give the prize to the second person so we can keep the excitement going :)
http://shazza53.smugmug.com/photos/4...83_uQ2mj-M.jpg
Thanks shazza for first bringing this problem to my attention and thanks for showing that RealTemp is working correctly again.
rge also sent me a PM with this info
2 cores active HT on and off gives 2 core temps.
3 cores active HT on and off gives 3 core temps.
4 cores active HT on and off gives 4 core temps.
and one of these. :up:
If his APIC ID is still all mixed up tomorrow he might drop by and give an example of how some programs organize the temperature data based on the correct physical location and how some other programs, don't.
Edit: I'm still looking for a tester with an SLI setup. RealTemp is designed to report the highest GPU temperature if you have multiple GPUs so I'm hoping someone can post an example that shows if this new feature works or not. A comparison to a program like GPU-Z would be great.
I am using 2,86 I think and it's working fine on my i7. Lowest temp i7 can display is -8, so I got -8C on all cores :D
Unless I got enough Vcore and fire up linpack, then I can get into positive range - need to check the mount I think :(
:up::up::up:
Thanks again for this great application ... and for how quickly you fix things. Is the fact that threads are being assigned to different cores in a random manner also partially responsible for some of the temp differences between cores?
Here's a screenshot of GPU temps for my SLI setup at idle (GTX 260, 55nm) . Real Temp seems to be working fine.
http://shazza53.smugmug.com/photos/4...0_M7tdX-XL.jpg