32m Low Clock Challenge

bachus that mem clock is really doing my head in hehe and at such low vdimm!

here's my latest
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W...9s750ms_tn.png

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W...5s172ms_tn.png

Updated.. notify me about corrections. Nice work everyone and thanks for patience.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coop

Updated.. notify me about corrections. Nice work everyone and thanks for patience.

---

good to see dude

:toast: :toast:

This is an old run from a face off with eva2000 in which he ended up wiping the floor with me :). I was using a basically untweaked OS so I'm sure I could go faster now ;)

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n...Pi32M11m35.png

13m 54.297s @ below 3.6GHz :)

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b2...ne/32M3596.jpg

Man I've been trying for days to get into 13:5x with 400*9 1:1 but I just can't do it :( Even with much more aggressive mem times than OPB and bachus and now 2gb ram. Only got a 6 sec boost from that. Need to Vdimm mod my board.

:D Here's another one:

http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/4303/sp32m36ghzss3.jpg

E6600-Corsair XMS2 8500 2x1GB-P5WDG2-WS PRO-WC setup

:toast:

here are some mine 32M results

1st was made while OCing E6400 under DI @ 4340MHz : 12:05.672s
http://images.people.overclockers.ru/89334.png
2nd is testing X6800ES under DI @ 4601MHz : 11:24.531s
http://images.people.overclockers.ru/90247.png

Hey!

What is a good 32M time for a E6400 with 3600MHz? I'm at 15m 19s atm. :)

13m 26.047s @ 3.6GHz
Just a slightly tweaked system and using sabinu's tweak (pseudo-minimize tweak, that explains SPi right align :p: Thanks man :thumbsup: ).
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...513m26047s.png

Edit: A better shot ;)

Well, here is before edit :p:
13m 29.078s Monitor

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by corvus_corax

13m 29.078s @ 3.6GHz[/url]
Just a slightly tweaked system and using sabinu's tweak (pseudo-minimize tweak, that explains SPi right align :p: Thanks man :thumbsup: ).

---

Brilliant time :clap: :toast:

Care to explain these pseudo-minimize tweak, that explains SPi right align ??? :eek:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by alpha0ne

Brilliant time :clap: :toast:

Care to explain these pseudo-minimize tweak, that explains SPi right align ??? :eek:

---

Thanks alpha0ne :)
About pseudo-minimize, here sabinus explains the tweak:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sabinus

It's been a while since last tweaks were posted here.
Now I want to tell about one tweak that did help. It doesn't compare to copy-waza in terms of time gain but it gave me around ~0.1" for 1 MB SuperPI runs. Because of the nature of this tweak I think it is more helpful to 1 MB / 2MB runs then for 32 MB runs.
I call this tweak: pseudo-minimize because it resembles to minimize but it's not the same. It goes like this:

When all other tweaks are done (including realtime priority and copy-waza) and you are ready to launch SuperPI 1MB, then drag the bottom-right corner of the SuperPI window towards the upper-left corner untill the only thing left visible remains the small title bar of the window.

Then use the keyboard to launch SuperPI with the combination ALT+C then select the desired run (1MB, 2MB etc) with either the keyboard or mouse, then hit Enter (or click OK).

Finally, when the "PI calculation done!" message appears you should put the mouse pointer over the TaskBar, click the right button and select "Tile Windows Vertically" to see the whole SuperPI window and do the screeny fest ;)

---

Useful for 32M too :)

you are still missing the point people

i don't know how many times it needs to be repeated..............the idea is to get into the sub 13m/14m/15m etc times with lowest possible CPU MHz

so when you submit your time for sub 13m run the idea is to get to score around 12m 55-59.99s times with lowest possible CPU MHz.......for corvus that would mean raising the CPU MHz to lower the times from 13m 29s to JUST UNDER 13m

Sorry for missing the topic again, but maybe anyone of u guys can tell me, why my 32M times that bad?!

I tried Win2k3/WinXP with realtime and without and different ramclocks, both on clean windows. Normally i should go easy into the 13min imho, even without tweaked windows, but i just can get around 14min..

http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/7992/32langsamez7.jpg

Vcore 1,53V
Vdimm 2,4V

Any ideas? :toast:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dinos22

you are still missing the point people

i don't know how many times it needs to be repeated..............the idea is to get into the sub 13m/14m/15m etc times with lowest possible CPU MHz

so when you submit your time for sub 13m run the idea is to get to score around 12m 55-59.99s times with lowest possible CPU MHz.......for corvus that would mean raising the CPU MHz to lower the times from 13m 29s to JUST UNDER 13m

---

Hehehe thanks for bringing that up again dinos, ppl were posting +4GHz runs :slapass: :rolleyes:

@dinos: OK, i see, thanks for clarify. I saw just the last posts, so, i post my time :D. I'm gonna work in sub-13 ;) .

Edit: i'm eating the words with this new keyboard LOL

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by corvus_corax

@dinos: OK, i see, thanks for clarify. I saw just the last posts, so, i post my time :D. I gonna work on sub-13 ;) .

---

Hehe good luck, sub 13 @ under 3.60GHz will be very hard :fact: :)

Indeed alpha0ne
I'll need a higher freq :p: or to mod my P5B for vdimm higher and maybe running 2:3 (DDR2 1200MHz 4-4-4) cuz with 2.45V i can't get that.

Yes the only way would be using 2:3 with very tight timings and every tweak in the book :D ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by funkflix

Sorry for missing the topic again, but maybe anyone of u guys can tell me, why my 32M times that bad?!

I tried Win2k3/WinXP with realtime and without and different ramclocks, both on clean windows. Normally i should go easy into the 13min imho, even without tweaked windows, but i just can get around 14min..

http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/7992/32langsamez7

Vcore 1,53V
Vdimm 2,4V

Any ideas? :toast:

---

maybe create a new thread

just from initial things i'd say it's the 1333 that's hurting you badly there

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dinos22

maybe create a new thread

just from initial things i'd say it's the 1333 that's hurting you badly there

---

I'm not the guy who is creating new threads all the time. It's even more realistic to get fast and good help into here. ;)

Anyway, thx or ur answer, but look at bachus results a few pages before, he had 12min 59s with 3600MHz!? U think the strap is that important for 32M, that i can not even hit this time with + 4000MHz? :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by funkflix

U think the strap is that important for 32M, that i can not even hit this time with + 4000MHz? :(

---

This is what i get at 3800 untweaked OS. Booted at 400 and CG up to 423. Same board/bios your using. Stil very slow though compared to the 13 min at 3.6 :D

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...M400-422CG.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by loc.o

This is what i get at 3800 untweaked OS. Booted at 400 and CG up to 423. Same board/bios your using. Stil very slow though compared to the 13 min at 3.6 :D

---

Thx for doing this run man! I will test it with the same settings u used.. we will see. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by funkflix

I'm not the guy who is creating new threads all the time. It's even more realistic to get fast and good help into here. ;)

Anyway, thx or ur answer, but look at bachus results a few pages before, he had 12min 59s with 3600MHz!? U think the strap is that important for 32M, that i can not even hit this time with + 4000MHz? :(

---

BA was on the FAST strap 1066 ;)

I'm getting 15min 07sec if i boot with 399MHz and go to 423MHz into win, as loc.o did.. Should be the 1066 Strap too? I think it is my B5 or the 2x512MB holding me back, dunno..