Just tried 1013.006. This is the first BIOS after 1010.003 that sets 1T Command Rate for me :) .. great BIOS so far, however it still uses the same outdated VIA SATA 2.01. I wonder when will ASUS update it ...
Printable View
Just tried 1013.006. This is the first BIOS after 1010.003 that sets 1T Command Rate for me :) .. great BIOS so far, however it still uses the same outdated VIA SATA 2.01. I wonder when will ASUS update it ...
I am using bios 1011. The latest beta bios will fix the 2t command? I wish Asus would release a final version of the 1013 bios soon
The BIOS 1011 does not work OK. The 1T command seems to be disabled.Quote:
Originally Posted by kite7
Use either 1010.003 or the latest 1013.006.
1013.007 is out. I'll give it a try tonight.
Where did you get this one?Quote:
Originally Posted by scorp
1012 is the latest official bios, using it now but see no changes. The memory dividers are still messed up.
1012 doesn't fix the 1T problem .. all versions of 1011 and 1012 won't enable 1T Command Rate from BIOS .. at least not with any of the memory modules I have tried. Couldn't find anything new in 1013.007, but it's stable and it works quite well.
is this thread still alive?
just bought an a8v deluxe rev 2.xx some time now..
paired with a 3000+ winnie..
512mb value ram
and 9550xt..
help me on these..
So what do you need hel for ? You didn't mention any problems in your post :)
owww..sorry..
max FSB for this thing?
and wen wil u know dat lack of voltage(or too much of it) is causing stability problems?
in my BIOS(1011.xx.xxx.xx), since my 512mb geil VR sucks, went for dividers..
went for 4:3, that is, fsb = 266 and dat shud have ram frequency of approximately 200mhz.. but what i get as i view cpuz is fsb = 266 and ram frequency = 177.333..
and dat goes for 3:2 ratio too --> displays 5:4
how am i going to fix this? new BIOS version?
thanks
kj
As far as I know, 1011 and 1012bios do not fix the memory divider
nothing new? how about the dividers?Quote:
Couldn't find anything new in 1013.007, but it's stable and it works quite well.
and what memory modules does this board compatible with or would gain the best OC?
thanks
kjâ„¢
I never used dividers for my OCs from BIOS 1010.003 :) ... so i'm not sure if they fixed them. The best results on this MB were obtained with OCZ Platinum Rev.2 (the TCCD ones, not the newer TCC5 ones). With my Geil UTT I have managed to reach 235 MHz 1:1, but I couldn't go higher beucase of the low memory voltage ... and yeah : teh DDR Bosster on this MB doesn't always work (in my case it goes up to 2.7v after which it locks the MB). Most people ussually get stuck ~260 - 265 MHz and regardless of what they do they can't go higher.
I've been stuck at exactly 260Mhz FSB with the LDT multi set to 3. The other day I changed the LDT multi to 4 and I was able to up the FSB to 270MHz. I haven't had time to test for stability for any extended period of time but I was able to Prime for like 40 min. when at other times at 270 I would error out like in 4 to 5 seconds or BSOD. You would think that running at 4*270=1080HT would be worse but it seems for now to run better for me at a higher HT. Anyone else notice this behavior?
I tried 280MHz FSB but that BSOD very quickly. Also, I was using Clockgen to change the FSB from windows so I haven't tried booting with the 270FSB setting yet.
@scorp
thanks for the input
is this ultra x? or VR?Quote:
With my Geil UTT I have managed to reach 235 MHz 1:1, but I couldn't go higher beucase of the low memory voltage
ang what timings do they run?
i got a 512m geil VR @ 220mhz 2.5 3 3 6 any tighter and it wont boot
i also got winnie 3000 275 x 8 = 2.2GHZ(default Vcore=1.45V) 5:4
got 287 as highest fsb(287 x 5) havent stress tested
VR, but they have UTT BH5 chips.
thats nice..able to hit 235 with ur 2 VRs..
one VR 220 is max for me..221 unstable.. :(
how did this happen?Quote:
You would think that running at 4*270=1080HT would be worse but it seems for now to run better for me at a higher HT
i tot to run it this value
FSB x LDT x 2
shud be less than this value
200(default fsb) x LDT x 2 ???
I just forgot to add the extra 2 multiplier. Your correct it should be 270*4*2=2160. What I mean by worse is from a stability point a view since 2160 is greater then 2000 which is what the board is advertised to run at.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjâ„¢
I always had better results if i leave the HTT at 5 all the time. The BIOS adjust it automatically when necessary since BIOS 8 or 9 I think.Quote:
Originally Posted by mxa
u mean i can leave the LDT multi at 5 den BIOS will just change that if necessary?Quote:
I always had better results if i leave the HTT at 5 all the time. The BIOS adjust it automatically when necessary since BIOS 8 or 9 I think.
mine wont boot at all..so i have to manually adjust it to 3
(275x3x2 which is less dan 200x5x2)
1009 auto-adjusted 5x to 4x if you set the FSB at more than 220 MHz. But from 1010 upwards if you set 5x it really stays at 5x :D ... got to 2300 HT with no problems, althrough that didn't gave me any performance boost (not that I would have expected one) :)
@scorp
howd u get 2.0 and 1T?Quote:
2 x 512 MB Geil Value PC3200 (2.0-3-2-5-1T)
i got 1013.007 BETA and 1 x 512 MB GeiL VR (2.5-3-3-6 2T)
if i tighten it more, wont boot and have to clear cmos.
any special settings?