I really hope that AMD doesn't wait 3 months to release 9950 or whatever they're going to call the cut down Hawaii.
What is the rumored release date at this point?
Printable View
I really hope that AMD doesn't wait 3 months to release 9950 or whatever they're going to call the cut down Hawaii.
What is the rumored release date at this point?
maybeQuote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
http://wccftech.com/amd-hawaii-r9290...z-clock-speed/
Attachment 131328Quote:
Originally Posted by BababooeyHTJ
HmmmmQuote:
Originally Posted by flopper
http://translate.google.com/translat...%2F539&act=url
Great if true. Nvidia's been charging too much for their chips lately and simply releasing their cards too slowly.Quote:
Originally Posted by m_jones_
Faster than Titan, and more energy efficient. This leak looks legit.
http://udteam.tistory.com/539
With those numbers,if this thing comes in at under $600 then its a clear win for AMD.:up:
Will be an extremely nice early Christmas present if they are able to pull it off.Quote:
Originally Posted by hurleybird
If its under $600 i'll pick one up.Quote:
Originally Posted by xray
At $700 it might take me some convincing...
if its 500 im buying two lol
Any pics of under the hood look at the heatsink yet?
Can't wait to see a dual Hawaii card ;-)
these results are with oced second bios, on default it is below titan, but still great performance.
PS. it seem all my info here was true, my source was great this time, 512-bus, 2560-2816 SPs for gaming SKU, Titans performance :)
Attachment 131329
Sure it is 2560 SP?
it is info from leaker, but still can be 2816 for sure
Where, I don't see it.
If it really does have a 512 bit memory bus, insane, though I wonder how much its going to cost, and I would prefer to see a 8GB version if this is going to beat a Titan.
Hawaii is 44/176/44 (SIMD, TMU, ROP).
4 CUs with 11 SIMDs & ROPs each.
== "Mighty 44" ;)
by the same source, will cost 650 USD
Stilt: You was wrong with die size, maybe you are wrong with this too :)
Why 44Rops ? 48 seems more plausible as whatever they do they have it decoupled from the crossbar. ( 32bits for each IC ) Or it have completely change from Tahiti.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Stilt
44x 64 = 2816 SP ..
So if it is decoupled, why would 48 be more plausible? Since those two values are independent from each other, it can be anything. 40, 44, 48, 64...
The block diagram shows 44, thats why :D
So were you (470-480 sqr mm).Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
I just scaled two very different sized BDs against each other in Photoshop.
by few sites, measured gpu from leaked Picture is aroun 420mm2, by the few days old interview, it is too around 420mm2
great to see things materialise as rumoured, soo soon.