60% faster than the 680...yikes.
Does someone have a direct link for this image from pconline?
Printable View
60% faster than the 680...yikes.
Does someone have a direct link for this image from pconline?
;)Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
http://diy.pconline.com.cn/317/3177824.html
Thx. But googlish translation of the text below the picture says that it's just a prognosis.
Whats with the range? This one seems as a more likely possibly score.
so finally this graph becomes true :)
http://i1-news.softpedia-static.com/...es-Surface.png
"Of course, Echigo-listed graphics applications run points on 3DMark such will have different "optimization," We expect the GTX Titan 3DMark 11 run points will go to the 5300."
is not a real result, but estimate.
Your image was blocked. Thanks for the link.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
It better beat the 680 by at least 40% since it is 1.87x bigger chip.
More CCs in the GK11x's with exactly the same die sizes? I don't think so?.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrea deluxe
Come on. For $899 we must stick to high expectations guys !!! It doesn't make sense to settle for "realistic" figures. I sure have HIGH expectation in terms of 100% better than GTX 680 for this $900 TITAN. Let them disappointing me, its expensive so it should not disappoint. For this money you get GTX 690, obviously has to be around that performance - anything lower is a disappointment.
ps: To be more precise, this is exactly what im expecting:
http://boxofficebuz.com/content/news...news_full.jpeg
I want SAVAGE performance !!!
Because you think peoples on Nvidia will have do a benchmark slide knowing the card will have never been released ... because GK 100 is not the GK110 ( or Nvidia have change his way of working and releasing x110 chips before x100 ))Quote:
Originally Posted by kromosto
i really don't understand what you are saying :) good or bad or neutral :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Lanek
You know me it is allways neutral .Quote:
Originally Posted by kromosto
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/9ec46ac...7a771b6556.jpg
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/203...e_GTX_880.html
Added yesterday on TPU
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/
Interesting database. Thanks TPU ! :up:
So it's the next node, it about the same size and only 1,500m transistor gain?Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
They have GTX780, Titan and GTX880 with release dates there, lol. I think that can be considered trolling. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
That's interesting, there are GTX 7xx listings too. :confused: Wonder if it's just put there for fun or if it's accidentally posted?Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
Could be trolling as zalbard guessed.... late in the year radeon models listed as well.
NVIDIA GT 700 Series Kepler 28nm/ Release: 1Q/2Q 2013
NVIDIA GT 800 Series Maxwell 20nm/ Release: ?Q 2014
It's easy:up:
That's the GTX 900...Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
Seriously now, Maxwell GPU, with the K20X specs ? Really bad trolling attempt tell 'em.
GEFORCE Titan picture fake!
http://www.arabpcworld.com/images/20...CB-APCW-01.jpg
http://www.arabpcworld.com/images/20...Titan-FACK.jpg
translate.google
http://www.arabpcworld.com/?p=26291Quote:
We had all seen late last week the first picture was about it for the PCB your card GEFORCE Titan where the site, which put the first picture exclusively work crystallized be full and the outlets of the card until even the remaining vision is clear contents, consisting of PCB and the focus was on image the GPU and left a clear and written GK110!
If the audit and the opening image of the PAL GPU find Dear reader that the word GK110 modified manually professionally severe but which revealed it is the site of videocardz when easing crystal on the image became clear milestones the PCB a little and was sudden that's modified fully is the basis of image for PCB card GTX285 has been edited Alfaz Bauer added 3 won in return for only 6 MOSFET circuits instead of 9 in addition to the type of the traditional Amoosvi on the PCB and that you did not use NVIDIA a long time ago! In addition sockets 6 +8 instead of 6 +6! In addition to reducing the number of segments of the existing Memory and modify them with the lifting of the metal cover PAL Ocean GPU.
Not forget planning PAL Ocean GPU decree white is Mtzabak them completely with GTX285 in addition to slot 2Pin next to power outlets.
Department of Energy are quite similar in terms of the number and distribution of Alkpastorz especially Alkpastor next to the ports of DVI Port, which was concealed in this way so as not found out is the PCB.
This must be noted that these fake or Fake
K20X doesn't have 2880/240/64 512-bit bus and Maxwell may also include project Denver CPUs.Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner
All I know is that TPU has GeForce Titan ("780Ti" term edited 2 days ago, identical specs) since months and, finally, they are maybe right. We will know soon. :yepp:
I'm not that fluent in googlish, could someone please paraphrase what they're saying?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
all I want to say that the picture of (GEFORCE Titan) which was published a week ago is a fake one, as you can see above the similarity with the GTX285 picture is obvious.Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
I think if someone wrote on a cake GTX780 some of you will believe it....
What !?, where is this cake you speak of?Quote:
Originally Posted by kuroikenshi
How many candles does it have?