This man put another picture and says that GTX 680 performance is strong
http://diybbs.zol.com.cn/56/231_558125_50.html
http://www.abload.de/img/11gtx680405l1.jpg
What do you think is fake or Real?:confused:
Printable View
This man put another picture and says that GTX 680 performance is strong
http://diybbs.zol.com.cn/56/231_558125_50.html
http://www.abload.de/img/11gtx680405l1.jpg
What do you think is fake or Real?:confused:
From the VR-Zone article :
Seems like Dil-tech was in the right direction.Quote:
GK104 or GTX 660 will most likely end up competing with AMD's Radeon HD 7970
Now Charlie's comment makes complete sense too. If 660 beats 7970 then how fast will the flagship be?!!
Tick tock business blowing my mind. G80 all over again surely?
Fake. Has already been exposed as such.
VRzone cite Fudzilla, Inpai cite Fudzilla, guru3D cite "i dont know", but call G104 the GTX680 and release date in february ... Inpai dont give any date and cite fudzilla as source, Softpedia cite Inpai, but give a date... Guru3D say February, Fudzilla Q2 ( April ), add then other forums take the 3 and make a compil with old, new infos .. huum .... outside charlie words, this look to turn in loop .. I was think Inpai is the initial source, but it is not..Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim
Even in Chipell, nothing new. The joy of Internet ...
You forgot EXPreview (PHK?), this site was the first to talk about 2GB/256-bit week ago, and a non-Q1 Kepler launch since many weeks.
source???Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
some pages ago, you should find the same screenshots.Quote:
Originally Posted by clo007
I really do hope Nvidia will bring a fast and small chip that could compete with 7970. That could very well force a price war. I still doubt though that a 2GB 256-bit Kepler will perform the same as a 3GB 384-bit GCN, even though Kepler probaly is more mature as an architecture. But even if it came close it would be great. At the moment though I don't think we'll see it before april, and some people are saying june, and I guess the big chip before the end of the year.
OBR trash talking AMD?
Wake me up when there's coffee...
What i like is some days ago, it do a big post on his blog, saying: " dont believe what other write, kepler will be out in february.." now its is April in this post .... seriously..Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimitriman
Maybe he is right, but i start to think infos are seriously given for marketing right now.
GPU-Z GTX 680
http://h8.abload.de/img/gtx680gpu-za54qo.jpg
I do not see that this picture is fake
GTX 680
http://h8.abload.de/img/gtx68017q223.jpg
http://diybbs.zol.com.cn/56/231_558125_50.html
Of course it's fake, GPU-Z doesn't have the new cards in its database yet.
And you see that the version of Gpu-z is blurred to?
May be it a version not available yet?
I wouldn't rush to say it's fake yet.
Although 1024SP sounds to good to be true.
it's fake we are in 4th week of 2012 and manufacture date is written on gpu shows it's 28th week.. pls dont bring anything here from this kid..
That GPU-Z picture looks fake, even if it was real, I hope NVIDIA does not use 2GB on a 512 bit memory bus, looks like NVIDIA did not learn with lower VRAM on the GTX 580.
Learned what? The difference between 1.5GB and 3GB was negligible. Not to mention, they just upped it by 512MB...
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/a2f56c4...fce6c28e95.jpg
Hi, I work closely with the developer of GPU-Z, and I can confirm that screenshot is fake.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
BF3 with bells and whistles on takes 1400mb on Video ram on my card. So 1.5gb is barely enought for current new games. If u buy a card for 2 years and have decent monitor to connect to, then 2GB is pure minimum.
What games are we talking about exactly?
Name one DX11 title, that is supposed to come close to the BF3 custom PC platform stuff, because I can't think of any. MS nor Sony are even close to launching (not just unveiling) their next gen console, so you don't really have to worry about that too. And when they do, I don't think this generation of cards will be fast enough to handle them at max. settings, so again, no real issue here.
I think 2GB should be also the bare minimum for midrange/highend cards today. It's enough but only just, 3GB is already overkill today but might be very useful in 2 years. I'd really need a VRAM upgrade, 1GB isn't cutting it anymore despite I'm a 1680x1050 res user, especially in Skyrim with texture mods! :P But yea I'd be perfectly OK with a new card being released with 2GB today if price is right.
The issue I see is that if NV's "mid range" Kepler part can compete with the HD 7970, then the high end Keplers will be so expensive, no one will be able to afford them. I mean imagine what the market would have looked like if the GTX 560 Ti competed on a level footing with the HD 6970 and was priced accordingly. Yikes!
One of the two would start a price war for sure. I don't expect more than 600$ for the top dog. What good does a card do that no one will buy?
They've had higher prices in the past. Then again if Nvidia's big chip comes late 2012 prices have probably fallen already, especially if GK104 and 7970 compete in price and performance. Though I don't see either one wanting a price war in that case. Nvidia wants a premium and AMD wouldn't want to drop prices if it had a more expensive card.
8800 Ultra was +$830 at launch