http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/10a...20be09c0e1.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Tenkura
Don't know if it's a fake or not :shrug:
Printable View
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/10a...20be09c0e1.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Tenkura
Don't know if it's a fake or not :shrug:
Link is not working.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenkura
Probably a repost http://www.asrock.com/news/events/2011AM3+/
Here you go:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunfire
http://pic2.178.com/64/641528/month_...1a9dc57455.jpg
Only one core and one thread, what's up with that? Very fishy if you ask me...Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
Id imagine cpuz is going to need to be tweaked to identify cores in the new modular setup AMD has going.Quote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
:DQuote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
Don't know if it's legit or not, maybe Franck D. knows something :shrug:
I say it is, as far as I know only modules could be enabled/disabled, and with a module being two cores your core count will be an even number - not one. On the other hand, take note that the CPU selection box is available meaning there are multiple CPUs installed - that fits in with the 16GB RAM (server, a home user doesn't really need 16GB) so maye CPU-Z can't detect core count?Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
If we don't know how this CPU-Z version interprets a BD, we can't tell if it's fake or not. We can keep on guessing but it won't lead us nowhere.
This is essentially a rumour thread ;)
Of course, but a version of CPU-Z that doesn't support BD won't make any rumours, only confusion.Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] Oj101
You can't interpret the info in a good way if the info is all wrong from the beginning, especially when it's about the first CPU with modules.
If it was just a dumb shrink of a X6 then CPU-Z probably have made less errors, just like in the past when the first K8 on a new process showed up, for instance.
Seems CPU-Z doesn't work properly with BD :
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/0ec...d3fa5d6775.jpg
edit : source Pcinlife
lol ASRock portraying 1960's Mini Cooper for AM3 and some kind of ferrari render as AM3+Quote:
Originally Posted by slaveondope
http://we.pcinlife.com/forum-redirec...-30924734.htmlQuote:
Next week to release R11.5 scores
Flank3r must be happy :D
Still not convinced, no other ES has ever shown that way.
hehe, right, Im happy, but its hard show todays news at mobile internet EDGE conection :-D (this weekend Im off my normal net conection)
btw, where is Cinebenxh score :-D?
Llano's ES shows 4 processors, each having 1 core on CPU-Z :DQuote:
Originally Posted by [XC] Oj101
If the guy shows the processor submenu, there's probably going to be 6 processors.
I fell off my chair laughing at that too mate: :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
ROFL @ AsRock
1)- The sockets black - OMG! - The pin holes are larger too LOL!
2)- Since when did the power link need speed? Can tweak that on my CH4 (supports better power management - first thing an OC'er switches off )
3)- Environmentally friendly?! Errr ok
4)- Less CPU noise? - Errrr ok too (Ain't that what LLC etc is for?)
5)- Higher current support? - (Sure my CH IV can beat that )
6)- New Bracket makes the CPU cooler!!!!! - anything you say ASRock
Sick stunt by asrock - Allot of maybe's and the rest is rubbish which any overclocker would switch off. Just because they're AM3 boards 'may not' support the other one decent mentioned feature doesn't mean that others can't.
UEFI - Now that's interesting! - If it supports BIOS boot in less than 2 secs
Please do correct me if i'm wrong on any of this! :up:
I was talking about the CPU ID string :)Quote:
Originally Posted by blindbox
That's whatever AMD programs in. It's probably specific to an internal code that AMD uses for testing, ie which line it was produced on at a certain wing of a factory, date, time week, revision etc. It might even be a type of "watermark" that identifies the CPUs owner during testing. Which may or may not be used to pinpoint folks who break NDA's etcQuote:
Originally Posted by [XC] Oj101
My responses above :)Quote:
Originally Posted by zoomee
Not quite. The similarity is that both affect the waveform of the current, but that's it really. Remember that noise is a harsh, unwanted waveform in sound? The top is ripple, the bottom noise:Quote:
4)- Less CPU noise? - Errrr ok too (Ain't that what LLC etc is for?)
They are talking about power ripple, cleaner power...noise is sort of another term for ripple though they are two separate things...why does that matter if you already have a PSU like Seasonic that is clean already? Beats me.
http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...oiseripple.png
Sorry it's not very neat, I did it in mspaint quickly. As for why you want a board to deliver clean power, well what's the use of a clean input to the PWMs if the output is dirty? A clean input is good for your board, a clean output is good for your CPU.
I just find it odd that it's different to the other ES AMD chips I have. COMPLETELY different:shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawkeye4077
correct :up: Im waiting for Cross V F :)Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] Oj101