I didn't mention the GT 1600mhz C7 cause that's not hypers, probably BBSE...
only 1600 C6 and 2000 C7 (both, very rare)
Printable View
Corsair gt's? I believe their hypers mate..
Old C7: http://nx.i4memory.com/reviewimages/...000C7GT_17.jpg
New C7: http://www.overclockers.com/forums/a...5&d=1264480432
Rev 2.1 = Hyper
And what about this one?
http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?name=...nel-Memory-kit
2133 C8 should be hyper also?
No those are going to be hypers too. I have a set of Dom 1866 C9 V2.2 that I am 99% sure that are BBSE that will do 7-8-7-21 on *some* i7's at 2000mhz if their IMC's are just retarded strong on a single stage. The efficiency falls off a cliff after about 975mhz though. This is without B2B of course and at 1.74vdimm
Should be Hyper with just a lower bin than the 2200 C8's :up:
Shoot man all of those super talent kits are cheap vs Corsair's offerings. Hell you can get 6GB of super talents for the same price as 4GB of the Adata 2200C8's on newegg :down:
I am not sure that Corsair bin the Hyper better- I am very satisfied with my STT, the 2200 C8 as well as the 2000 C7 Project X- they are way beyond the specs Memtest86 stable and if I hadnīt problems with IMC/Board Combi which only allows me to test 32M with straigt timings to 1150 ca. I would have reached more than 1140 C8-8-8-24 at 1,66V
Well, i havenīt ripped off the Heatspreaders, and got the 2000 C7 yesterday- having started testing today at 35°Celsius in germany my first impressions are the 2000 C7 are better- need lower Voltage for same timings- Memtest stable at 1170 C9-9-9-24 1T at 1,66V on an GA-UD5 with an i860, and at least 1200 with same Timings and V 1M- not more tested yet, on C8 they do better as well
Yes, mine(the C7) have black PCB- but I donīt think you made a mistake, the 2200 C8 are wonderful Rams:up:
Yes, the dual channel kit 2200 I bought look like the ones in the start post with black PCB and HS- as I went for the 2000 C7 I also bought a single 2200Cl8 as backup- interestingly this one has a green PCB^^