Printable View
03 has low scores bug only,anybody helps to solve a problem for me please..
http://www.vmodtech.com/spaw/images/...RS/01n-547.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/spaw/images/...RS/03n-547.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/spaw/images/...RS/05n-547.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/spaw/images/...RS/06n-547.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/spaw/images/...RS/aqn-547.png
would if i screwed it up when i ran ccleaner and messed up .net framework http://i4memory.com/showthread.php?t=9976 ?Quote:
Originally Posted by loc.o
in cat 8.9 official out of the box, cat ai was set to disabled - maybe that's why ?Quote:
Originally Posted by ahmad
monitoring via everest ultimate 4.60.1509 beta with OSD display enabled :)
probably time to do fresh os installs hehe
No catalyst ai = bad. Don't resort to such maddness.. yet.
I thought the 8.9 betas were the ones shipped with the x2, if you say its final, thats final.
well installed vista ultimate sp1 64bit with AI advanced trying lower cpu clock but higher gpu clock @860/900
http://fileshosts.com/intel/DFI/DFI_..._900_92170.png
eva>
your score is low still :(
at 850/950 or so 100k should be doable at 4800mhz just pull up 2 4870's in cfire from the old days
seems the diff between a good scard and bad is 6k and the diff on cfx is about 10k
you should look for 8xx+/650+ gt2/3 at those clocks :up:
thanks CCC read your post at http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=261 and see what you mean..
pain in the back side.. looks like more work is needed :)
maaaaaaan i was benching my ass off for the last couple of days and got some decent scores yesterday with EP45T Extreme and dual 4870X2s
uploaded the results someone else uploaded theirs the same day >> our systems were very similar with my card clocks a bit higher but the other guy had 50MHz on me on CPU
however our GT2s were VERY different.........mine was 1308FPS >> his 1436FPS
i also took a hit of 10% on GT3
wtf?? am i missing some tweaks or could my runs be bugged or his runs....what's going on here :(
:shrug:
full comparison
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/4012/28736291dm8.jpg
besides that joecool has similar numbers as well and similar clocks again yet i get killed in GT2 and GT3
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/6061/48886659ig8.jpg
lol here's another one from spl >> 5500MHz on CPU and these scores EEEEEEEEEEEK
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/2646/77610642vh9.jpg
i'm not accusing anyone of anything just trying to improve my scores if possible :shrug:
maybe dual 8x PCI Express has something to do with it but then again isn't 160K for 6GHz a bit high :confused: considering the W.R. is at much higher CPU clocks and this bench loves horsepower :shrug:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
"ONLY" few people can do very high GT2. They believe our score are all bug "low' and their scores are real score.:ROTF:
how do we unbug them :D
i used dual PSUs >> HX1000 and HX620 and highest power usage i saw last night with everything on the plug including my laptop and pedestal fan was around 1000W draw
i've got Vista SP1 and latest beta 8.9 driver
did the 85Hz trick and some other stuff heh but ~151K was about limit and system was crying for higher clocks however my board would not give me anything over 600Mhz FSB
i need a board that can do 650Mhz FSB so that i can give gautam and andre a hard time with my "low" bug scores hahahah
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Maybe you need to copy Vista "CD' from these real score guys.:D
lolQuote:
Originally Posted by AndreYang
i have a really lite Vista
tweaked it out and the install disk fits on a CD :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Is it time to hand pick Vista and LCDs?:ROTF:
my first card a sapphire ran perfect on vista and xp all way up to 900's on water cooling and the scores where great gt2/3 I then moved to
other brand cards and the same install and I couldnt replicate the scores gt2/3 low everytime
If its something to do with some cards or the way the drivers are seeing these cards who knows, but as soon as I installed the sapphire
I sold 'i borrowed it back just for giggles' and put in the same rig same os that the other brand cards ran on the scores went back to normal
easy to see what gt2/3 should be is run 4870 in cfire then match that 03 single card you will see 90% of guys with 4870x2 cant even
do/match single card so when you see two cards tring to match and see the guys that get it to work you see these massive scores
160-170k should be doable bar none the reason only a few can make 1 card now or the few that get two cards to run right is beyond me
most of us know how to install an OS and whats worse is you might like me have had a single card being fine and now that wont even run
right so you cant worry about cfx as 1 card is not even performing right :(
so you tell me whats going on?
as I have no idea, lol :rofl:
or... attach an LCD or CRT to the second display? ;)
Run a CRT.. at 640x480 250hz :D
i had different brand of cards in my setup
hipro will pawn us all with his 320Hz CRT with cigarette bud marks :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by STEvil
looking for gem 4870x2 bioses for flashing then huh ??Quote:
Originally Posted by CCC
maybe low GT2/3 is due to only 1/2 the GPU usage during part of the test ?
http://fileshosts.com/intel/DFI/DFI_...sts_543fps.png
Well, i seem to have caught the "bug" even though all i did was unlug and plug in my cards a few times.
Same exact cards.
WIll have to test to see if its the Asus TOP bios causing it ;)
Have you guys read the entire thread?
- The GT2/GT3 bug is not OS related, as it happens on XP as well
- The bug is not raw MHz power related as I had the bug at speeds < 4G
- The bug is not due to 50% gpu usage, here I have that 50% gpu usage in both bugged and unbugged runs
There is no real solution to this problem yet.
we're grasping at straws right now :D
It's the other way around: you lost the bug by unplugging the graphics card. If you disconnect your system, or parts from your system, from the power circuit, you lose the bug. The only way to retrieve the bug is by luck.Quote:
Originally Posted by T_M
Did the same thing with my RAM kit: unplug, lost boost ... after a while I got the boost back.
The main issue is that we cannot detect the boost other than with the 3DMark03 application. We need to find an external application that detects the problem as well and then we can move on.Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
RAM kit
boost
what are you talking about :confused:
"After that, I tried to go up in FSB, but seemed to be limited by my TG ram, switched to OCZ PC9200's, did a CMOS reset and tried at 430FSB. Surprisingly, the bug was gone, my results were low 80k's. All tests in the 405-420 bug range turned out to be non-bugged with the OCZ's (data is not in graph, I can give you the data if you want).Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Thus, I switched back to my TG's and switched cpu cooling. Now I was able to run 430+ FSB as apparently I was not limited by the memory, but limited by cpu temperature. The test data you can find in the graph; don't worry, I re-ran most of the FSB settings and turned out that NONE of the previous settings were giving me a boost!"
= 'bugged high' (~Gautam's request to not call the runs bugged)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
lol Gautam you trouble maker hahah
i see
that is odd heh
sounds similar to the asus p5b dx/commando PCI-E x1 link bug when i found certain FSB fixed the x1 link bug, but only after cmos clear :)Quote:
Originally Posted by massman