Crysis optimised for Quad +
5100 chipset FTW: low power dualie sounds good to me!!!
Maybe I wont wait for Nehalem dualie...
pretty little pictures: http://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/45nm/photos.htm :)
Printable View
Crysis optimised for Quad +
5100 chipset FTW: low power dualie sounds good to me!!!
Maybe I wont wait for Nehalem dualie...
pretty little pictures: http://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/45nm/photos.htm :)
E8400, I'm waiting
He, he, he...
I see Supermicro has no 16X PCI-E offering on 5100 chipset not yet anyway, but theyare ATX sized!
http://www.supermicro.com/products/m...oard/Xeon1333/
Tempest i5100X (S5375) DDR2! Looks like ATX :)
http://www.tyan.com/product_board.aspx
Why not get a SkullTrail board? It's got better socket placement :)
You buy their books and you send them to school and what happens? Nothing!Quote:
Originally Posted by XS Janus
You looked in the wrong place my friend..:D
http://www.supermicro.com/products/m...00/X7DWA-N.cfm
Now, what was that about no PCI-eX16 slots? Will TWO of them take care of your needs?:p:
:D :D
yea I noticed that little baby, but what I meant there is still no regular ATX and ddr2 version using the 5100 chipset. :( (power in a small package :D)
Do you know if the 5100 chipset uses regular DDR2 or just ECC one?
Looks to me only ECC :(
Only ECC.
The Tyan boards look tempting! Even the FBDIMM one.
Intel needs a server bord with several PCI-e, current offering (Tyan i5000XT/i5400XT only) sucks.
It seems there is a big box for the QX9650 and a smaller one...:cool: :shrug:
Link XFastest(a nice review featuring P5E3 Deluxe) for the bigger.
Nice cooler, I see they made good on that thing.
Anybody got a detailed pricelist of all the server chips anounced?
All the articles <i found have got only the low-end and top offering prices...
1k price? If it is what you look for:Quote:
Originally Posted by XS Janus
Quote:
Xeon X5482 (4 core) - 3,2 GHz - 12 Mo - 1,6 GHz - 1279$
Xeon E5472 (4 core) - 3 GHz - 12 Mo - 1,6 GHz - 1022$
Xeon X5472 (4 core) - 3 GHz - 12 Mo - 1,6 GHz - 958$
Xeon E5462 (4 core) - 2,8 GHz - 12 Mo - 1,6 GHz - 797$
Xeon X5460 (4 core) - 3,16 GHz - 12 Mo - 1,33 GHz - 1172$
Xeon E5450 (4 core) - 3 GHz - 12 Mo - 1,33 GHz - 915$
Xeon X5450 (4 core) - 3 GHz - 12 Mo - 1,33 GHz - 851$
Xeon E5440 (4 core) - 2,83 GHz - 12 Mo - 1,33 GHz - 690$
Xeon E5430 (4 core) - 2,66 GHz - 12 Mo - 1,33 GHz - 455$
Xeon E5420 (4 core) - 2,5 GHz - 12 Mo - 1,33 GHz - 316$
Xeon E5410 (4 core) - 2,33 GHz - 12 Mo - 1,33 GHz - 256$
Xeon E5405 (4 core) - 2 GHz - 12 Mo - 1,33 GHz - 209$
Xeon X5272 (2 core) - 3,4 GHz - 6 Mo - 1,6 GHz - 1172$
Xeon X5260 (2 core) - 3,33 GHz -6 Mo - 1,33 GHz - 851$
Xeon E5205 (2 core) - 1,86 GHz - 6 Mo - 1,066 GHz - 177$
so do IQuote:
Originally Posted by sonicsallen
hope these will oc @ 4.2+ wc
12mb across the 4cores... that explains the 316$ price for 2,5 GHz model.
Q9450 has 2.66GHz for the same price.
Not much of a premium... i like it!
You cant directly compare the 2.Quote:
Originally Posted by XS Janus
The 5000 series xeon also works in dual socket. You would have to compare 3000 series Xeons with your desktop part.
I know, you are right, but thats what I meant by small premium when you even get 12mb cache :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Shintai
when is e8400 coming out?
http://aztekcomputers.com/detail.php.../BX80570E8400A
I called and they have no eta
http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20071116PD208.htmlQuote:
Intel to add one more 45nm CPU to E8000 family
Intel will add one more 45nm desktop processor to its E8000 family in January 2008, according to sources at motherboard makers.
In addition to the E8200, E8400 and E8500 processors of the E8000 family, Intel plans to launch the E8190. The CPU will have a frequency of 2.66GHz, L2 cache of 6MB, and FSB of 1333MHz. It will be priced at US$163 in 1000-unit quantities.
Although E8190's specification is similar to that of the E8200, the CPU does not support virtualization or Trust Execution Technology, and will only focus on the OEM market where it will be slightly cheaper when purchased in large volumes, added the sources.
Intel is also planning to launch the Core 2 Duo E5000 family to replace the previous E4000 family in the entry-level market. The first product from the E5000 family will launch in April next year priced at US$133 in 1000-unit quantities. Specifications are still unknown.
I'll probably just hit up the 8200 and run 8x533...4.26Ghz.
Which will replace my 6300 running at 6x533.
Hopefully the new 3870x2 is less than 400 and I'll have myself a system.
are you really stable @ 533fsb manQuote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy
The lower multi the further I can go FSB wise at least on my setup too and then I'm thinking of when CPU frequency limit isn't the issue. And he's running with 6x multi. I never tried going past 515x6 on my setup but it got there Orthos stable on stock volts for mobo and cpu. but on 7x it does only 500~503 FSB (3.5~3.52GHz) stable although mobo volts are increased and cpu is increased a lot as well and at 8x it does 469x8 (3.75GHz) stable and that's when CPU starts limiting based on how it reacts to cpu voltage increase. I was really expecting, cool now I can run 515x7 on my setup after have tested how far it goes on 8x multi and then testing how far "mobo" can go at 6x multi but then got dissapointed that it only allows for 500~503 fsb stable at 7x multi. So it didn't turn out how I wanted.
So there's a high possibility the mobo won't let him go as far on 8x multi as 6x, at least on my setup, FSB wall comes a bit earlier with every higher multi I go with. Getting above 500~510 x8 stable I don't think will be common even for a nicely clocking dual core on aircooling, therefore E8400 is highly interesting due to 9x multi and still good price tag.
Source: http://www.tbreak.com/reviews/articl...7&pagenumber=1Quote:
Today, we take a look at the lower end of the Penryn family- the E6450 running at 1333MHz FSB with a multiplier of 7x to yeild 2.33GHz. While we dont have the exact pricing on this part, we expect it to retail around the US$140 mark.
Basically, all we're doing in this article is comparing the E6450 to the E6550 which is esentially the same CPU with the older Conroe core- so its 2.33GHz (7 x 1333) with 4MB shared L2 cache and based on the 65nm process. Lets kick things off by introducing the testbed.
Benchmarks
E6450 (Penryn) Vs. E6550 (Conroe)
Synthetic/Games/Apps
http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/238/appgf3.th.jpg http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/3115/gamesgt8.th.jpg http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/6...2zy3nu8.th.jpg
Conclusion/OC
Our particular CPU overclocked nicely but certainly didn’t set any records. On air, we managed to touch a bit north of 3GHz at 1.5V. Upping the voltage any further resulted in the system not booting up. Also, the ASUS Maximus board we used could not detect the temperature of the CPU, however, we’re sure than a BIOS update will fix this once these CPUs are officially available.
Intel has certainly done a pretty good job with the update to the Conroe core. The extra 2MB cache per dual core and other optimizations helped programs like Photoshop perform twenty percent faster, however, that is on the extreme end of things. Generally, expect a 4-6% increase in most applications at the same clock speed. Games on the other hand, don’t show that big of an improvement, averaging about 2% speed gains
yeah, my gal's e2140 hit 2.9 at about 1.4
Ryan
Does anyone knows if the Q9450 or the E8500 are available in China?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MR_SmartAss
The overclockers rule is NEVER jump to conclusions by looking at the results from one or two processors. Small samples of early steppings and etc..... Look at folks waiting on better samples of Phenom for example?Quote:
Our particular CPU overclocked nicely but certainly didn’t set any records.
Point #2. Geesh guys, aren't we being just a little bit Greedy here? How many of us thought we'd have this amount of performance on our Desktops 2 years ago?:D We're talking about "around the US$140 mark" that will kick the crap out of something ($1,000 to $1,100 X2) many thought was a great deal. Sorry but maybe I have low expectations or something.
Let's look at this as if it were video cards? What if company "C", not A-ATI or B-nVidia (no GPU war please) had a $75 GPU that out performed the $579 top cards on the market now with a little overclocking. That fact, even if the top cards were overclocked too. Would we complain then too?
OBTW, I like the new cooler!