Yes, and I can tell you that image is from AMD :)Quote:
Originally Posted by vario
Printable View
Yes, and I can tell you that image is from AMD :)Quote:
Originally Posted by vario
No by nature the Top end chips are usually the highest LN2 clockers. Deneb was sort of an exception 955..Quote:
Originally Posted by techtrancer
Thuban was high bin = high ln2 chip
Bulldozer and newer revisions the best cold ( high leak ) were in the higher bins.
We are seeing same with 1800x....
Wierd thing, 4C/8T 1500X 2+2 and 4C/8T 1400 4+0/0+4.Quote:
Originally Posted by vario
or failed cache.
Oh, that's right. Forgot it could still be a 2+2 with half L3 per CCX. That would remove the probability of a situation where a cheaper 4+0 would be faster than a 2+2 upper model at same clock, even with less L3.
I don't like RyZen 1.0. I'll wait for 2.0. :yawn:
OverWatchQuote:
Originally Posted by StAndrew
1100T @ 1440p
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SJ8FLH7Kqg
I don't see a bottleneck w/1100T and 1080
I don't believe I will bottleneck vega @ multi monitor
+ I can vsr to 7680x2160 and destroy older titles ;)
1800X @ ? W/GTX 1080(1080p)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdVoj6-qinc
Mind you, the "infinity fabric" + L3 cache speed is tied to RAM frequency. So increased memory frequency doesn't only increase memory bandwidth.Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
It probably helps with inter-CCX latency.
I wish it was able to be clocked independently though.
I think there was rumor of that. I doubt it will be for many many bios's down the road though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Apokalipse
On this Anand's article:
Quote:
We have confirmation from AMD that there are no silly games going to be played with Ryzen 5. The six-core parts will be a strict 3+3 combination, while the four-core parts will use 2+2. This will be true across all CPUs, ensuring a consistent performance throughout.
I popped that question in pre briefing. My only concern was 4 core parts.Quote:
Originally Posted by AlleyViper
2+2 for the 4c8t parts... shooting themselves in the foot ?
Thats the thing, you DO get big ass L3 cache in that instance, 8 full megs for any 2 cores, thats a lot.Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner
BUT if scheduler isnt aware of the whole CCX issue, it can go to waste and in some cases even end up slower :-/ .
I wouldn't be surprised if an Athlon model came later with only one CCX on die, 4 cores and probably even less L3 (or none for Sempron).
Athlon models will be probably made from raven ridge with disabled GPU.Quote:
Originally Posted by AlleyViper
While i tend to agree and i think 0+4 would probably perform better.....i must remain impartial so i had to ask if at least to point it out in a review.Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner
My intention however was not to question if "silly games" were being played and just to be able to note what configuration i was reviewing.
Oh, good news for people running old Thermalright coolers like me to soften the upgrade to AM4. There's a new TRUE Universal BTK compatible with the ancient TRUEs, Vx, etc for AM4. Shouldn't end with the same mount pressure as the old ones, but it least it works.
Edit: It might be a mess-up on TR's part. I'll email them to confirm, because it seems to be the previous retaining system that only supports the AM3 holes.
Few speculations: Maybe we will see something better for ultra megatasking than Ryzen 7. I read some ifnormation about monster up to 16C/32T for desktop workstations.
The clockspeed looks great. It beats out my xeon easily.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
Oh yes, its coming :)...
https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-engi...samples-update
I do not see that being very usefull for the majority.
Its a server chip its clocked lower and if current imc/memory issues are any indicator...quad channel is going to be a mess for early adopters.
Its not even the same package so it can not drop into a x370. Good thing with current x370 boards thermals.
Gamers need higher clocks not more cores at this point....but the crunchers and work station guys will benefit greatly.
Platform would be lovely for current cpu's but...not realistic. The gains with pci x etc etc are due to double stacked R7 cores. Thats why quad channel.. Etc etc.
Ryzen 2 literally probably means Ryzen *2
Respin will be more exciting than re glueing.
Threadripper is almost here! HEDT AMD, summer 2017!:eek:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4176/3...0d43edd2_b.jpg
Now bring us the real-life applications ( except rendering, which is already there on core utilization ) and games to use the cores... :D
The civilization series always scaled with cores since civ v ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner