best super pi times?

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-01-2004, 08:02 AM
GoriLLakoS

@Corered....what memory do you have there???and what cooling????
11-01-2004, 08:58 AM
Ice_

cpu > Amd/xp 2280mhz
mobo > Abit nf7-s v2.0
ram > Geil 3200 400mhz 2.5 3 3 6 2.8V (1x512)
vga Card > GF4 Tit 4200
air cooling

my Pi 1M > 48sek :/
11-01-2004, 12:52 PM
CodeRed

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoriLLakoS

@Corered....what memory do you have there???and what cooling????

mem is kingston KHX3200/256 .. pure BH5 :D
cooling is a R507 modded mach I
11-01-2004, 01:48 PM
funkflix

Which Vdimm u need for this results? :)
11-01-2004, 05:13 PM
cpulloverclock

SuperPI unpatched

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/30.gif

Patched
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/28.gif

5100/5080 and 3008/3056 at 200 for the memory bench
11-01-2004, 06:33 PM
CodeRed

Quote:

Originally Posted by GravdiggA

Which Vdimm u need for this results? :)

3.55V for that run

Normally I use 3.6-3.65 but I found with the warmer temps (its going on summer here) that I got better clocks with slightly less voltage.
11-01-2004, 07:31 PM
sierra_bound

Great time, CodeRed. Congrats. :toast:
11-01-2004, 08:53 PM
blinky

Quote:

Originally Posted by CodeRed

25 sec at last, on win2k too ;)

[IMG]http://home.exetel.com.au/codered/fx53/superpi25sec.jpg[IMG]

It wouldve been easier to just install win2003 than squeeze that last 20 MHz out of this chip :D

hey codered, why dont u use your own processtimer proggy to show the exact time?
11-01-2004, 09:54 PM
CodeRed

Quote:

Originally Posted by blinky

hey codered, why dont u use your own processtimer proggy to show the exact time?

25.937 sec for that run ;)

I managed 26.000 3 times @ 3220 MHz but it just wouldnt go under 26 sec :(
11-02-2004, 03:14 AM
cpulloverclock

I just used the patched version to see if I could get 27s in WC :)

vcore : 1.53-1.55 full

5m32s for the 8M and 5m06s for the patched at 4233MHz

very nice proc for a D0 :)

Pat is enabled

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/28..gif
11-03-2004, 10:21 AM
Onepagebook

http://www.e04hardware.com/record/fx5533gpi32m.jpg
11-03-2004, 10:53 AM
saci

is 35sec ok for amd 64 @ 260x10 on 512 mb single chann ram @ 218 2,5-3-3-7 ?
11-03-2004, 07:13 PM
cpulloverclock

30s at 4188MHz with my P4P800SE and 26"23s at 4198MHz for Spi 32M (english version with Xp is the best)
24"16s with the patched version and the 2K3 at 4178MHz

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/4192.gif
11-04-2004, 07:17 AM
LikwidKool

1 Attachment(s)

So far with my winny, this is the best I can do. I am still pushing default multi. Will see later what I can do with dropping the multi and higher ram clock. Actually would that even make a difference, as I would imagine super pi is mainly a cpu bench?

MSI K8N Neo2
3200+ winny @ 265x10 1.65v
2x512 OCZ PC3700 2.5-3-3-10 1t @ 265
11-04-2004, 12:13 PM
Mrki

my new result ;)

http://mitglied.lycos.de/siedl/9x295...8_pi_33sek.jpg
11-04-2004, 04:52 PM
bias_hjorth

The good´ old 3000 having some fun.

http://www.oc-central.dk/tobias/31.gif - Man I wish I could do 30 but this is def. the max of this cpu at least on prommy.
11-04-2004, 05:40 PM
SADS

hi there, first post :D hoorraah

i get 40s on the nose with my AMD 3500, will try and get some specs in sig soon.
I have also got some troubs OCing, i have some guesses as to what the solutions may be, however this is the wrong thread for them :p:
11-04-2004, 06:08 PM
Squid_Spit

1 Attachment(s)

heres mine
11-04-2004, 06:23 PM
notoriousformula

34 secs with A64 3000+ NC @ 2.7Ghz(270x10) 1.67V, PC3700EB 2.9Vdimm
11-05-2004, 04:37 PM
bias_hjorth

3700cg, kinda poor ballistix
http://www.oc-central.dk/tobias/29.jpg
def. 28sec with some better memory!
11-05-2004, 05:54 PM
CodeRed

Quote:

Originally Posted by bias_hjorth

3700cg, kinda poor ballistix

def. 28sec with some better memory!

Easy 28 sec with BH5 are good timings ... 28 sec @ 2994 (11x272) on a 1Mb S754.
11-05-2004, 07:23 PM
funkflix

I think the Proz. will give me another 100 MHz easy! And tomorrow i will give
them BH5 +3,6V and have some 1:1 action :D First day playing with A64.

http://people.freenet.de/funkflix/pi31.jpg
11-06-2004, 03:58 AM
bias_hjorth

Quote:

Originally Posted by CodeRed

Easy 28 sec with BH5 are good timings ... 28 sec @ 2994 (11x272) on a 1Mb S754.

Yeah :D. The only problem is that I dont have any high speed modules. My ballistix craps out at 240..
11-06-2004, 12:34 PM
Pejsen

Quote:

Originally Posted by bias_hjorth

Yeah :D. The only problem is that I dont have any high speed modules. My ballistix craps out at 240..

Very nice scores and tweaking on every cpu :)
11-06-2004, 12:40 PM
bias_hjorth

thank you :toast:
The 3000 was very tweaked. I havent even started tweaking for real on the 3700 yet so I hope I´ve another second to gain :D
11-06-2004, 02:32 PM
Tom Holck

Quote:

Originally Posted by bias_hjorth

thank you :toast:
The 3000 was very tweaked. I havent even started tweaking for real on the 3700 yet so I hope I´ve another second to gain :D

You meen +3700 not 3700Mhz
11-06-2004, 02:34 PM
Tom Holck

1 Attachment(s)

OK you now I got it

FX55 Cascade at -125 C

MSI
Thanks to oppainter for recommend the MSI
11-06-2004, 02:37 PM
funkflix

Holy Sh**!

Any SuperPi run? :)
11-06-2004, 02:38 PM
bias_hjorth

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

You meen +3700 not 3700Mhz

I am sorry but I dont understand you?
I didnt write 3700mhz anywhere?
I wrote the 3000 and was refering to my older cpu which Pejsen did to. And I wrote 3700 afterwards and was ofcause refering to the 3700+
11-06-2004, 02:39 PM
Crow

:slobber:
11-06-2004, 02:39 PM
Zeus

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

FX55 Cascade at -125 C

MSI
Thanks to oppainter for recommend the MSI

Over 2 seconds better than the score from the portugese guys! :slobber:

Well done!! :toast:

You seem to be the master of PiFast. ;)
11-06-2004, 02:42 PM
Tom Holck

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus

Over 2 seconds better than the score from the portugese guys! :slobber:

Well done!! :toast:

You seem to be the master of PiFast. ;)

I like that little bench :D

quick and easy
11-06-2004, 03:00 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

I like that little bench :D

quick and easy

very good and cpumark, 3dmark, Superpi 838? :slobber:
11-06-2004, 04:10 PM
Tom Holck

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

very good and cpumark, 3dmark, Superpi 838? :slobber:

Got it ;)

22 Sek...win2003 64 bit
11-06-2004, 04:15 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

Got it ;)

22 Sek...win2003 64 bit

:p: :toast:
11-06-2004, 04:23 PM
mg84

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

Got it ;)

22 Sek...win2003 64 bit

congratulation, your the number 1 :toast:
11-06-2004, 04:42 PM
CodeRed

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

Got it ;)

22 Sek...win2003 64 bit

Wow ... I can picture memesama running around the room searching for his LN2 dewar :p:

Congrats :toast:
11-06-2004, 04:45 PM
Tom Holck

Quote:

Originally Posted by CodeRed

Wow ... I can picture memesama running around the room searching for his LN2 dewar :p:

Congrats :toast:

LoL :toast:

btw. thanks for Tweak64 it was used well :p:
11-06-2004, 04:48 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by CodeRed

Wow ... I can picture memesama running around the room searching for his LN2 dewar :p:

Congrats :toast:

he is changing his bad FX-55 :D
11-06-2004, 05:17 PM
CodeRed

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

he is changing his bad FX-55 :D

could be an interesting race. Worst case it wil be a tie, as I dont think the FX chips will hit 21 sec (3.9GHz) just yet
11-06-2004, 05:19 PM
Tom Holck

Quote:

Originally Posted by CodeRed

could be an interesting race. Worst case it wil be a tie, as I dont think the FX chips will hit 21 sec (3.9GHz) just yet

Give me a 939 mobo at 2.2 volt, then I'll give you 3.9Ghz :p:
11-06-2004, 05:26 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by CodeRed

could be an interesting race. Worst case it wil be a tie, as I dont think the FX chips will hit 21 sec (3.9GHz) just yet

I think memesama can have 21s at 3620-3630MHz and 21s at 3750-3760MHz
11-06-2004, 05:27 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

Give me a 939 mobo at 2.2 volt, then I'll give you 3.9Ghz :p:

the future DFI S939 board
11-06-2004, 05:30 PM
CodeRed

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

I think memesama can have 21s at 3620-3630MHz and 21s at 3750-3760MHz

22 sec @ 3630 ... whats he running TCCD @ 330 MHz?
11-07-2004, 08:05 AM
blander

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

FX55 Cascade at -125 C

MSI
Thanks to oppainter for recommend the MSI

i will see a superpi 1m run :slobber:
11-07-2004, 08:11 AM
misteroadster

i'm going to do a battery of tests to know how much mhz wants my FX with about 255/270 1:1 to have 1 sec between 2442 mhz and 2850 , it should be interresting.
here is the first :
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/32s2442.JPG

the second, with same timings but desynch 183: 283X183/200=258Mhz.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/31s2547.JPG

Third 291X183/200=266Mhz
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/30s2618.JPG

4th 301X183/200=276Mhz
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/29s2717.JPG
11-07-2004, 09:46 AM
Tom Holck

Quote:

Originally Posted by blander

i will see a superpi 1m run :slobber:

Already done :D

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=1149

It was so fast, that you did'n se it

22 Sek :cool:
11-07-2004, 09:47 AM
misteroadster

tom can you have the same times /same frequency than me ?

My last screenshot , my FX53 can't give me much :
I've added a piece of fun with my FSB and desynch 150 :D :
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/28s2841.JPG
11-07-2004, 10:09 AM
misteroadster

I've done 26sec @ 30..Mhz with my FX55 , opp did 24 sec at 34..Mhz , Tom 22 at 36..Mhz ??
I deduct there's 2 sec missing between 3000 and 3400Mhz. Strange. :confused:
11-07-2004, 10:19 AM
blander

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

Already done :D

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=1149

It was so fast, that you did'n se it

22 Sek :cool:

very nice, what's the wr?
11-07-2004, 01:27 PM
Zeus

Guys,

I have a question about SuperPi.
If i run SPi 1m, 2m or 4m CPU utilization is 100% throughout the entire run but as soon as i try 8m or higher, CPU utilization fluctuate between 0 and 100%.
Also, 32m took 44minutes to complete at 10x235, not good at all i think.

I have no programs running in the background.

WTF is causing this? :confused:
Anyone else with this problem?

http://www.dc3k.com/hosted/getimg/CPU_util.jpg

Look at the CPU utilization statistic diagram. :(
11-07-2004, 01:38 PM
Learn

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus

Guys,

I have a question about SuperPi.
If i run SPi 1m, 2m or 4m CPU utilization is 100% throughout the entire run but as soon as i try 8m or higher, CPU utilization fluctuate between 0 and 100%.
Also, 32m took 44minutes to complete at 10x235, not good at all i think.

I have no programs running in the background.

WTF is causing this? :confused:
Anyone else with this problem?

http://www.dc3k.com/hosted/getimg/CPU_util.jpg

Look at the CPU utilization statistic diagram. :(

it's windows 2000? use windows xp or windows 2003 server :)
11-07-2004, 01:41 PM
Zeus

Is win2K the culprit??
11-07-2004, 01:48 PM
bachus_anonym

i'm not sure but it might be caused by some sort of instability...
what sometimes happens (if you look at processes window) is a process called drwtsn.exe kicks in stealing cpu clocks... i'm not sure what causes debugger to kick in....
i got that sometimes when i push FSB to high on my Infinity...
11-07-2004, 01:49 PM
Learn

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus

Is win2K the culprit??

yes, it's bad with super pi > 1M
11-07-2004, 01:54 PM
Zeus

I can imagine that but 2350MHz isn't that high i'd say, it's prime stable at that speed.
If i remember right i have this at default speed as well, have to try again to be sure.
Thanks for your input anyway. ;)
11-07-2004, 05:11 PM
cpulloverclock

2 f**ked and faked scores :rolleyes: :mad:

19 & 21s...
http://www16.big.or.jp/~bunnywk/cgi-bin/superpi.cgi
11-08-2004, 08:19 AM
Tom Holck

Quote:

Originally Posted by misteroadster

I've done 26sec @ 30..Mhz with my FX55 , opp did 24 sec at 34..Mhz , Tom 22 at 36..Mhz ??
I deduct there's 2 sec missing between 3000 and 3400Mhz. Strange. :confused:

I'm at 3730 64 bit OS misteroadster.

Depending of OS and tweaks and Ram-speed:

25 sec 3120 Mhz (64 OS) 940 Mobo
24 sec 3350 Mhz (32 OS) 940
23 sec 3520 Mhz (64 OS) 939
22 sec 3730 Mhz (64 OS) 939
21 sec ? my gess 3950

Btw nice FSB speed you got, my max is 313 then Ram is 3-4-4-8 :toast:

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

2 f**ked and faked scores :rolleyes: :mad:

19 & 21s...
http://www16.big.or.jp/~bunnywk/cgi-bin/superpi.cgi

Yes, the one is now removed, but still 21/3825/975/244 must be fake at least at least 100 mhz to slow, and slow FSB :(
11-08-2004, 11:09 AM
misteroadster

Okay tom, are you sure 2003 64 bits is faster than 2003 32bits?
25 sec at 3120 on 940 is very impressive !!!!
Can you try to analyse the progression of the 939 and the same 64 or 32bits OS when you ll got the time ?
As you could see on my screenshots :
the best for 1sec gain :2547-2619=80mhz with same settings, just FSB increased.
After that 1sec again between : 2619-2717 =100mhz same setting, just FSB increased.
And 2717-2847=130mhz same settings but FSB-20Mhz.

I've done 26sec at 3060 but i can do better now , 2847-3060 =213 mhz/2sec.
I understand your FX 939 is not better than your 940 setup , normally it's 1 sec better easy.
Give a try with your ECC sticks , i think it'll be interresting.

Tom turn on my light please , and of course congrats, if i was nearest from you , i'll lend you my BH-5 and my X800 :toast:
11-08-2004, 11:16 AM
cpulloverclock

Tom u dont want to test a dothan + aopen with your cascade? 100% compatibility
11-08-2004, 01:00 PM
Tom Holck

Quote:

Originally Posted by misteroadster

Okay tom, are you sure 2003 64 bits is faster than 2003 32bits?
25 sec at 3120 on 940 is very impressive !!!!
Can you try to analyse the progression of the 939 and the same 64 or 32bits OS when you ll got the time ?
As you could see on my screenshots :
the best for 1sec gain :2547-2619=80mhz with same settings, just FSB increased.
After that 1sec again between : 2619-2717 =100mhz same setting, just FSB increased.
And 2717-2847=130mhz same settings but FSB-20Mhz.

I've done 26sec at 3060 but i can do better now , 2847-3060 =213 mhz/2sec.
I understand your FX 939 is not better than your 940 setup , normally it's 1 sec better easy.
Give a try with your ECC sticks , i think it'll be interresting.

Tom turn on my light please , and of course congrats, if i was nearest from you , i'll lend you my BH-5 and my X800 :toast:

I'm sure 64 is faster in Pifast and SuperPi with the same clock, but more heat, that can affeckt the max OC. And then it's not faster.
I'll compair 32/64 on 939 later. But have done that on the 940, difference in performance 32/64 was aprox 60hz in arround 31-3200. The force of the 940 was stability and stability... High CoreVolt (2.112 stabil) The ECC was stabil at 262 fastest settings, thats close to 939 performance.

Thanks for the offer. I'll get my 2. x800xt in a few dayes. But it take a lot to insulate and make it work on the cascades. Huge kondensation.
Another thing the MSI Neo2 is very small for my coolingheads. The AGP is close to the cooling head without insulation :eek:

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

Tom u dont want to test a dothan + aopen with your cascade? 100% compatibility

Tel me about it!?
11-08-2004, 01:23 PM
aoc007

Dothan on a cascade? Now that I would love to see :slobber:
11-08-2004, 02:12 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

I'm sure 64 is faster in Pifast and SuperPi with the same clock, but more heat, that can affeckt the max OC. And then it's not faster.
I'll compair 32/64 on 939 later. But have done that on the 940, difference in performance 32/64 was aprox 60hz in arround 31-3200. The force of the 940 was stability and stability... High CoreVolt (2.112 stabil) The ECC was stabil at 262 fastest settings, thats close to 939 performance.

Thanks for the offer. I'll get my 2. x800xt in a few dayes. But it take a lot to insulate and make it work on the cascades. Huge kondensation.
Another thing the MSI Neo2 is very small for my coolingheads. The AGP is close to the cooling head without insulation :eek:

Tel me about it!?

a dothan at 3.8GHz is more powerful than a FX-55 at the same frequency
11-08-2004, 03:11 PM
Tom Holck

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

a dothan at 3.8GHz is more powerful than a FX-55 at the same frequency

OK, when do I test it :banana4:
11-08-2004, 10:31 PM
zakelwe

Excellent Superpi and pifast scores Tom. I particularily like the pifast score :)

Edging slowly towards the magic 30second barrier ( some way to go though ).

Regards

Andy
11-08-2004, 11:39 PM
misteroadster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

I'm sure 64 is faster in Pifast and SuperPi with the same clock, but more heat, that can affeckt the max OC. And then it's not faster.
I'll compair 32/64 on 939 later. But have done that on the 940, difference in performance 32/64 was aprox 60hz in arround 31-3200. The force of the 940 was stability and stability... High CoreVolt (2.112 stabil) The ECC was stabil at 262 fastest settings, thats close to 939 performance.

Thanks for the offer. I'll get my 2. x800xt in a few dayes. But it take a lot to insulate and make it work on the cascades. Huge kondensation.
Another thing the MSI Neo2 is very small for my coolingheads. The AGP is close to the cooling head without insulation :eek:

Tel me about it!?

Thanks tom.
Can you try yours ECC sticks on 939 if it works ?
Do some tests at same timings with ECC- and non ECC ram , and you ll can touch de diff between 939 and 940.
11-09-2004, 03:43 AM
funkflix

http://people.freenet.de/funkflix/pi30.png

I wonder which clocks i would need, to get the 29 sec. ?!
11-09-2004, 03:55 AM
CTKP

Running 1:1 will get you there.
11-09-2004, 04:05 AM
funkflix

Yeah, BH5 @ 310 2.0-2-2-5! :banana:
11-09-2004, 04:12 AM
misteroadster

Quote:

Originally Posted by CTKP

Running 1:1 will get you there.

Yes, probably :toast: if i could have 30 sec at 2674 With winXp you can have 29 sec at 2780 easy with 2K3 server and 278 2/2/2/1 1:1.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/350030sec.JPG
11-09-2004, 04:18 AM
funkflix

How much Volts ~ for 275 2.0-2-2-5? 3,75 + i think!
11-09-2004, 04:21 AM
macci

Quote:

I wonder which clocks i would need, to get the 29 sec. ?!

w/ that RAM divider mine reaches 29sec at 2817MHz (11x256) under W2K.
11-09-2004, 04:25 AM
funkflix

How much Volts on ur 3200+ ?Thats exactly the same settings i have, just
a few MHz more. U tweaked it with A64-Tweaker?

Edit: Ah, ok ~ 1,8V.
11-09-2004, 06:24 AM
funkflix

I cant get my 3200+ stable over 2800MHz, doesnt metter how much Volts.
1,76 was the max.! It runs better with less Volts! Do u think the Heatspreader
ist the Problem? Maybe i should cut him off! Can run SuperPi with 2790 MHz
@ 1,59V! Strange! I can run the BH5 at an lower Multi @ 260 2-2-2-5 1T
with 3,45V, so i think thats not the problem!
11-09-2004, 07:05 PM
cpulloverclock

eheh not bad :cool:

I'm 6th of the P4-36GP, I get 33s at 3705MHz :cry:
http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/36-GP/36-GP-TABLE.htm

31s at 4026MHz with only a fsb of 236.8 :)

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/30...gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/3600.gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/3597.gif
11-09-2004, 11:18 PM
zyx

1 Attachment(s)

29 bh5 2-2-2-5 dfi nf3 250gb. 1.85vcore
11-10-2004, 12:19 AM
kiko

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

eheh not bad :cool:

I'm 6th of the P4-36GP, I get 33s at 3705MHz :cry:
http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/36-GP/36-GP-TABLE.htm

31s at 4026MHz with only a fsb of 236.8 :)

nice work there cpu. :)
BTW a 3.4 D0 can be unlock on a P4C800-E?
coz i can not find a 2.8 D0. :D

Ciao
11-10-2004, 01:23 AM
Pejsen

Quote:

Originally Posted by zyx

29 bh5 2-2-2-5 dfi nf3 250gb. 1.85vcore

1mb cache?? NICE result!
:cool:
11-10-2004, 04:07 AM
zyx

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pejsen

1mb cache?? NICE result!
:cool:

yeah man, 1m cache. thanks
11-10-2004, 04:15 AM
cpulloverclock

33s...

very nice time

http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/36-GP/36-GP-TABLE.htm

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/3708.gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/3708.41.gif
11-10-2004, 04:47 AM
cpulloverclock

:D google is my friend :banana4:

http://www.thelab.gr/archive/topic/4824-1.html

http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/ProcessTimer.exe

already 0.040

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/3700.gif
11-10-2004, 06:06 AM
HaLDoL

30 seconds
DFI nf3
A64 claw
BH5 @ 3.70V
100% air

http://kaine.studentenweb.org/superpi.1M.30sec.jpg
11-10-2004, 06:58 AM
misteroadster

My best for 35 sec (stock FX53's time).
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/35sec2221.JPG

And here a funny 1M :confused:
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/21loop.JPG
11-10-2004, 07:35 AM
JBREAKS

1 Attachment(s)

thats mine not sure what it means
11-10-2004, 10:11 AM
Pejsen

Quote:

Originally Posted by misteroadster

And here a funny 1M :confused:

*PIC*

LOL that makes no sense at all. If i remember correct Tom H once ran a SuperPI 1M with only 18loops :confused:
11-10-2004, 11:21 AM
HaLDoL

Quote:

Originally Posted by GravediggA

How much Volts ~ for 275 2.0-2-2-5? 3,75 + i think!

I need 3.65 for 277
11-10-2004, 07:04 PM
misteroadster

WR ? :confused:
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/31s2450.JPG
11-11-2004, 03:28 AM
cpulloverclock

I'm in the tanuki's database of the P4 36GP

6th :)

http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/36-GP/36-GP-TABLE.htm
11-11-2004, 03:31 AM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by misteroadster

WR ? :confused:
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/31s2450.JPG

yes!!

send u result here

http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/24-GP/24-GP-TABLE.htm

yok@mx.biwa.ne.jp <yok@mx.biwa.ne.jp>

try a jap superpi, maxmem=104 to improve the score...

gogogogo
11-11-2004, 04:48 AM
zakelwe

So the highest air cooled AMD is 3027 ? I did 3009 the other day without trying too hard which puts me in 3rd place.

It's getting colder here as well ! :)

Regards

Andy
11-12-2004, 06:03 AM
FreshMeat

http://mitglied.lycos.de/freshmeat666/sp34.JPG
11-12-2004, 06:36 PM
Stonecoldkilla

1 Attachment(s)

I guess this one aint to bad.I just got the system up and runnig and still playing with it some.
11-12-2004, 08:44 PM
Formann

I dont know what made me try super-pi with my surfing/gaming install, but suddenly it got a little bit extiting. This is a WindowsXP SP1 install with absolutely no tweaks.

A64 3500+ @ 2670Mhz (1.7v Air-cooled; SLK948-U /w 70mm 3300RPM fan, 21c room temp)
267*10 2-2-2-8-12-16

This is a crappy NewCastle... lol

http://privat.bluezone.no/forman/images/31sek.JPG

Tomorrow im gonna bench with Win2003, A64 Tweaker etc. 30sek Should be doable :D
Not too bad for a poor 512kb chip...
11-13-2004, 05:03 AM
enduracell

Formann very nice score.
What mobo are u using?
11-13-2004, 05:11 AM
Crankster

Formann, 29 is doable if you can get 275+ fsb and ramdisk. Fight for your fellow newcastle owners against the tide of winnies and clawhammers!
11-13-2004, 06:01 AM
SAE

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crankster

Formann, 29 is doable if you can get 275+ fsb and ramdisk. Fight for your fellow newcastle owners against the tide of winnies and clawhammers!

Hmm. In what way a ram disk helps? Erm, ... I mean, IMO it can only help during larger calculations like 16M/32M, can't it?

Please tell me how to set up a Ramdrive (I do not really know much about it except the fact, a winME bootdisk uses one - but that's DOS ;) )
11-13-2004, 06:54 AM
Formann

Quote:

Originally Posted by enduracell

Formann very nice score.
What mobo are u using?

Its a Gigabyte K8NS Ultra-939. Not too bad, but the vcore is all over the place. Not very stable. Think im gonna try the MSI to.

Crankster: I wont get my BH5 to do 275+. One of the sticks can do 280 @ 3.55v, but the other wont do more than 270 @ 3.5v
The 3500+ is maxed @ 2670Mhz unless i do a vmod. (or open-window-mod :p: )

Maybe 29sek is doable with 271-272 1:1 and fully tweaked 2003.... hmmm.
11-13-2004, 02:00 PM
kristos

I've been told that you can get better scores on superpi if you use windows 2003 server but there are so many different versions like "corporate" and "enterprise" or just plain server.

can someone tell me wich one too get? :shrug:
11-13-2004, 02:30 PM
Hilppa

More here

http://www.takorautaa.net/img/tuloks..._superpi8m.jpg

:banana:
11-15-2004, 02:32 PM
rkolegendkiller

45 Second's with AMD athlon xp 2500+@ 2.43ghz.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:03 PM.

XtremeSystems