Sorry
Printable View
Sorry
NP :D, we all were noobs, we'll all be again noobs as technology changes so quickely. But there are so many posts these times with that VID misunderstanding :)Quote:
Originally Posted by fng77
Yes how many times we have to repeat this.
VID's starts with 1.20v and go UP... If you see less then that it's because you have power economy options enabled.
He he, Thats true.
btw my real vid is 1.3000.
Thats OK , I read many times over that VID is fixed , so I guess I was wrong too (VID as opposed to vcore) . My quad's VID is 1.2125v but its still an average overclocker at best.Quote:
Originally Posted by jonny_ftm
:shrug:
What do you consider average?Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie-revhead
I´m stuck here. Cant get stable with 410 fsb even with 1.45 vore. I´m afraid to fry it if I put too much jucie in it, or degradation. On the other hand, I used 1.5 volts for my e2160, but that was a much cheaper cpu
That's is a good overclock and keeps it completely on the safe side. As far as running 1.45v, "Ha", I have ran my chip with 1.65v. Intel's white papers put the limit at 1.55v, so 1.45v is not a stretch. More than likely you would need to go to 1.47v or 1.48v to get the extra 10Mhz FSB speed. Whether it's worth the extra heat is up to you. Also, keep in mind that as soon as your chip goes under load you will get Vdroop unless your board has load line calibration or has been modified. Vdroop, drops your voltage down to prevent the voltage from jumping to high above the set voltage when you come off of load. My point is, although you are putting your voltage at 1.47v, in reality, under load it will be much less depending on your Vdroop.
At any rate, a 50% overclock is nothing to sneeze at, :D
Utnorris
Thanks:)
Yes you´re right. I rather run the cpu at 400 fsb at 1.425 than 410 at 1.475. I tried to get it stable at 410 1.475 but didnt succeed. I think it need closer to 1.5 for that fsb. Then I got 5-10 C more to handle..
But its always nice to see how high you can go. Its funny how you push the limit all the time. At first when you get a brand new cpu, its like, noo I dont wanna get over 1.45, after acouple of days, 1.5 is the absoulte limit, then 1.5250 and so on.:p: I haven gone over 1.6 anyway, with my 2160 since I dont have any water at the moment.
I just managed to bench at 4005 MHz , it seems quite a few can bench higher than that . Its not a poor overclocker , it requires much less voltage than my last q6600 but has topped out only about 70mhz better , so go figure.Quote:
Originally Posted by MosIncredible
:shrug:
I am working on a heat issue so maybe that will help things when its sorted.
:up:
.
Being able to bench it and running a stability test are two different things. I can get 4050Mhz to load and bench, but it won't pass an OCCT stability test. Don't get me wrong, its a great achievement to just be able to get the chip to boot to 4050, but see if it will pass OCCT or P95 stability tests and if it does you definitely have a gem.
Utnorris
Mine only posts at 4050 with 1.5 bios voltage, its a real hotty though, so even if it booted, it would be too hot to bench.Quote:
Originally Posted by Utnorris
Even with w/cing? I post to 4050 and its not the temps that kill me just my chip. At 3825 I hit 70c under load, but under gaming barely hit 56c. Anyway, any hints to hitting the higher FSB let me know.
Utnorris
utnorris - what fans are you using on your rad and did you test with single fans ? How much difference did push-pull make ?
:up:
Those are San 1011's. I have a bunch laying around so I thought I would do a push/pull. After doing some reading, this seemed like the best way since I am running them at 5v so they are very quiet and I still get low temps. I was using Silenx which were very quiet, but in this configuration my temps are 10-12c cooler. Those fans are very efficient and if you read the latest fan test at the top of the "Liquid Cooling" thread, they have the best CFM and are highly recommended.
Utnorris
P.S. I may end up selling my extra's on here depending on whether I think people would want them.
I just bought three Scythe Ultra Kaze 2000rpm fans for my rad , they are a good balance of noise when turned down vs power when turned up , but still a bit noisey for me .
:up:
guys any comments on the Q6600 batch L723B837?
try pelase 9x multi. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by fng77
bios> CIE > disable
Bios> Speed step > disable
try :p:
Running my L804A900 G0 q6600 currently at 400x9 = 3.6ghz at 1.55vcore Bios set.
Idles at 30 on all cores, Full OCCT load is 49-49-50-50 degrees C with my apogee GTX
I haven't tweaked the volts or FSB much yet. I know I cna't boot past 3ghz with 400 strp. I'm currently on 266/677 strap 1000mhz memory.
Will tweak more and report final settings.
EDit:
Seems 3.6ghz is my max at 1.55vcore L804's suck
Is there a direct correlation between the VID of a processor and its overclocking capabilities; I ask because I just started OCing my new Q6600 and saw that my VID is 1.325. I know this is high in comparison to most others, but will it hurt me?
Mine is an L7 also, but it OC's piss poor or just my mobo is piss poor ( Abit IP35-E )
1.315v bios 3,2Ghz (400*8)
I am still a little new to OCing Intel and I was wondering why so many people are running a CPU mulitplier of 8. Is this just so you can gain a higher FSB, which will bring the ram closer to 1:1? I would appreciate any tips that you can provide as far as squeezing the last bit of OC from my CPU.
My setup is the following: Q6600, ASUS P5K-E, 2x2GB Mushkin Redline PC2-8000. I have already had the ram up to 1066 at stock volts and I am fairly confident that I can go past 1100+ with some voltage.
I'm currently doing 9x356=3.2Ghz. Vcore is 1.3V(1.28V idle, 1.29V load). All chipset and VDIMM voltages are at stock. RAM running at 4-4-4-12 1:1. My oc can pass 24hrs small fft and blend but will restart automatically after few hours with large fft. No bluescreen message unlike small fft/blend where i will get bluecreen if oc is unstable. What should I do to pass 24hrs large fft?
Hi,
I need a little help to buy a q6600 whit a decent VID.. I listen abouth the famous L737b.. but i don`t believe that they are available at this point .. or yes ?
or can yours advice me any other FPO whit a low VID...??
Thanks!!!
Yes there is.Quote:
Originally Posted by gearhead364
I had a 1.28vid that needed 1.45v for 3600Mhz (400x9) and would still fail prime95 blend test.
My 1.21vid needs only 1.26v (in bios/ 1.28cpuz) to run 3600Mhz stable as rock Prime95 blend and 3dmarks (1200ddr2 Pl5).
But for over 4050Mhz they both pretty much maxed out the same with the lower vid needing less vcore then the higher vid cpu.