-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zucker2k
You beat me to it Sergio. The guy is only stable at 457 and he wants to see what? :ROTF:
yeah ! i have a short tale
i was once upon a time a poor Asus user that couldn't get over that on FSB....
gigabyte
the end. :rofl:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
andressergio
mate we have nothing to prove to ya we just did it months ago :up:
But you didn't.
Saying you did something, when you in fact did not, makes you look like a poser.
If you did, repost the images. Why are you so scared to prove me wrong?
I've read all 112 pages of this thread. I had read them all before I posted.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
Yet you are the guys who are claiming to be stable at 550+ FSB and show no proof. Once again, 10 seconds of superpi stress is nothing. A screenshot of superpi or prime does not prove stability any more. Period.
And as you can see with my stability testing, I was at minimum 200 Linx loops stable at 550fsb on my e8600. Which is something NONE of you can say about your overclocks.
I'll boot up at 560 and do a superpi for you tonight. But honestly I think you guys all just call it a day and say 'stable' way too easily.
http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/9162/blend95501.jpg
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/7183/blend95502.jpg
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/7859/9550blend3.jpg
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/9803/965045ghz.jpg
All done on Gigabyte p45's, 2 different p45 giga boards,2 different c2q cpu's. a q9550 and a q9650.
If you take the time to read the threads you will see the stable oc's posted by many.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
andressergio
yeah ! i have a short tale
i was once upon a time a poor Asus user that couldn't get over that on FSB....
gigabyte
the end. :rofl:
:rofl:
Great story!
I consider Prime95 a fine way to test your CPU stability...
If your overclocks are stable enough for your uses, why do you need more?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
But you didn't.
Saying you did something, when you in fact did not, makes you look like a poser.
If you did, repost the images. Why are you so scared to prove me wrong?
I've read all 112 pages of this thread. I had read them all before I posted.
you should be of this Q9650 @ 4.115 9x457 :rofl: 457 is soooo maraca :rofl:
you enter on a thread with 19 post attacking ppl i think if you run your asus your beloved 500 linx loops some mosfet will blow up and rip you an eye
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
But you didn't.
Saying you did something, when you in fact did not, makes you look like a poser.
If you did, repost the images. Why are you so scared to prove me wrong?
I've read all 112 pages of this thread. I had read them all before I posted.
Sergio has proven STABLE overclocks far beyond what your nvidia board will ever do using a 45nm quad. You come to this thread being an ass and really deserve no response.
When you top these oc's on your nvidia chipset board using a c2quad please come back and post your results. Until then learn to show respect to others in this great thread.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OC Nub
Sergio has proven STABLE overclocks far beyond what your nvidia board will ever do using a 45nm quad. You come to this thread being an ass and really deserve no response.
When you top these oc's on your nvidia chipset board using a c2quad please come back and post your results. Until then learn to show respect to others in this great thread.
+1 for that :up:
-
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zoson
Yet you are the guys who are claiming to be stable at 550+ FSB and show no proof. Once again, 10 seconds of superpi stress is nothing. A screenshot of superpi or prime does not prove stability any more. Period.
And as you can see with my stability testing, I was at minimum 200 Linx loops stable at 550fsb on my e8600. Which is something NONE of you can say about your overclocks.
I'll boot up at 560 and do a superpi for you tonight. But honestly I think you guys all just call it a day and say 'stable' way too easily.
Wow, and I thought I needed to chill, lol.
You think that I am posting my SuperPI results to show stability? If you think this you are mistaken. Im not trying to prove anything, including stability. Im trying to get my times faster and faster.
Why is that word "stability" still disputed. In fact the word is really subjective, and is defined differently from person to person, as it should be. Why are you trying to force people to accept your definition. For me I dont see any point in doing 12hrs Prime Blend, as long as I can play my games, edit and convert video, surf the web, Im fully stable for my needs. I do completely see why someone would need to have their system 12hrs + prime Stable, especially if their folding 24/7.
-
Does 30 minutes of priming at 8x525 fsb count? :D Sorry, couldn't help it. I could show you more, but you don't deserve it. How about you show me a quad at 8x512 32M? That shouldn't be too difficult? :p:
http://www.hostthenpost.org/uploads/...8ecb7bed43.jpg
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Viper
Wow, and I thought I needed to chill, lol.
You think that I am posting my SuperPI results to show stability? If you think this you are mistaken. Im not trying to prove anything, including stability. Im trying to get my times faster and faster.
Why is that word "stability" still disputed. In fact the word is really subjective, and is defined differently from person to person, as it should be. Why are you trying to force people to accept your definition. For me I dont see any point in doing 12hrs Prime Blend, as long as I can play my games, edit and convert video, surf the web, Im fully stable for my needs. I do completely see why someone would need to have their system 12hrs + prime Stable, especially if their folding 24/7.
Viper he did say it 500 linx loops :rofl:, or maybe 1,5 month prime blend ? that should be enough for him i think
And we dont think that you where posting stability we think you were just enjoying ya rig as we like to do...sad that his soooo limited
Cheers :up:
Sergio
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zucker2k
Does 30 minutes of priming at 8x525 fsb count? :D Sorry, couldn't help it. I could show you more, but you don't deserve it. How about you show me a quad at 8x512 32M? That shouldn't be too difficult? :p:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zucker2k
Very nice results Zucker.
-
Hehe, I love my Asus board!! Haha. Who is this guy? I was going to say the same thing, 19 posts and his way is the only way its to be done? And were did anyone say we are posting SuperPI times to show/prove stability? I sure as hell wasn't. I was only going for speed and faster times.
I started with a P5E3 Premium x48 with my Q9450 then switched over to a Q9650 and P5Q3 Deluxe P45 and saw huge improvements. No, they weren't what you Gigabyte guys are getting but P45 showed huge improvements over x48 with my Quad testing. I don't bench my Q9650 but still have it running 24/7 4.2Ghz in my media center server. I could play any game I wanted and encode dvds all day long so it was 100% stable for me, that's all that mattered.
Here are some shots that I have from my Q9650 / P45 testing.
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...0Mhz_20min.jpg
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...i_1M_10498.jpg
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s..._10m52657s.jpg
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...4_PhysXoff.jpg
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
deachus
Hehe, I love my Asus board!! Haha. Who is this guy? I was going to say the same thing, 19 posts and his way is the only way its to be done? And were did anyone say we are posting SuperPI times to show/prove stability? I sure as hell wasn't. I was only going for speed and faster times.
I started with a P5E3 Premium x48 with my Q9450 then switched over to a Q9650 and P5Q3 Deluxe P45 and saw huge improvements. No, they weren't what you Gigabyte guys are getting but P45 showed huge improvements over x48 with my Quad testing. I don't bench my Q9650 but still have it running 24/7 4.2Ghz in my media center server. I could play any game I wanted and encode dvds all day long so it was 100% stable for me, that's all that mattered.
jeje thats awesome mate but look at your P45 rev ;) A3 thats the good one
Cheers and congrats
Sergio
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OC Nub
Very nice results Zucker.
Thanks Nub.
Ladies and gents, I present to you, 500 loops of linpack! Easy as pie; took less than a minute :rolleyes:
:eek: :ROTF:
http://www.hostthenpost.org/uploads/...2d256f65bb.jpg
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zucker2k
Thanks Nub.
Ladies and gents, I present to you, 500 loops of linpack! Easy as pie; took less than a minute :rolleyes:
:eek: :ROTF:
That proves it, there you go! :yepp:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Good job. :ROTF:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zucker2k
muaaaajaaaaaa there it goes first 500 loops ever :clap:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zucker2k
Thanks Nub.
Ladies and gents, I present to you, 500 loops of linpack! Easy as pie; took less than a minute :rolleyes:
:eek: :ROTF:
LMAO! Awesome :up:
-
1000 lets go for more !!!
-
IT'S OVER 9000!!!!1!1!!!!!1!
:ROTF:
10000 PASSES BABY!
http://ense7en.com/pics/LinX%20GFlop...sting/9000.jpg
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
-n7-
:rofl::ROTF::clap:
-
Use all memory when you use LinX.
Here you go. Like I said... SuperPI is easy, and by no means a measure of stability.
8x520
http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r...0mhz-8x520.jpg
9x500
http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r...0mhz-9x500.jpg
Working on that 560 now, it's a bit harder to catch a SuperPI at that fsb.
-
8.5x500
downloaded the new superpi.
http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r...mhz-85x500.jpg
At least I'm honest about what's stable and what's not.
-
Who has been claiming SPI 1M to be a measure of stability?