when will they (venice) hit the streets? :D
Printable View
when will they (venice) hit the streets? :D
Read three post above yours.Quote:
Originally Posted by enok
a better question is when will it hit newegg?Quote:
Originally Posted by conrad.maranan
no news??? try benching on air or water if really low temps wont work :stick:
Hi yall, this is my first post.
That is some impressive stuff. My clawhammer doesn't scale well at all at default voltage. Have you all tried the new relece of CPU-Z? It didn't mention if it had venice RAM corrections...but you never know.
Looks like the venice mem controler is REALLY spectacular, I bet the FX is jelios :). By the way, alot of people are speculating that AMD put an over clocking bug in there on purpose to hinder over clockers. Using the logic of Fixed multipliers as proof that AMD does not like over clockers. The fact is, the reason that the norm A64's are locked is so that people don't get chips that companys sell low speed parts as high speed parts. Remember hearing about the 1 million XP cpu's that were getting marked. Personaly, I think it is an error with an absolute value sign in the boot up cycle. As a programer, sometimes we get a little crazy to aviod math errors like dividing by 0 and like wise by just some code trickery. What happens is things like the negitive temp bug. Lets say the cpu is running at a core of -70, well, the MB would see 70c and respond acourdinly. That might not be the exsact problem mind you...but I do think it is a bug and not an intentinal attemt to hinder enthusiests from over clocking their own chips.
I must agree with you that it isn't very likely that the bug was made on purpose, but I don't think that AMD willl rush to the drawing board niether. Because there like maybe 10000 people atmost that have the stuff to get thier CPU to minus XX degrees.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gsus_Freak
I hope that the San Diego's won't have this problem because I'm gonna buy 1 and probebly put it under YoupY's cascade.
Seems goods this Venice, but with CPU-Z 1.28 there are bugs too ? :cool:
4x256 BH5 was tested and it wouldn't bootQuote:
Originally Posted by Hallowed
I can't wait to see how far back in bios revisions on the DFI this chip will boot from ; )
Yeo only at 2T :(Quote:
Originally Posted by HaLDoL
Ummmm......no. It was at 1t :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasonhk
s7e9h3n: Did you test how high the FSB did go with 4x512 and 1T timing? cus im going to order 4x512 TwinMOS Speed Premium & A64 with Venice core soon, and would like to know.
Never had 4x512 sticks to test :p: . I only was able to test 2x256 BH-5:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolle2k
http://img115.exs.cx/img115/9205/2754wx.jpg
anyone has a link to another venico or diego threat??? anywhere hopefully with runs on air, water and 4x512mb???
HEREQuote:
Originally Posted by metro_oc.cl
It's my thread about the 3800+ Venice. It was stickied, but I don't know what happened. Anyways, you'll find benches of the cpu on both stock and phase-change cooling......
Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
thanks mate but i have already read that one
Thanks for the info :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by pc ice
Quote:
Originally Posted by pc ice
nice ill be checking the forum then :banana: :banana:
w00t :party:
Can you give us a little hint? Good or bad?
what do you think :stick:
xtreme offcource :toast:
I'm sure this is what about 90% of us are waiting for....... :slobber:Quote:
Originally Posted by pc ice
I'm very curious what exactly is on the list of benches and other tests ;) ?
Thanks for your effort, pc ice :toast:
w00t! Water cooled Venice scores! PC Ice, you rock! :toast:
Th other 10% of us are wondering where are the XTREME screenies of this 3500+ :DQuote:
Originally Posted by HousERaT