Printable View
Also, please remember, that all these screenshot are using relatively "safe" timings. If I had time to tweak this setup, you'd very likely see much improved numbers......
I'm off to work, but I wanted to mention to those people that were waiting for a test with 4x256 that I didn't get around to it last night and I promise that's the first thing I'll do when I get a chance. Sorry....
omg, tested the 3500 yet?
The Venice looks like the Winchester was to the Newcastle... a "subtle" improvement. Hopefully it'll be available soon in quantity so the e-tailers dont GOUGE too much. I'm sure NEWGOUGE, I mean EGG will have a field day with Venice when they arrive!! I'll buy my FX55/90nM from Monarch :D
C
OMG :slobber:
This is way more than I'd expected :toast:
GJ AMD :banana:
think of a fx57 with that core, if that can hit 3.1ghz with ease a fx57 with ln2 can hit 4ghz 4.3ghz? :D :D :D
Plus, tax is no fun for us here in California.... :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie
:eek:
Thats not 3.1 with ease...Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowman89
Thats 3.1 on phase change..
Seems that phase change hasnt given a massive boost in overclocking performance, unless there is more to tweak out of it..
We shall see.
But 2.9gig on air is pretty impressive.
i think we will see more like 3.4-3.5 on the FX57 on vapo
so this one doesnt really scale with phase change either :( :(
i would like to see the 3500 or maybe a 3200 that is something that i can afford
This is Newcastel SH7-CG, not Venice ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by stealth17
There will be 3000+ based on Venice according to xbitlabs.Quote:
Originally Posted by computersmsa
Athlon 64 3000+ (ADA3000BPBOX)
Athlon 64 3200+ (ADA3200BPBOX)
Athlon 64 3500+ (ADA3500BPBOX)
Yes :)
BP is Venice
AS not :)
ADA3500ASBOX 2200MHz 512KB 1.40V 90nm 67W 70° C Venice 0.31
ADA3800ASBOX 2400MHz 512KB 1.40V 90nm 89W 70° C Venice 0.31
What does the increase in wattage between the 3500+ and the 3800+ indicate? Is it increased thermal leakage at speeds above 2.2ghz?
This store is idiot ... (Steg.ch)
Don't look what he write ...
We're all idiots compared to Venice.Quote:
Originally Posted by computersmsa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holst
we still need to see what his 3500+ venice does. I guess Venice runs so cool that better cooling just doesnt help much as they arent heat limited at all! I did get away just fine with my winny and stock cooling and its only slightly warm at 2.6GHz and 1.58v too! I was thinking of getting a prometeia cheap from my friend but for 200MHz it just isnt worth it! Hopefully the fx57 diego scales better since it has more cache, higher clocks=more heat. We have seen 3.5GHz with cascade on fx55s, no reason not to see north of 3GHz or even 4GHz with those fx57 monsters. I still think amd is saving their best silcon for the diegos. what we saw with a venice may just be a warmup compared to what we could see with diego :slobber:
hopefully... hopefully :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
though don't forget that the turions fall into this binning mess too.
the turions look v promising with thier 1mb cache
agreed with geforceti
all the .09 512kb didnt gain much with my machII its disappointing because see some ppl hitting the spot 2,9-3,0ghz with water or good air and if they only could bench 1M spi.
so my old 3700+ clocks as well 2,8 and all the winchesters i got wasnt that good (lower cache compared) or got a bad mem. controller or died in sudden death i ll definetly get rid of them and save the money for a 1024kb cpu like FX55 or maybe 4000+ (or what comes next) because this isnt it worth @ all....
seEn
I wouldn't be so quick to pass judgement ;) Here's my FX55 @ 291x11 -Quote:
Originally Posted by andL64
http://img203.exs.cx/img203/4040/291x117rr.jpg
BTW this thread is linked on Overclockers.com frontpage today :toast:
And here's the 3800+ @ 290x11 -
http://img86.exs.cx/img86/4919/11x290m29153cu.jpg
Not bad @ half the price :D
wow ! great work !