Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
I also VOTE FOR A STICKY! :D :thumbsup:
Printable View
Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
I also VOTE FOR A STICKY! :D :thumbsup:
Hamster!!!! You lazy pet :lol:Quote:
Originally posted by FlyingHamster
I think there is something seriously wrong with your setup.Quote:
Originally posted by Dani
Abit NF7-S ver2.0,
Barton2500+@2793MHz (232.75 x 12),
2x256mb KHX PC3000 BH5,
Sapphire 9800Pro@XT (516/375), Cat3.9,
Watercooled CPU/NB&VPU, watertemp +3c
..my old score, should try again with Dry Ice;)
22449
I get 20,045 points with my mobile barton at 2.6ghz (12x217) on a 9800pro clocked at 439/365. Looking at your setup one would think it would get atleast 24k or higher. I bet your gpu is crapping out at those clocks which can cause errors and give you a poor score.
Not at least 24k... that's nonsense. I needed 260fsb and 2.87Ghz to break it and that was done with everything enabled... (clocks on r350 equal)Quote:
Originally posted by The Virus
I think there is something seriously wrong with your setup.
I get 20,045 points with my mobile barton at 2.6ghz (12x217) on a 9800pro clocked at 439/365. Looking at your setup one would think it would get atleast 24k or higher. I bet your gpu is crapping out at those clocks which can cause errors and give you a poor score.
He surely has APIC disabled to get this kinda clocks with the NF7! That's where the points have gone...
that score looks spot on for that systemQuote:
Originally posted by The Virus
I think there is something seriously wrong with your setup.
I get 20,045 points with my mobile barton at 2.6ghz (12x217) on a 9800pro clocked at 439/365. Looking at your setup one would think it would get atleast 24k or higher. I bet your gpu is crapping out at those clocks which can cause errors and give you a poor score.
I had 20100 with a Mobile Barton @ 11.5x218 and 412/365 clocks :)
Well then i guess i was wrong. I figured 2.8ghz on a barton with a decent fsb of 232 and gpu running at 516mhz would score more then 22k. Then it came to my mind to realize how powerfull the A64 fx53 939 pin is considering it gets 22k with stock 2.4ghz and default 9800 xt compared to 2.8ghz barton using 516mhz gpu speeds. Now i wonder how much it would take for the barton to score 22k using stock fsb of 200 and default speeds of xt........im guessing 3ghz would equal fx53 in 01 ......what are your thoughts?Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
Not at least 24k... that's nonsense. I needed 260fsb and 2.87Ghz to break it and that was done with everything enabled... (clocks on r350 equal)
He surely has APIC disabled to get this kinda clocks with the NF7! That's where the points have gone...
Hmm. Dunno... 3GHz is a very inaccurate if you don't mention fsb speeds... I saw a lot of peeps doing 3G, but mostly with fsb < 210/220 and that's another story compared to the bandwidth of 260MHz max timings and settings!
I would say I can compete with an FX53 at stock, but nothing more, and my system is helluvan XP ;)
So don't underestimate the real power of an FX!!!
The bandwidth is amazing and its design is by far more effective... integreated mem controller reduces latencies by a huge margin :D
@Garrett... :lol: ;)
What art thou laughing at? :(Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
Hmm. Dunno... 3GHz is a very inaccurate if you don't mention fsb speeds... I saw a lot of peeps doing 3G, but mostly with fsb < 210/220 and that's another story compared to the bandwidth of 260MHz max timings and settings!
I would say I can compete with an FX53 at stock, but nothing more, and my system is helluvan XP ;)
So don't underestimate the real power of an FX!!!
The bandwidth is amazing and its design is by far more effective... integreated mem controller reduces latencies by a huge margin :D
@Garrett... :lol: ;)
Shouldst thou not take thine system with thee and score over 26k... yes thou shouldst :rolleyes: :slobber:
I am not laughing at your score, you must know :)Quote:
Originally posted by Garrett
What art thou laughing at? :(
Shouldst thou not take thine system with thee and score over 26k... yes thou shouldst :rolleyes: :slobber:
I only remember the really funny talk we had on MSN :lol: :D
/edit. How's your MCW50-T going? Any results yet? :)
Well it helps... I get 500 artifactfree but higher than 510 isn't a success ;)
I have a bad core I guess, although it's a 360.
I'll probably mod the mem as well this week, maybe next week, and then retry a couple of benches, gotta hit 7500 3dmark03 points :D
7371 is simply not enough ;)
Nice :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally posted by Garrett
Well it helps... I get 500 artifactfree but higher than 510 isn't a success ;)
I have a bad core I guess, although it's a 360.
I'll probably mod the mem as well this week, maybe next week, and then retry a couple of benches, gotta hit 7500 3dmark03 points :D
7371 is simply not enough ;)
How much volt do ya feed it?
2.00v but I haven't tried higher (yet)
It just seems strange that (very) few people get 500 core unmodded and not me ;)
based on what i've been seeing/experiencing, r360 cores should be avoided. r360 cored 9800pro isn't the card to play with. r350 core can mop the hell out of the r360 cores in days and nights. :)
I would highly avoid it. Try to get a descent r350 core. They appreciate supercooling and vmodding more.
Or an XT pcb'ed 256MB ddr2 9800pro ;)
yes... that too. :)
=)
Gotta agree with that, I love my r350 Pro, I'm waiting on a CM Hyper 6 to come through so I can bolt it on my card and voltmod the hell out of it :D 455/400 without mods or decent cooling, I got a mint card :toast:Quote:
Originally posted by IamAnoobieCheez
based on what i've been seeing/experiencing, r360 cores should be avoided. r360 cored 9800pro isn't the card to play with. r350 core can mop the hell out of the r360 cores in days and nights. :)
I would highly avoid it. Try to get a descent r350 core. They appreciate supercooling and vmodding more.
Still have to bench this system with my new CPU, I know 22k is in the bag but it's so damn hot over here in the UK right now...:rolleyes:
oh wait that's very good statements. that is very precise too. i second that...Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
Not at least 24k... that's nonsense. I needed 260fsb and 2.87Ghz to break it and that was done with everything enabled... (clocks on r350 equal)
He surely has APIC disabled to get this kinda clocks with the NF7! That's where the points have gone...
I'm not too happy about my 360 core indeed :D
Well I'm just gonna vmod the mem and then see what benchmark results I can get... in november we've got this huge computer expo so I'll just get me the x800pro or xt :thumbsup:
Thief 3 is really not very smooth you see :D
i'll second the r350 cores being great. Mine could do 500 on air but i didnt run it at that speed to often, think with a pelt it would have been killa.
and Kameleon it is stupidly hot right now aint it, well nice but not got for computers
Thx pal :)Quote:
Originally posted by IamAnoobieCheez
oh wait that's very good statements. that is very precise too. i second that...
I appreciate that.
I've been working hard for that score... it's lots of modding, cooling, bios tweaking and software tweaking as well...
Everbody thinks: ah, he's got 25k+, okay then 24k should be easy... but everybody trying to squeeze out the last bit of performance to break a specific score knows what it means getting another 100pts :D
Thx
SAE
True that, I've had 22044, 22019, 22003, 22000, 22033, 22039 and 22056...
So it's kind of hard to get 22k1 lol
That's why I must mod the mem :)
it's 2.93v standard... should I aim for... 3.3?
Try it, bud. Though uwackme claimed the hynix does not like the voltages... :(Quote:
Originally posted by Garrett
True that, I've had 22044, 22019, 22003, 22000, 22033, 22039 and 22056...
So it's kind of hard to get 22k1 lol
That's why I must mod the mem :)
it's 2.93v standard... should I aim for... 3.3?
Very true Indeed.... A lot of effort involved, the sheer ability of being to bench @ 264fsb on the infinity is a great achievment...Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
Everbody thinks: ah, he's got 25k+, okay then 24k should be easy... but everybody trying to squeeze out the last bit of performance to break a specific score knows what it means getting another 100pts :D
SAE
Hehe. Thx.... :DQuote:
Originally posted by phobix
Very true Indeed.... A lot of effort involved, the sheer ability of being to bench @ 264fsb on the infinity is a great achievment...
I think you're trying to break the 24k barrier too, huh? ;)
You'll get it done. I know. Sooner or later. Maybe with my 3dmark guide (Gaz' and mine ;) ) later... dunno when I get access to it and when I've got time to refresh it... ;)