Thank u guys :)
@dinos22 great score :up:
Printable View
Thank u guys :)
@dinos22 great score :up:
Lookin good dinos, give it a whirl at 4000 flat or below if possible. :cool:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...o-IGN/slow.jpg
MSI ftw right? :rolleyes:
improved:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...IGN/faster.jpg
:down:
this is why i am not a fan of 1M...between these two setups in 32M there is almost 3 seconds difference. with 1M, not even a tenth. that, and i don't really think i have a great OS setup for 1M benching...might have to work on that.
500*8 / 1000MHz 8-7-6 / PL6 = 12.500
click for full size including Memset...
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...0_1000-1sm.png
571*7 / 914MHz 7-6-5 / PL8 = 12.500
click for full size including Memset...
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...71_914-1sm.png
Yeah, that's the nature of 1M. What if you bring the second one to 4000MHz flat? The 3 MHz is significant.
Systool allows really really fine adjustments. (close to 1 MHz CPU speed) I never tried it on Asus P35 boards but it should work I would think.
Asus maximus formula se
intel qx9650 extreme
g.skill 8500 hz
new score
http://rol-co.nl/hwi/york4ghz.jpg
Or is the new 45nm not allowed ;) :D
OK, 45nm :).
Unfortunately not much tweaked, I had no time [more than month ago ;)].
http://pclab.pl/zdjecia/artykuly/JMK...%20zabawie.JPG
New score :D
Qx9650 extreme
maximus formula se
2gb g.skill pc8500Hz
windows xp pro sp3
http://82.173.172.10/Rol-Co/11234.JPG
sub 45k eff with ddr2 :p:
any reason why my 12.468 run isn't on the first page?
It was too far above 4000MHz...at first I was letting within 5MHz range, but later some people didn't want me to, and after trying it out myself, 4003-4005MHz is much much easier than 4000 flat. It can easily help a tick. There are plenty of 4005MHz times that I had to omit too for this reason. Just trying to keep everyone happy.
Gautam
should it not be x38 chipset instead of P35??
blitz has p35 but maximus x38
meh that time wasn't good enough anyways
wait till i really put the hammer down :D
i've got one CPU coming in soon which i will try to bench at 666*6 with DDR3 heheheh
with LN2 it should be just able to get there....we'll see hehehhehe
you reckon sub 12.4 would be achievable :)
4000 mhz score 12.516
http://i10.tinypic.com/7xtn9j9.png
next time mijn QX9650
3.6GHz, practically 14s dead on CL5..:)
E6750@3600MHz, Corsair Dominator @1128MHz 5-5-4-5-2T@2.23V, XP SP2
14.015s
http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/8...em56nr7.th.jpg
valid:
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=293749
Now some sub14's with heavy tweaks coming.
here ya go first time i post
http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z.../125154Mhz.jpg
12..515 s
For m first post on the forums i guess it's a pretty good one :)
Here is my score after months of tweaking windows ...
http://www.picture.biz/files/c3iq1cuhzp1gbapj168q.jpg
E6850
DFI LP LT X38
Crucial Ballistix PC8500
Holy crap :eek: 2:3 divider?? daamnn...
mems @ 1420 mhz ;)
months of tweaking windows, yet you have a wallpaper?....
Tim maybe the wallpaper helps him or it doesn't harm the bench
maybe he applies the theme after bench is done
one thing is for sure that result is VERY good so he looks like knows what he's doing to me :)
i personally think it's the RAM speed that's helping a lot there :)
on what divider i dunno ... i have different option in bios and don't botther calculating it coz i suck @ it ... one thing is for sure, wallpaper or no wallpaper, the result stays the same my friend, try it out ;)
and yes, it's the mem that give the result, @ 600mhz or 666mhz i had no lower then 12.500 but finally havin ballistix got me to 1420mhz ... 1 run, 1screen, en boom basta crash