The GT300/Fermi Thread - Part 2!

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-15-2010, 04:46 AM
Picao84

Quote:

Originally Posted by annihilat0r

What does Charlie know about the architecture that he can say it's the architecture that is botched and causing all the problems ? Maybe it just needs more time to be designed efficiently. If Nvidia engineers made a decision to go some way, well it can be the wrong way to go, but it can't be so bad as to not allow for the development of a decent graphics chip.

After all he had put the GF100's at the WORST possible light, saying that they are broken and completely unmanufacturable, but here is Nvidia (or TSMC), actually manufacturing the chips. Nothing can be THAT bad.

Notice the little "(im playing devils advocate here :p)".. Im far from being a Charlie Zealot.. On the contrary :yepp:
03-15-2010, 06:56 AM
mindfury

GTX4X0 3Dmark06 benchmark leak:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...3DMark2006.jpg

http://www1.uwants.com/viewthread.php?tid=9547178
03-15-2010, 07:01 AM
annihilat0r

1600mhz memory?

Means little with 0mhz core, though :p
03-15-2010, 07:05 AM
ethomaz

Hummmm

The GPU-Z now will display GPC Clock or ROPs Clock in the "GPU Core Clock"? :confused:
03-15-2010, 07:05 AM
Marios

Rumors...

Code:

470 480 480U GTX 448 480 512 Cuda Cores 56 60 64 TMUs 40 48 48 ROPs 1280 1536 1536 MiB 320 384 384 Bit GDDR5 225 250 270 Watt TDP

So it seems Nvidia did reduce the TDP. It's 250W for the version with 480 cuda cores.
03-15-2010, 07:06 AM
annihilat0r

Where are these rumors from ?

I don't think they are correct. TDP difference should be more between 470 and 480.
03-15-2010, 07:10 AM
Arxagelos

gpu temprature 34c and the fan in 79%??? wtf?
03-15-2010, 07:12 AM
-Sweeper_

Quote:

Originally Posted by mindfury

GTX4X0 3Dmark06 benchmark leak:

http://www1.uwants.com/viewthread.php?tid=9547178

is it GTX470 or GTX480?
03-15-2010, 07:16 AM
mindfury

Quote:

Originally Posted by -Sweeper_

is it GTX470 or GTX480?

Unknown....
03-15-2010, 07:26 AM
mao5

Quote:

Originally Posted by -Sweeper_

is it GTX470 or GTX480?

480

GTX4803DMark2006.jpg
03-15-2010, 07:32 AM
ajaidev

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marios

Rumors...

Code:

470 480 480U GTX 448 480 512 Cuda Cores 56 60 64 TMUs 40 48 48 ROPs 1280 1536 1536 MiB 320 384 384 Bit GDDR5 225 250 270 Watt TDP

So it seems Nvidia did reduce the TDP. It's 250W for the version with 480 cuda cores.

:rolleyes:

Those TDP looks mighty small special considering that overclocked 480's are suppose to be 305W.
03-15-2010, 07:35 AM
-=DVS=-

The bad thing is its SLI score not single card.
03-15-2010, 07:39 AM
kemo

Quote:

Originally Posted by mao5

480

GTX4803DMark2006.jpg

No way that the 480 will come with 800MHZ memory effective clock ,, and it shows 512 Core :rolleyes:
03-15-2010, 07:47 AM
Marios

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajaidev

:rolleyes:

Those TDP looks mighty small special considering that overclocked 480's are suppose to be 305W.

Overclocked version? :confused:
03-15-2010, 07:54 AM
ajaidev

Quote:

Originally Posted by -=DVS=-

The bad thing is its SLI score not single card.

Actually 3DMark06 does not work very well with CF config's, my pal has 5870 CF and together score around 204xx and a single card scores around 19xxx at 1920*1200.

If this is dual SLi i am a bit impressed and if Nvidia is not using any dirty tricks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marios

Overclocked version? :confused:

http://vr-zone.com/forums/580572/one...umes-305w.html
03-15-2010, 08:23 AM
annihilat0r

According to those news (which have all originated from a DH article) the GTX 480 will be 298W TDP in its stock version
03-15-2010, 08:30 AM
-=DVS=-

Edit: Actually it might be single card , CPUZ and GPUZ display single and multi cards differently. :doh:
03-15-2010, 09:09 AM
jaredpace

Does anyone have a 5870 that can run that 3dmark 06 pro benchmark, so that we may make a comparison? (stock 5870, 4.2ghz i7, 1920x1200, features tests) Thanks.
03-15-2010, 09:20 AM
Olivon

According to overclockers club (not my favorite review site ...), a 5870 with 3GHz 920 scores around 20000 pts.

But this site isn't top reliablity IMHO ...
03-15-2010, 09:24 AM
HelixPC

Who cares about 3dmark06, i dont play 3dmark06, lets see some Battlefield Bad Company 2 benchies, since its the hottest game right now, lets see some DX11 comparison's with 5870 :up:
03-15-2010, 09:26 AM
NaMcO

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaredpace

Does anyone have a 5870 that can run that 3dmark 06 pro benchmark, so that we may make a comparison? (stock 5870, 4.2ghz i7, 1920x1200, features tests) Thanks.

I don't have a 5870 but this might help...

http://www.tech-caffe.com/gfx/3dm06.jpg

http://www.tech-caffe.com/gfx/3dm06_5970.jpg

EDIT: I noticed only now that the test is at 1920x1200 wtf??? Either too much speed to be true or the video card is a BLAST!
03-15-2010, 09:30 AM
Chickenfeed

Here you go. I will try to get this thing running with turbo and HT but I've always ran without (so far It appears I'll need over .75v more just for HT and 200Hz, not worth it... anyways) as appart from benching and AV work, its pointless ( I am a gamer not a bencher )

This was ran with the system in my sig ( same clocks / relavent info ) using Catalyst 10.3 previews.

http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/2...8709255ghz.jpg

Look at the feature test numbers that are visible... quite interesting.
03-15-2010, 09:30 AM
jaredpace

@ Namco and Chickenfeed: Thanks!
03-15-2010, 09:32 AM
Gaul

@ mindfury = VANTAGE Please !
03-15-2010, 09:33 AM
Olivon

@NaMcO : Resolution is 1920X1080 on mindfury's link.

I'm not really sure that GPU-Z 0.3.9 supports Fermi's models though ... W1zzard, a comment, maybe ? :D

edit : Thanks Chickenfeed :up:

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page