I'm still hoping all these leaks are fake. as it is right now I'm better off with a second 6870.
Printable View
I'm still hoping all these leaks are fake. as it is right now I'm better off with a second 6870.
For the lazy , this is how it looks in mark 11. Hard to believe.
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/8066/testig.jpg
Some data to compare with in 3DMark 11:
http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/7931/tabelp.jpg
:shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
Physics score is really bad for X6 OC :shrug:
4D shaders? While 5xxx cards and 6xxx cards use 5D.Quote:
Originally Posted by bl4ckdr4g00n
Very disappointment 3D Mark results, if true.
Don't even hit 5k-epic fail!
Indeed, this Guy at 3DC has more Physics score with a 3,2 GHz Thuban then the Guy with the 4,2 GHz Thuban. Seems the OC is unstabe :brick:Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
But if you compare the "GraphicsTest1" and GraphicsTest2" results of the 3DMark11 Screen to those of a GTX 580 you can see that they are not that much off. "GraphicsTest1" is about 10% slower then a regular GTX 580 and "GraphicsTest2" is as fast as a GTX580.
Did he flick that switch yet? Wonder if that will do anything (desperate hope).
low physics score is due to ram clocks according to the owner of the card
Very bad!
580 crackin 6k easy and my 5970 scored 6.7k on stock clock(i7 930).
Even 5870 not far behind!
no suprise 10.11 doesnt even have support for Barts let alone Cayman.. who cares 3dmark11 if it performs well at games..
What about somebody tell that german guy to bench some real games?
Yes, that Ducati guy also posted some 3Dmark results and the guys on that German forum are not happy with them at all ...
8.790 = bad
8.801 Dec 8 :yepp:
http://img571.imageshack.us/img571/261/96904816.jpg
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/1397/19324258.jpg
link
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=62SAYMCZ
So far, the reviewers hint at the exact opposite though. Good in 3DMark 11, but slower in games.Quote:
Originally Posted by kaktus1907
P4939 3DMarks
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/134696
X1776 3DMarks
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/135040
someone with a thuban at this clocks and a 5870 or 68xx care to share his 3dmark11 score?
*edit* futuremark's database/orb search engine still is the worst i've ever seen. it isn't even able to distinct multi gpu and single gpu setups. i feel offended searching the db for comparable results :p:
Extreme is above 480/570 , but Performance is below. Weird.
better than GTX 480/570
http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/4526/3dm11extreme.png
care to elaborate to which scores you compare them to? i have the feeling that the performance score is cpu limited on the thuban, even if it is clocked at 4,25ghz.Quote:
Originally Posted by -=DVS=-
especially if i compare them to the scores from computerbase.de (http://www.computerbase.de/news/hard...-im-vergleich/), where the 580 scores p6096. they used a i7-965ee clocked at 3,87ghz.
Heaven 2.1 with tessellation Extreme @ 1920x1080 Everything 8xAA/16xAF maximum
http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/1...enbench.th.jpg