dernoQuote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
Printable View
dernoQuote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
specs look like legit but the slide is probably fake :ROTF: seriously what happened to chinese 'we don't care about nda spirit' :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by SpuTnicK
so apparently amd decided to flip a switch that screws everything up for their next card?Quote:
Originally Posted by SpuTnicK
so say the chinese and fud.
wonder what charlie is saying about cayman.
How about this :D :Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimitriman
Oh my :)Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie
LOLL this thread has become ridiculous
As Mr Dylan said it nicely lol :DQuote:
"There must be some way out of here," said the joker to the thief,
"There's too much confusion, I can't get no relief.
Oh yeah and : "No reason to get excited" :D
this was a joke - charlies way to say that the 1536-1920 switch idea is completely ridicolousQuote:
Originally Posted by informal
6970
http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community...0-post170.html
http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/1...schlsse.th.jpg http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/3028/6970back.th.jpg http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/3112/6970ma.th.jpg http://img571.imageshack.us/img571/534/6970oben.th.jpg http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/1...0rechts.th.jpg http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/6...70vorne.th.jpg
speaking german is clearly an advantage in the next few hours :D;)
The 1 million dollar question is: can it reach 1000Mhz on gpu at stock volts and of course can it play Crysis maxed out? :)
And for those who do not there is always google translate. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by johnieboy
Sexy looking card, btw. Time for the guy to actually leak the specs! :D
Well, or at least some decent pictures of the box... :p:
theres no "slow speed board" sticker on it. yeah! :p
1600?
GPU-z must be wrong
http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/3925/gpuzko.jpg
gpu-z:
http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community...l#post15864110
from the same guy as the photos above.
however, i think gpu-z doesn't detect the proper data yet.
*edit*
bl4ckdr4g00n beat me to it. i'm getting old and slow :p:
That means gtx570 gonna screw HD6970 in 3Dmark Vantage
3dmark is not everything.
But some what disappointed.
http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/8...9763093102.jpg
It is said to hit 950/1450. dunno about Crysis yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by halfwaythere
Vantage sucks, it loves Nvidia, it uses PhysX (you can still disable it, I know).Quote:
Originally Posted by bl4ckdr4g00n
It is really no longer valid as a gaming benchmark.
We need some DX11 benches, anyway.
3DMark 11:
http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/2...703dmark11.jpg
6970 3DMark11 Performance
http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/2...dmark11.th.jpg
Too slow. :p:
He was linked the new drivers, perhaps he will give them a try. These seem a bit old.
Hmmm, i am disappointed, i expected more shaders. 6870 crossfire is a better buy, if you have 2 slots open.
Is those results are true, then... wtf lol, that's like 10% better than a 6870, judging from this review: http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...-review-9.html
So what happened to that 40% faster ? if it doesn't do better in games its fail.
believe meQuote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
no kind of driver could solve that distance:down:
If its price and performance match GTX 580 it's not more fail than GTX 580, right? It's not like this card came out one year after 580 or anything.
This is a brand new architecture, remember that. And he uses a driver that's been released more than 2 weeks before the release of both the benchmark he runs and the card he uses.Quote:
Originally Posted by bl4ckdr4g00n
Well, the performance seems to be quite far from it, judging these results.Quote:
Originally Posted by hurrdurr
http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/8481/3dmark11poc.jpg
:shakes::shakes: