hehe
dual 32M time
@16x216HTT = 3456Mhz
DDR466 upclock
2x 512MB OCZ PC3200 Gold UTT BH-5 @246mhz 2-2-2-5 at 3.48v
click image for full screenie
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL..._22m13s_tn.png
Printable View
hehe
dual 32M time
@16x216HTT = 3456Mhz
DDR466 upclock
2x 512MB OCZ PC3200 Gold UTT BH-5 @246mhz 2-2-2-5 at 3.48v
click image for full screenie
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL..._22m13s_tn.png
http://82.110.105.22/drunken-student.../yonah_32m.JPG
Need to work out why this chips now bugging at 235 (same chip as wwwww did his run with...)
@Rammie, updated..thanks.
@eva2000, nice clock there I'm opening a dual core catagory.
@Highland3r, welcome and nice job. (crap, I had to d-check I thought I wrote it down wrong!!)
**If I left something out, pm me. I'll correct or update.
:D Yes, I know...it's a crappy result for that speed, but I was just happy that it finished...:p:
http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/2...5x1332m0yd.jpg
is that good for 20.xxx section ?
http://forum.overclocklab.net/images...32M_20m34s.JPG
@CapFTP, it certainly is.
Nice stephen, sub 16m cat. added.
this thread makes no sense coop...........if you look at the first page the info is irrelevant as you've got different manufacturers' CPUs and models with only MHz listed...........i think you need to start making distinctions
just correct my time please....it's 20:34 not 20.54..Quote:
Originally Posted by coop
:D:D
THnx
@dinos22, "*P" is for Intel...there was not so many at the begining.
@CapFTP, done sorry. I like that processor. Nice time in hwbot for 1m.
LOL...i thought I could take 2nd place..but it's ordered by frequency...LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by coop
well....more or less is FOR SALE...if really like it..:toast:
20.XX [IMG]http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/501/p10500747uw.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/3...00688fy.th.jpg[/IMG]
interesting change on things..very interesting...
http://82.110.105.22/drunken-student...h/32m_1936.JPG
Bit quicker :D
oh the good old 32M challenge thread.................this has to be the best idea of all here
here's my allendale sub 14m time (it's not really fair against AMD maybe we should start a new thread)
http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/133...7187swmqn3.jpg
yup 13min 56s at 3600mhz
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W...6s422ms_tn.png
oh, I totally forgot about this one! I got my E6600/P5B Dx on Friday and will join you guys for "below 14m" challenge. I'm kind of stuck with stock cooler for now, and it maxes my C2D at 3.6GHz, 32M stable... I will update this post tonight with circa 3.52-3.55GHz screen :D
EDIT:Ok, I lied... :lol:Quote:
I will update this post tonight with circa 3.52-3.55GHz screen :D
Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 377x9=3392Mhz, Corsair 6400C3 @ DDR2-1130 5-3-4-4.0 --> 13:57.485
vdimm: 2.45v (BIOS) --> 2.47v (DMM)
:toast:
i think i wet my pants :eek:
Below 14min, thats 3500mhz or something? :D
Givin' it a shot after the second one... - Just gonna make a dual 32M.
EDIT:
Damnit Bachus, now your givin' us a hell of a time competing.. :|
Nice bachus better ram + high vdimm = :cool: pi times :D
Realtime, affinity, and, are you sure you performed copy-waza correctly? - I didnt and wondered what the hell... Then I asked the master himself (Kyosen), and now it helps quite a bit..
Are you using 500mhz as well? ;)
EDIT:
Win2k3 was better due memtweaks, right? - But this aint A64, so I actually think winXP will do slightly better...
There's no way I can match Bachus with the screwiness of the board/mem combo, but, perhaps 1:1 isn't that much worse than 4:5 when tuned properly? :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
I wish I could try to compare your second one but my board starts getting unstable at 410MHz FSB. :cry:
bah key to your times is tRD = 5 ;)
anyway new cpus are fun :D
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W...in41s671ms.png
tRD 5 is really worth that much eh?
I was having a feeling it perhaps was the "Standard" memory parameter?
That's another thing to keep in mind, if running 4:5 takes so much loosening, is it really worth it?
Enjoy the extra multi. :p: