*kissing FUGGERs shoes* :D
Printable View
*kissing FUGGERs shoes* :D
No 2 Stage is Better, if it's made right :DQuote:
Originally Posted by dpa
Here You are 22 sek no patch only FX power ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Hilppa
and -125 C load
WOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW congrats!!!!!!!!! :slobber:
You are greatttttttttttttttttttttttttt
New World RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
try a 8M, cpumark, 3dmark
:slobber: :slobber: :slobber:
Dont forget this link my friend :toast:
http://www16.big.or.jp/~bunnywk/
Whoa WR shweet dude!
Done!Quote:
Originally Posted by cpulloverclock
more comming :toast:
nice job that's officialQuote:
Originally Posted by Tom Holck
if someone gets 22s, you'll always be the #1
22s :eek: congrats :D
:toast:
:D:D:D
congrats Tom, scandinavia still going strong
congrats Tom! Respect!
GREAT TOM!!!
THIS VERY NICE WR!!!
FUGGER i don't understand your "i has bad core"... ???
Incredible! Both Fuggers clocks and Toms! :D
FUGGER needs 21sek now...!!
Intel POWER!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D
normally Intel can do the same score at 5.8-6GHz with the S775 (bad perf)Quote:
Originally Posted by dpa
Damn tom, mad clocks. Shoot for 4ghz now ;)
Amazing. Congratulations.
Congrats Tom :) I wanna see fugger's 22 or 21s
Sorry was away for most of the weekend.
Awesome job Tom.
3 stage > 2 stage, cant wait to see you make the transition.
According to the site, someone on A64 just broke 21s..
fake, there was a 19s but deleted, 21s is always postedQuote:
Originally Posted by Mag Master 21
congrat FUGGER, i'm waiting u to go farther
nice job FUGGER,
by the way, this is the first time I saw an 875 chipset with a lga775.
DFI supports you :)
so who comes 1st with a 21sec? tom??? fugger??? the japs???
im waitin we are all :slobber: :slobber: :slobber: and waiting :D
Excuse me, but why are you calling my SuperPI patch crap?Quote:
Originally Posted by macci
Just curious...
Cos it makes it impossible to compare results w/ the original SuperPi? Cos the patched version only works on Prescott? Cos it makes Prescott look better than it actually is? :D
You should have clearly renamed the software to Prescott-SuperPi (or SuperPi 1.1 or sumthing). That way it would have been easier to see which version of SuperPi was used and it would be easier to compare results.
Just personal thoughts nothing more.
Nice to see what the prescott can do once the software is optimized for it thou.