and they work, got a little Photo from the Tyan here:
Printable View
and they work, got a little Photo from the Tyan here:
Hurry up man!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :slobber:Quote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
Well I'm off to Los Angeles Cascade to put this FX-51 under some -100c cooling:D
We'll see if she clocks any better;)
see ya,
OPP
Anabolic is back publishing some fake scores.
Check the ORB out. :rolleyes:
150 FPS Car High from a P4 whatever @ 3.9 GHz. :rolleyes:
He ought to change his quote to " Let them either sigh with disbelief or fall about laughing ..."Quote:
Originally posted by Hallowed
Anabolic is back publishing some fake scores.
Check the ORB out. :rolleyes:
150 FPS Car High from a P4 whatever @ 3.9 GHz. :rolleyes:
He lives near to me in SE England. Might have to track him down with my A-team style van and sort out that "sucka "
Regards
BA
I've never quite understood peeps who hack Futuremark...
Wouldn't a smart person hack something like this??:
FX-51 @ 3160 @ 2.05V
9800XT @ 621/463 @ 2.25V
30,873
Car Low - 425.6
Car High - 156.0
Drago Low - 531.8
Drago Hi - 291.5
Lobby Low - 405.6
Lobby Hi - 185.7
Nature 191.2
Wouldn't that be more believable? Instead we have these boneheads trying their P4/800 + 9800Pro = 29K bs... lol
No respect for a hacker who doesn't even hack well...
C
The ones that are that smart are occupied with other matters I believe.
I think he has bugged drivers and/or windows that gets him repeatable results several thousand higher than normal. he should be banned from futuremark anyway
I want a true proof
VIVA AMD!HAHA!
Thanks Charlie, I do believeJBELL used this avatar at one point.
He must be near me too then! I wish to join the A-Team!Quote:
Originally posted by zakelwe
He ought to change his quote to " Let them either sigh with disbelief or fall about laughing ..."
He lives near to me in SE England. Might have to track him down with my A-team style van and sort out that "sucka "
Regards
BA
OPP, you are the god of overclocking
OUTSTANDING OPP! !:toast: :up: :rocker:
Are you gonna get some of those RAM waterblocks and give that RAM some chilled love?
Along with your -100c Cascade set up, WOW +31K+?
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7282110
??? 30k ???
Radeon 9100 ?!
its not FUGGER, read the email address qarefully. ;)Quote:
Originally posted by NoOne
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7282110
??? 30k ???
Radeon 9100 ?!
I see.. but.. sux isnt it/
I wonder where opp and fugger are. I also wonder if anyone else will break 30k or has opp set the 30k bar for the rest of this year?
i doubt fugger would sit back and let opp take the lead like this for THAT long... i expect both fugger and macci to hit 30k by new years eve.
fugger maxed out his cpu and video. Macci has a much better chance though if he can get higher than the 590/450 hes at now and raise his fsb even more :D If fuggers p4ee was gonna get 30k he woulda have done it before opp beat him to the 30k race. 30k is gonna be very, very hard until the r420 comes out
no, fuggers p4ee is far from done... he didnt even try with the lower multipliers...
think about what he could do at higher FSB's... ;)
If I remember correctly, I recall Fugger saying he wont change the multiplier in order to compete on even grounds and not have people cry "unfair" since how many people are lucky to have an engineering sample? Hes a good sport too. The only thing I can think of is if he can find ram thatll run 1:1 with his cpu to 4.48GHz at like 278fsb
yea, i could see if he was #1 saying that... but he isnt #1 anymore. i say he go all out... go for the 12x360+. i mean, wouldnt that be incredable to see a p4ee at 1300-1450mhz bus? ;)
i dont think anyone who calls him/herself part of the overclocking community should even think of crying unfairness... just because we arent in the same posistion as FUGGER, doesnt mean he cant use his full potential. or else, whats the point of him getting a P4EE/ES in the first place?
i for one would rather see him get 30000+ scores, then see any "fairness" stuff. if we want to get into fairness, then everyone should be using air/water cooling only...
its ubsard. though, noble for him to do, completely unnecessary. h*ll, im gonna start a poll to see if people want FUGGER to use multipliers...
Fugger took a couple weeks off for comdex....
Complete tear down and rebuild... for display booth....
Planning for CES (Consumer Electronics Show)
-100c on the FX but no benching. Contact to the core was messed up.
Gunna try a new mounting style next week and see what happens.
OPP
"Contact to the core was messed up." = 3201Quote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
-100c on the FX but no benching. Contact to the core was messed up.
Gunna try a new mounting style next week and see what happens.
OPP
LOL!!!
Good contact = 3400 ? 3500 ?
Charlie, i've heard this for a long time. Anybody wanna prove it ?Quote:
Originally posted by charlie
napalmV5,
The limitation of the Radeon 9XXX memory subsystem is NOT the DDR chip...it's the PCB itself and even 1.0nS DDR pieces wouldn't help :D
C
Yet, we see 932 mem clocks.