Sorry to get a little off topic with my last post, here's my chip
ADA3200AEP5AP
CAAMC 0342VPBW
9452345J30107
MALAYSIA
Printable View
Sorry to get a little off topic with my last post, here's my chip
ADA3200AEP5AP
CAAMC 0342VPBW
9452345J30107
MALAYSIA
Dude you get the rig running yet.?
you can always stick the spreader back on to play on it.i have stuck my spreader back on mine while i have been testing it is easier when you are taking the evap on and off a dozen times or so.
I had it running on air into the bios. BTW HS/F for 64 coming your way. I picked up one.
Sooner or later I will have to trim the install kit down for permanent installation in the Mach2. I guess I could stick it back on and then do it when I'm not so pressed for time.
I had a hard time finding ram it would boot with consistently. It's a picky :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana:.
If I put it back on, what should I glue it down with and should I put some Alumina in between the die and the spreader? I kind of have mixed feelings about that cause it adds another layer to the mix....maybe a real thin layer?
BTW: soldered the vcore mod back up.
just place a small dab of alumina or something on the die and press it down.then i lift to make sure it has full contact.and then repress it.the alumina will hold it down until the evap head can hold it.Quote:
Originally posted by TheDude
I had it running on air into the bios. BTW HS/F for 64 coming your way. I picked up one.
Sooner or later I will have to trim the install kit down for permanent installation in the Mach2. I guess I could stick it back on and then do it when I'm not so pressed for time.
I had a hard time finding ram it would boot with consistently. It's a picky :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana:.
If I put it back on, what should I glue it down with and should I put some Alumina in between the die and the spreader? I kind of have mixed feelings about that cause it adds another layer to the mix....maybe a real thin layer?
BTW: soldered the vcore mod back up.
you can use black silicone and apply a small amount around the spreader and the reapply it.wipe the excess silicone from around the chip and spreader.let it set a few hours with some pressure applied and it looks like the factory job.
it real easy.
Good idea about letting the tgrease hold it down until I get the evap on it. That way I can trim it to fit later. I should have thought of that. Brain isn't firing on all cylinders right now. ;)
Thanks
Bowman,Quote:
Originally posted by bowman1964
dont feal bad,i have the same problem right now on the gigabyte.excate same problem.
so i pulled it.i figure the board is screwed.
i have been out at the beach so i havent had anytime to work out the ovp mod on the chaintech either.i did get it working on the shuttle so i am pretty sure it will work on the chaintech and gigabyte.i just need some time to test.
and by the way...good clock there OPP.just i am worried even with the higher clock(which i am sure it is from the lower 512kb of cache.)that it wont run with the 3200 or newer 3400,i personally would like to have the 3400 with my ram that will run 1:1 up to 285 should scream.
Are talking about a 3000 chip or are you having the problem with the 3200 chip? I could have sworn I installed w2k with my 3200 chip on this mobo.
Maybe I need a different mobo :D Fricken pain.
And your right, the 3000 doesn't look to great as far as performance compared to a 3200 chip, it reminds me of a Celly vrs P4. Not enough cache, no action.
OPP
I think that W2K needs to be slipstreamed with latest SP, as they don t support A64. Same goes for WinXP. (SP1 is need it) I m not sure though...
well no its not my chip,or not that i think so.i have 2 chips now,and a new 3400 on the way.Quote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
Bowman,
Are talking about a 3000 chip or are you having the problem with the 3200 chip? I could have sworn I installed w2k with my 3200 chip on this mobo.
Maybe I need a different mobo :D Fricken pain.
And your right, the 3000 doesn't look to great as far as performance compared to a 3200 chip, it reminds me of a Celly vrs P4. Not enough cache, no action.
OPP
the gigabyte was working fine.i pulled it down to work on some mods with the shuttle and chaintech.the shuttle would give me super fsb speeds but its 3d proformance wasnt up to the gigabyte.even with only 3500 sandra scores the gigabyte will beat the shuttle that getting 4300 sandra at the same clock(or very close)
so i reset up the gigabyte.first i noticed i couldnt restore a ghost,keep telling me corrupt image so i tryed fresh install.
would load but keep saying was missing files.tried 3 differant w2pro disks.
so it was running perfect but now its gone.strange.
i could try another chip to see.i have a brown week 41 i have that will post 2950 mhz i didnt try that one.
come to think of it i was running the chip you sent me.but i think it is board related.i must of done something to the board.i may try on air and see as soon as i get another heatsink.right now i am out.
New 3400+ chip ?? sounds great :DQuote:
Originally posted by bowman1964
well no its not my chip,or not that i think so.i have 2 chips now,and a new 3400 on the way.
the gigabyte was working fine.i pulled it down to work on some mods with the shuttle and chaintech.the shuttle would give me super fsb speeds but its 3d proformance wasnt up to the gigabyte.even with only 3500 sandra scores the gigabyte will beat the shuttle that getting 4300 sandra at the same clock(or very close)
so i reset up the gigabyte.first i noticed i couldnt restore a ghost,keep telling me corrupt image so i tryed fresh install.
would load but keep saying was missing files.tried 3 differant w2pro disks.
so it was running perfect but now its gone.strange.
i could try another chip to see.i have a brown week 41 i have that will post 2950 mhz i didnt try that one.
come to think of it i was running the chip you sent me.but i think it is board related.i must of done something to the board.i may try on air and see as soon as i get another heatsink.right now i am out.
Chaintech is up and running 3200 with XP on Mach2...doing all the stupid updates and security patches. Glad I have 1.5 down DSL. ;) Mach2 display shows -57 bios shows -9
For those of you that have had a 3000+ and a 3200+, what kind of difference did the cache make?
Quote:
Originally posted by sandman
For those of you that have had a 3000+ and a 3200+, what kind of difference did the cache make?
That's what Opp had to say about it.Quote:
And your right, the 3000 doesn't look to great as far as performance compared to a 3200 chip, it reminds me of a Celly vrs P4. Not enough cache, no action.
I knew it would be less, but if it's really like the celly and P4, maybe the 3200+ is worth it.
If anyone could give me some 3dmark compares It'd really help.
I tried searching, but I couldn't find much on the orb.
Most reviews show a small difference say 5-10% in 3DMark scores, but the real difference will show up once the 64bitness arrives on the marketQuote:
Originally posted by sandman
I knew it would be less, but if it's really like the celly and P4, maybe the 3200+ is worth it.
If anyone could give me some 3dmark compares It'd really help.
I tried searching, but I couldn't find much on the orb.
10% i can't believe that. you do realize with a great setup that could be around a 2500 point loss just cause of half the cache?Quote:
Originally posted by Schneider
Most reviews show a small difference say 5-10% in 3DMark scores, but the real difference will show up once the 64bitness arrives on the market
amd chips have never shown anywhere near willamete -> northwood gains when the cache is increased.
5% loss possibly at more normal user settings.. 10% if you get nearer to 3ghz... maybe?
Do u got any SuperPI results at that speed?Quote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
These 3000 chips are good overclockers. We'll see how they will do against the P4c chips.
OPP
I was wrong about the 3000 chip, I did a clean install of XP and chip seems to run 3D very nicely, I only wish I could get w2k to install. I'll be back with some Stock radeon XT scores.Quote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
Bowman,
Are talking about a 3000 chip or are you having the problem with the 3200 chip? I could have sworn I installed w2k with my 3200 chip on this mobo.
Maybe I need a different mobo :D Fricken pain.
And your right, the 3000 doesn't look to great as far as performance compared to a 3200 chip, it reminds me of a Celly vrs P4. Not enough cache, no action.
OPP
OPP
I curious about the 3dmark 2001 scores because 2001 is more cpu dependent.Quote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
I was wrong about the 3000 chip, I did a clean install of XP and chip seems to run 3D very nicely, I only wish I could get w2k to install. I'll be back with some Stock radeon XT scores.
OPP
Here's my Radeon XT running at stock speeds.
CPU at 288x10,, mem at 240MHz.
This is an easy 29k score if the card was overclocked,,I think:D
OPP
Alright, thanks Opp.
you had me worried about the 3000+ not running 3dmark very well.
Sorry about that, my wrong:)
OPP
haha, no problem.
Damn nice score's OPP :)
23k on stock XT is nice
Running 288fsb on a gigabyte or shuttle?
How much should i could get out of a AMD 64 3400+ ?? Approx ?? :)