Actually, that Ramdisk might be an awesome way to run SPI :D
Printable View
Actually, that Ramdisk might be an awesome way to run SPI :D
Congrats on the WR.
But with a record as significant as SuperPi 1M, nobody is above verification. I don't care if Jesus himself posts an 8.5, healthy skepticism is a good thing on the Internet (for my part, I don't doubt him at all, but the whiny phanboys defending him are just too obnoxious).
The day you think anyone is above proving himself, that's the day you become a phanboy.
FWIW, I think most of the doubters are trying to psych OPB into revealing his tricks, and I say, good! :lol:
BTW, not willing to read 10 pages, what RAM did OPB use?
His own DDR2 TX OPB edition.
BTW, eww @ cat, that's just gross, kittie pr0n.
-Satan
Quote:
Originally Posted by uclajd
Certainly not but you can use the checksum in the very first post if you dont believe it. Thats as far as things needed to go.
I started an optimization file (not finished) with some tweaks, available there
for an 1M run luna.theme + prefetcher=1 is better than a copy waza, I'm sure :)
http://cpull.free.fr/Computer-scienc...timization.rar
Yes, you don't rant for 5 pages and then ask for a checksum that was in the first post :p:
But maybe the italians have been smarter than all of us and they only wanted hints (but again, ONLY if that was the case, I don't know if that's a good way of doing things in a team looking for a WR :stick:)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
Chinese is a difficult language :)
really? here is a way even more awesome that one of the XS great member just remind me.Quote:
Originally Posted by cpulloverclock
check your system.ini, from [386enh]
two varibles you can take the consideration and try:
ConservativeSwapfileUsage and MinTimeSlice;)
I thought taking a picture while its running was good enough validation for the rest of the community, ot has team italy changed the rules now?
Quote:
Originally Posted by [cTx]Philosophy
you know what bro
first of all, I am only by muself, when the moment I ready to do 1m, I need to wait for the pot 's minimum temp which can stand for the speed I set and now add the proper LN2 for system to run the 1m, can't be too much, otherwise, it will be freeze after you finish the run. and ok, now is the problem, I use DSLR, when the timing I power on my Camera and have focus on, (also it's not normal object, so it's hard to give the focus and everything.)
sometimes the 1m already done for running. That's why I said I need several hands. Actually I got several times sub-9s, but when I was ready to capture the screeny, it got freeze due to the temp has raised already....Play LN2 is DAMN hard...lol
congrats!!! :toast:
hope to see some more great results in near future!
i think he got the digicam shot in case the pc crashed before he got a screen :)Quote:
Originally Posted by mattstrike3
I believe that the score is fake coz OPB didn't used our DDR Maximizer to archive it.....:D :toast:
Get him one!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
And throw one in for me!! :)
Hard to believe it? ... YES !!!!
But OPB always make impossible looking just a bad Joke.... :toast:
BTW.. Congrats again my friend and don’t waste your time on some X-Posts..
Focus on your next miracle to come.....:clap:
Thx, it's a Win98 tweak :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
:ROTF: , i bet TeamGroup doesn't let him :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
Amazing OPB:toast:
To the doubtsters...Get your best 6800 then pass this WR.
Don't just wasting time.
Dumo -san,
Thank you for ALWAYS encourage me!!
@@ hey hey, Master Hipro5... I got that baby after this bench..:D
@ CPU-san, it's really got something in there, just try it;)
Way to go ;)
I would use digital camera to, Dont like to trust a computer that runs 80 % faster than normal :D
I'm checking itQuote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
but it's linked to win386.swp (win 9X and ME), for XP, 2k, 2k3 the swap file is pagefile.sys, we can always try that
no , there is nothing to do with pagefile , instead of that, it merely just set the file usage only;)
Some don't realize we're talking of LESS than 9 seconds. What do they want 5 camera stills like in a 32M run? :stick:Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
You've proved enough with the spi checksum. So don't bother explaining yourself anymore ;)Since OPB has already posted the checksum, shouldn't someone say something? You've been muted for 2 pages, not saying you should apologize, just say something like "Well finally it's been proved, congratulations etc etc"Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxxpower
Quote:
Originally Posted by mursaat
Not necessary, as long as they are cool, then I am more than happy to share all my work.
I am not 100% correct, but at least I won't hide anything I know of tweaking this benchmark.:) Fair enough.:toast:
You said you got many sub 9 sec but the CPU frozeQuote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
Is that screen is your absolutely max
________
juggalos